Re: Outreachy 2021 applicant

Hello Lukas Brabec I need some help for outreachy final application. ___ qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to qa-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Dynamic preemption support in Linux 5.12 kernel

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 12:39 PM Artem Tim wrote: > > Hello. > > Upcoming 5.12 allow building with dynamic preemption support which allows > changing mode at boot/run-time so finally no need to rebuild or make > alternative kernel build anymore[1]. Responsive system is a must have for > gaming

Re: Dynamic preemption support in Linux 5.12 kernel

Yes, please. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:

[Bug 1953376] New: perl-Workflow-1.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953376 Bug ID: 1953376 Summary: perl-Workflow-1.54 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Workflow Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Test-Announce] 2021-04-26 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2021-04-26 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! Fedora 34 is signed off, so let's do a final status check and make sure everything's good to go, and

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210425.n.0 changes

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 09:00:06AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 6:08 AM Fedora Rawhide Report > wrote: > > Package: python-decorator-5.0.7-1.fc35 > > Old package: python-decorator-4.4.2-4.fc34 > > Summary: Module to simplify usage of decorators > > RPMs:

Dynamic preemption support in Linux 5.12 kernel

Hello. Upcoming 5.12 allow building with dynamic preemption support which allows changing mode at boot/run-time so finally no need to rebuild or make alternative kernel build anymore[1]. Responsive system is a must have for gaming and good desktop experience overall, not only for professional

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210425.n.0 changes

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 09:00:06AM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 6:08 AM Fedora Rawhide Report > wrote: > > Package: python-decorator-5.0.7-1.fc35 > > Old package: python-decorator-4.4.2-4.fc34 > > Summary: Module to simplify usage of decorators > > RPMs:

Re: New RPM submission

fixed On April 25, 2021 16:27:57 Dennis Gilmore wrote: some of the changes have just been committed already, or an equivalent. The value you have for the license is incorrect https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main lists the correct values -License:LGPL-2.1 +License:

Re: PETSc 3.15

$ koji list-tagged --latest f35-build-side-40112 Build Tag Built by bout++-4.3.2-8.fc35 f35-build-side-40112 davidsch

Fedora-Rawhide-20210425.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 26 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 108/189 (x86_64), 63/127 (aarch64) New failures (same test not

Re: Self Introduction: Bryce Carson

Thanks, Dominik. I'll also note that I have made the Review Request on Bugzilla: . I have spoken with the upstream developer about renaming the binary, and they are unwilling to do so. A Conflicts tag might be required. If @hubbitus

Re: New RPM submission

Not sure what happend but the failure is gone somehow Anyway, I pushed the "bug report" here : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953340 Is that correct ? Thanks On 2021-04-25 16:04, Joan Moreau wrote: you probably sent the same srpm No, it is a new one , re-generated

Re: New RPM submission

some of the changes have just been committed already, or an equivalent. The value you have for the license is incorrect https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main lists the correct values -License:LGPL-2.1 +License:LGPLv2 There is no need to explicitly Require

Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

This morning "dnf update" brought in bacula 11.0.2-3. Previously I had been on 9.6.7-1. Apparently, the new bacula wants a different database version. I have version 16, but it wants 1022. I looked at the files in /usr/share/doc/bacula-director/updatedb but there doesn't seem to be

Re: New RPM submission

you probably sent the same srpm No, it is a new one , re-generated just fine, I did make a few changes to the spec file. with a correct changelag entry it should pass review What changes are you suggesting ?___ devel mailing list --

Re: New RPM submission

you probably sent the same srpm, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2020 builds just fine, I did make a few changes to the spec file. with a correct changelag entry it should pass review Dennis On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:58 AM Joan Moreau via devel wrote: > > Same status :(

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210425.n.0 changes

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 6:08 AM Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > Package: python-decorator-5.0.7-1.fc35 > Old package: python-decorator-4.4.2-4.fc34 > Summary: Module to simplify usage of decorators > RPMs: python3-decorator > Size: 26.91 KiB > Size change: -315 B >

Re: New RPM submission

Thank you so much However, still the same issue: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1947/1947/build.log g++ is not found On 2021-04-25 15:42, Jerry James wrote: On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 7:58 AM Joan Moreau via devel wrote: Same status :( Try the attached version. It

Re: New RPM submission

* Joan Moreau via devel [24/04/2021 18:49] : > > It looks overwhelmingly complicated. Out of curiosity, which part of the process looks complicated. Perhaps we can simplify it. Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: New RPM submission

thanks With the correction I get https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1646/1646/build.log Still not finding g++ :( On 2021-04-25 15:29, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:48 AM Richard Shaw wrote: On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:36 AM Joan Moreau via devel wrote:

Re: Self Introduction: Bryce Carson

Hello, Bryce. On Sunday, 25 April 2021 at 03:01, Bryce Carson wrote: > Hello Fedora Developers, > > I'm an undergraduate biologist, and I've been using Linux 24/7 for four > years. I've been involved with MesserLab's SLiM software project for half a > year now, functioning as the volunteer

Re: New RPM submission

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 7:58 AM Joan Moreau via devel wrote: > Same status :( Try the attached version. It fixes several minor problems in the spec file. The problem you were encountering was the lack of the "-n fts-xapian-%{version}" argument to %autosetup. The default directory name is

Re: New RPM submission

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:48 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:36 AM Joan Moreau via devel > wrote: >> >> When I launch the "koji" comand, build fails because it does not find g++ >> >> (see : >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9140/66659140/build.log ) >> >>

Re: New RPM submission

Same status :( https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9973/66659973/build.log On 2021-04-25 14:46, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:36 AM Joan Moreau via devel wrote: When I launch the "koji" comand, build fails because it does not find g++ (see :

Re: Heads Up: openexr 3.0 coming to Rawhide

Quick update, long story short there were a ton a build failures in my testing COPR and I haven't had a lot of time to troubleshoot. Will work on it as I can. Thanks, Richard > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: New RPM submission

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 8:36 AM Joan Moreau via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > When I launch the "koji" comand, build fails because it does not find g++ > > (see : > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9140/66659140/build.log ) > > However, I put gcc-c++ in the

Re: New RPM submission

Hello I tried anyway to follow the process of submitting a new RPM When I launch the "koji" comand, build fails because it does not find g++ (see : https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9140/66659140/build.log ) However, I put gcc-c++ in the BuildRequires line (see :

Re: announcing kpmcore soname bump

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 9:27 AM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Hello folks, > > I've upgraded kpmcore in a rawhide side-tag (f35-build-side-40400) and > rebuilt the dependent package there due to soname version bump: > > - calamares > - kde-partitionmanager > > I will push the side-tag to

announcing kpmcore soname bump

Hello folks, I've upgraded kpmcore in a rawhide side-tag (f35-build-side-40400) and rebuilt the dependent package there due to soname version bump: - calamares - kde-partitionmanager I will push the side-tag to stable in the next few days, without objections. Mattia

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210425.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210424.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210425.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 8 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 45 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.05 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210425.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210424.0): ID: 869605 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[Bug 1952406] Upgrade perl-Config-Model-TkUI to 1.374

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1952406 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC|

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210425.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210424.0): ID: 869591 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL:

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-04-25 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/04/25/report-389-ds-base-2.0.4-20210425git0a399a2b4.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Kerberos and Fedora's 2FA UX

On la, 24 huhti 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 12:12:19PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Пт, 23 апр 2021, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 07:40:14AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > I have been using 2FA with the new Fedora Account system and the UX is ...