* Ron Olson:
> Pretty much as the subject says, I have a compile failure on Rawhide
> where a cpp file references . I checked and the file is
> not present in Rawhide, it *is* present in Fedora 32 and Fedora 33. I
> haven't found any references to it being deprecated so I'm wondering
> why it's
* Jerry James:
> See https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ocaml-dune?collection=f34
>
> OCaml package builds are suddenly failing because the symbols
> __xstat64, __fxstat64, and __lxstat64 cannot be found, maybe due to
> this change:
>
> - linux: Move {f}xstat{at} to compat symbols
>
> Can
* Neal Gompa:
> This is a serious violation of glibc's stated promise of infinite
> backwards compatibility. How in the world did this slip through? Can
> we use our gating system to kick back builds that are obviously broken
> that even the package manager stops working?
This issue is not about
* Fabio Valentini:
> Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff,
> including running dnf:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in
> from dnf.cli import main
> File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in
Orion Poplawski wrote on 2020/10/21 11:19:
What am I doing wrong? This is on my rawhide VM.
$ sudo dnf --enablerepo=*-debuginfo install python3.9-debuginfo
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:06 ago on Tue 20 Oct 2020 08:08:20 PM MDT.
No match for argument: python3.9-debuginfo
Error: Unable
On 10/20/20 7:19 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
What am I doing wrong? This is on my rawhide VM.
$ sudo dnf --enablerepo=*-debuginfo install python3.9-debuginfo
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:06 ago on Tue 20 Oct 2020 08:08:20
PM MDT.
No match for argument: python3.9-debuginfo
Error:
A quick Google search found this:
https://github.com/bminor/glibc/commit/d6fa3170997b4af0a702eebdae7e4d3c57d74b65
It looks like glibc previously deprecated, and now removed it. You
probably need to use gettimeofday or clock_gettime, as the note says.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 10:27 PM Ron Olson
Hey all-
Pretty much as the subject says, I have a compile failure on Rawhide where
a cpp file references . I checked and the file is not present
in Rawhide, it *is* present in Fedora 32 and Fedora 33. I haven't found any
references to it being deprecated so I'm wondering why it's missing.
What am I doing wrong? This is on my rawhide VM.
$ sudo dnf --enablerepo=*-debuginfo install python3.9-debuginfo
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:06 ago on Tue 20 Oct 2020 08:08:20
PM MDT.
No match for argument: python3.9-debuginfo
Error: Unable to find a match: python3.9-debuginfo
--
Fabio Valentini writes:
> ImportError: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0: undefined symbol: lstat64, version
> GLIBC_2.33
This looks like something was built against the new glibc, but tried to
run against the old glibc...
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889925
Bug ID: 1889925
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20201020 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords:
On 10/20/20 5:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 18:47 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Can
>> we use our gating system to kick back builds that are obviously broken
>> that even the package manager stops working?
> Theoretically, yes, this is possible. We could add this and any
On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 18:47 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Can
> we use our gating system to kick back builds that are obviously broken
> that even the package manager stops working?
Theoretically, yes, this is possible. We could add this and any other
functional tests we liked to Fedora CI or openQA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889922
Bug ID: 1889922
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20201020 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords:
On 10/20/20 4:47 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:44 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 10/20/20 4:41 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:38 PM Fabio Valentini
>>> wrote:
Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff,
including running
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 6:44 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 10/20/20 4:41 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:38 PM Fabio Valentini
> > wrote:
> >> Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff,
> >> including running dnf:
> > That looks like the same problem
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:42 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> And of course I started a separate thread with that issue because I'm
> tired and forgot your post ...
Sounds like a great excuse to go get some rest and come back to find
out what somebody did to fix this. :-)
--
Jerry James
On 10/20/20 4:41 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:38 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff,
>> including running dnf:
> That looks like the same problem I wrote about this morning:
>
>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:06 PM Jerry James wrote:
>
> See https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ocaml-dune?collection=f34
>
> OCaml package builds are suddenly failing because the symbols
> __xstat64, __fxstat64, and __lxstat64 cannot be found, maybe due to
> this change:
>
> - linux: Move
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 4:38 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff,
> including running dnf:
That looks like the same problem I wrote about this morning:
Hi everybody,
Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff,
including running dnf:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in
from dnf.cli import main
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in
import
Hi all,
I'll upgrade log4cxx to 0.11.0, which bumps the soname.
The only dependency is fawkes, which I will rebuild.
Kind regards,
Till
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
b
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:49 PM Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
>
> On 19.10.2020 17:25, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:16 pm, Arnoldas Skinderis
> > wrote:
> >> I'am also have Thikpads and MSI running BIOS and some of those
> >> machines still are the beast in some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835451
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835451
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855962
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d933f06bdb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d933f06bdb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1835451
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-336033183b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-336033183b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855962
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855962
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-336033183b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-336033183b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20201010.0):
ID: 702772 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-WebService-Rajce-1.202 |perl-WebService-Rajce-1.202
On 19.10.2020 17:25, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 8:16 pm, Arnoldas Skinderis
wrote:
I'am also have Thikpads and MSI running BIOS and some of those
machines still are the beast in some terms. Dropping BIOS would
pretty much force me to use something else.
I don't want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888288
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b15161810d
pdns-4.3.1-1.el8
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-69c0102261
singularity-3.6.4-1.el8
4
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-d015f19e05
singularity-3.6.4-1.el7
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-01179f6b9f
suricata-4.1.9-1.el7
The following builds have
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2dbce134fd
singularity-3.6.4-1.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
sympa-6.2.58-1.el6
Details about builds:
On 10/20/20 2:14 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 3:11 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 10/20/20 9:08 PM, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
I would be interested in taking celt071 if nobody else wants it. I use Mumble
regularly.
See also https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2478#comment-695972
I
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 3:11 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 10/20/20 9:08 PM, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
> > I would be interested in taking celt071 if nobody else wants it. I use
> > Mumble
> > regularly.
>
> See also https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2478#comment-695972
>
I adopted it before seeing
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 7:00 AM wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2020-10-21 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
>
Here are the nominated bugs to be discussed tomorrow:
* glibc: Back
On 10/20/20 9:08 PM, Brandon Nielsen wrote:
I would be interested in taking celt071 if nobody else wants it. I use Mumble
regularly.
See also https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2478#comment-695972
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
On 10/19/20 4:55 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886862
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889632
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-6fd40105c4 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-95a71e75a0 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
Hi folks, the i3 SIG met again for our second and final meeting for
October. This week's call was a video call. The recording is being
uploaded, but for now, check out the meeting summary below.
Some Pull Requests that followed up on our meeting discussions today:
* Docs:
* Kickstart:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889632
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-53e7947f45 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/pull/4388
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi,
As we are speaking about the test, we should not forget to test the
different
mapping tree usages:
the common ones (like standard, chaining or referral on update backends)
and the uncommon ones (like those involving the various distribution
plugins)
I am a bit uneasy about thoses, as I
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-10-21 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
Hey...
Thanks for all the input!
On 10/19/20 1:21 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> About a year ago I stub out the interfaces
> and had them return an error if called.
> No one has complained...
>
> This time I would like to remove interfaces
> so there will be no support whatsoever to
Notification time stamped 2020-10-20 16:03:13 UTC
From d5b2ff35266033993827428bdbdbefc00c36bdae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Oct 20 2020 15:53:10 +
Subject: Upgrade to 0.007.
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index ab6300c..b692540 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++
Notification time stamped 2020-10-20 15:56:49 UTC
From d5b2ff35266033993827428bdbdbefc00c36bdae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ralf Corsépius
Date: Oct 20 2020 15:53:10 +
Subject: Upgrade to 0.007.
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index ab6300c..b692540 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.9
Test week which is happening from 2020-10-26 to 2020-11-02. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in details about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As
On Tue, 2020-10-20 at 01:21 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 33 Candidate RC-1.2 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883530
Dave Johansen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(davejohansen@gmai |
|l.com)
Spam, delete please Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:21 AM, sara taylor wrote: TecheMinds provides all the latest technology updates, gadgets, business strategies, Digital marketing and many more upcoming
TecheMinds provides all the latest technology updates, gadgets, business
strategies, Digital marketing and many more upcoming trends.
https://www.techeminds.com/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889575
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Graph-0.9705 is|perl-Graph-0.9706 is
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20201019.0):
ID: 702688 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889341
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888513
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-5a8de7186f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889027
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-4c709aaaf3 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889198
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889161
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889018
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888767
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-33-20201019.n.0):
ID: 702489 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/702489
Soft failed openQA tests: 10/181 (x86_64)
(Tests
See https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/ocaml-dune?collection=f34
OCaml package builds are suddenly failing because the symbols
__xstat64, __fxstat64, and __lxstat64 cannot be found, maybe due to
this change:
- linux: Move {f}xstat{at} to compat symbols
Can the change be reverted until we
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 99/181 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889632
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-35757c325e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-35757c325e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889632
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-2c9a6b24e4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-2c9a6b24e4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881518
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882958
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884931
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882957
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1888006
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-97f25535d3 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885368
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1882938
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884870
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-97f25535d3 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887366
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1880857
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1881646
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883498
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870861
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1870878
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879217
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879600
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871053
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-MODULAR-2020-a4e0c533a8 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 Modular testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889632
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Le mardi 20 octobre 2020 à 12:32 +0200, Petr Pisar a écrit :
>
> In my opinion what became slugish (besides web browsers) are desktop
> environments that "accelerated" GUI by a move to OpenGL and
> JavaScript.
> A typical examples are login managers. GDM actually loads full Gnome,
> thus GDM
>
On 10/19/20 6:47 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
The issue is that while 'moore's' law was no longer doubling every 18months
it was still working and tasks had to be rewritten to work with more
cores/threads/etc. As that happened the software's need for more CPU power
has increased to the point
OLD: Fedora-33-20201019.n.0
NEW: Fedora-33-20201020.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 6
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 225.10 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883530
--- Comment #5 from David Hannequin ---
Hi,
I done request. See below.
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/29855
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889685
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An HTTP error occurred downloading the package's new Source URLs: Getting
https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/Clone/Clone-PP-1.08.tar.gz to
./Clone-PP-1.08.tar.gz
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889685
Bug ID: 1889685
Summary: perl-Clone-PP-1.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Clone-PP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855962
Sjoerd Mullender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|ERRATA
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 7/7 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo