On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:46:15PM -0400, Susi Lehtola wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've had a koji build running for over 6 hours, and the s390x build
> still hasn't started. Are the s390x builders offline?
Nope. However, a bunch of builds landed earlier today and all the big
ones are taking up the
Hi,
I've had a koji build running for over 6 hours, and the s390x build
still hasn't started. Are the s390x builders offline?
--
Susi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Template-Alloy-1.022-1 |perl-Template-Alloy-1.022-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Template-Alloy-1.022-1 |perl-Template-Alloy-1.022-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890910
Bug 1890910 depends on bug 1890933, which changed state.
Bug 1890933 Summary: Add perl-Pegex for EPEL8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890933
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890933
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Can't wait.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
Hello:
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2021/04/01 6:45:
On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
* Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds
> ...
* Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter
buildroot content checking. Fixing this in the packaging is always
backwards
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >* Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds
> > > ...
> > >* Many existing packages will
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >* Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds
> > ...
> >* Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter
> >buildroot content checking. Fixing this in the packaging is
On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
* Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds
> ...
* Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter
buildroot content checking. Fixing this in the packaging is always
backwards compatible. We could temporarily set
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 03:52:41PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>> ** Dynamic spec generation
>
> Details?
My guess would be that this one is meant:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1485
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
This mail is addressed to Outreachy applicants interested in contributing
or already contributing to Fedora QA Dashboard.
Due to public holiday in Czech Republic mentors will not be available in
these dates:
* lbrabec: Apr 1 - Apr 5
* jskladan: Apr 2 - Apr 5
Lukas
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 03:52:41PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> ** Dynamic spec generation
Details?
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Hi Everyone,
Sorry for the two week gap since my last report, we had a busy time in
the CPE team with the new fedora accounts deployment, our quarterly
planning cycle started for Q2 and Ireland had a bank holiday mid week
which *seemed* like a great idea at the time. Until no-one knew what
day it
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.17
== Summary ==
Update RPM to the [https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.17.0 4.17] release.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:pmatilai|Panu Matilainen]]
* Email: [pmati...@redhat.com]
== Detailed Description ==
RPM 4.17 contains numerous improvements over
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 03:08:33PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 31/03/21 13:51 +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> > Yes. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9816
>
> And
>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 03:11:31PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:52:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > $ git pull --rebase
> > fatal: '/rpms/libguestfs' does not appear to be a git repository
> > fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
> >
> >
Hi Petr,
On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 14:12 +0200, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Hello,
>
> strongswan and NetworkManager-strongswan packages were passed to me
> from
> previous maintainer. I admit I have little experience with them and
> do
> not run any service based on them. Because IPSsec is quite complex
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210329.0):
ID: 838515 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_rebase@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/838515
Old failures (same test
On 31/03/21 18:46 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:42:48 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:29:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64923615
>
> This build has been sat in the "free" state for an
On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:42:48 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:29:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64923615
> >
> > This build has been sat in the "free" state for an hour or two. Could
> > this be
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 05:29:33PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64923615
>
> This build has been sat in the "free" state for an hour or two. Could
> this be related to the dist-git issue from earlier?
Actually everything looks like it's
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=64923615
This build has been sat in the "free" state for an hour or two. Could
this be related to the dist-git issue from earlier?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210328.0):
ID: 838359 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/838359
On 31/03/21 13:51 +, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
Yes. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9816
And
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5KZBG5ARPD7MIKVHJSFSNO6VE4YPEFGA/
and https://status.fedoraproject.org/
Yes. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9816
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, March
I'm trying to clone a repo but it's failing like it doesn't exist:
$ fedpkg clone OpenImageIO OIIO-test
Cloning into 'OIIO-test'...
fatal: '/rpms/OpenImageIO' does not appear to be a git repository
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 11/178 (x86_64), 17/127 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On 31/03/21 14:25 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 31/03/21 15:00 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 31.03.2021 11:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
But I can start the same rebuilds in rawhide now to avoid the version
skew.
Please merge your commit from f34 instead of doing another one:
On 31/03/21 15:00 +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 31.03.2021 11:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
But I can start the same rebuilds in rawhide now to avoid the version
skew.
Please merge your commit from f34 instead of doing another one:
fedpkg switch-branch rawhide
git merge f34
Yes,
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> On 31/03/21 11:46 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>I do not see such symbol references for dotnet5.0. I have
>
> Agreed, I downloaded dotnet-runtime-5.0-5.0.4-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm and
> checked it too (although not the other subpackages in that build).
>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:52:16PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> $ git pull --rebase
> fatal: '/rpms/libguestfs' does not appear to be a git repository
> fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
>
> Please make sure you have the correct access rights
> and the repository exists.
>
>
On 31.03.2021 11:45, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
But I can start the same rebuilds in rawhide now to avoid the version
skew.
Please merge your commit from f34 instead of doing another one:
fedpkg switch-branch rawhide
git merge f34
fedpkg build --nowait
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
On 30.03.2021 18:13, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Package maintainers should not need to do anything, but will see a
%release bump and a rebuild.
In future, please commit to rawhide branch too. I want to keep my Git
history linear to avoid any merge conflicts between branches.
Also pushing the
$ git pull --rebase
fatal: '/rpms/libguestfs' does not appear to be a git repository
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
and the repository exists.
$ git remote get-url origin
ssh://rjo...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libguestfs
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 09:58:08AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-03-27 at 09:06 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 09:06:14PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 17:39 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > On Fri,
Hello,
strongswan and NetworkManager-strongswan packages were passed to me from
previous maintainer. I admit I have little experience with them and do
not run any service based on them. Because IPSsec is quite complex
technology, I am looking for help with its maintenance. I was always
using
confidence.pete...@gmail.com
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 01:24:02PM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> usnic-tools honli
RPATH had been removed from build usnic-tools-1.1.2.1-8.fc35 .
thanks
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210330.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210331.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:9
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 71
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.13 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 31/03/21 11:46 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Omair Majid:
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely writes:
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work
* Omair Majid:
> Hi,
>
> Jonathan Wakely writes:
>
>> Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
>> start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
>> references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
>> intended, and so will not be
On 31/03/21 09:10 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Le mar. 30 mars 2021 à 18:13, Jonathan Wakely
a écrit :
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which
* Nicolas Chauvet:
> Le mar. 30 mars 2021 à 18:13, Jonathan Wakely
> a écrit :
>>
>> Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
>> start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
>> references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
>>
On 30/03/21 18:24 -0400, Omair Majid wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Wakely writes:
Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
intended, and so
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210330.0):
ID: 837734 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
Dne 31. 03. 21 v 10:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 30. 03. 21 v 17:07 Ian McInerney napsal(a):
Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in
Bodhi for builds I submit to rawhide? I find it very inconvenient
because it means I can't add the appropriate bugzilla
Dne 30. 03. 21 v 17:07 Ian McInerney napsal(a):
Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in
Bodhi for builds I submit to rawhide? I find it very inconvenient
because it means I can't add the appropriate bugzilla
references/description to the update when I submit
I won't comment on if this is good or bad idea, but have you tried to
use `%{echo:...}` [1]?
Vít
[1] https://rpm.org/user_doc/macros.html
Dne 30. 03. 21 v 19:11 Robert-André Mauchin napsal(a):
Hello,
Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to
display a message to my
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210330.0):
ID: 837676 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/837676
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64),
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 9:04 AM Zdenek Pytela wrote:
> The freeze is on Tuesday, the plan is Monday, or after GA if it fails for
> some reason.
>
Beware that bodhi is active for Fedora 34, so the update would need to
receive necessary karma to be actually pushed before the freeze (I think
the
Le mar. 30 mars 2021 à 18:13, Jonathan Wakely
a écrit :
>
> Due to an unplanned ABI break that I caused in libstdc++, I will soon
> start to rebuild the packages listed below. This rebuild will remove
> references to some symbols in libstdc++.so which do not work as
> intended, and so will not be
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 4:14 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 1:56 PM Zdenek Pytela wrote:
>
> > We do not expect any impact to end users neither to developers unless
> the exact version was used somewhere. If there are no objections, we will
> make the change in a week time.
>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:19 AM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Zdenek Pytela wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:45 PM justina colmena ~biz
> > wrote:
> > > I'm still a little bit confused about the SELinux targeted policy
> > > "development" process
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/31/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210331gitecd7e71d1.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Net-Netmask` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-Netmask/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
57 matches
Mail list logo
