The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a6e2c9bc8c
radare2-5.3.1-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-0209079fce
aom-3.1.1-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:19 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:37:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 20 2021 at 07:29:16 AM -0400, Neal Gompa
> > wrote:
> > >Most of our rules are designed to make sure there's someone ultimately
> >
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 16:37 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 17:05 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > coffee-script package was recently retired due to being orphaned and
> > FTBFS for some while. Since there are some other packages depending
> > on
> > it, I have
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 17:24 -0500, Ron Olson wrote:
> Hey all-
>
> I’m trying to run a mock build with EPEL-8 (epel-8-x86_64) and it fails
> with:
>
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-8=x86_64
is working for me
mock -r epel-8-x86_64 --install kernel-headers also works
Hey all-
I’m trying to run a mock build with EPEL-8 (epel-8-x86_64) and it fails with:
[MIRROR] kernel-headers-4.18.0-305.3.1.el8_4.x86_64.rpm: Status code: 403 for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974141
Bug ID: 1974141
Summary: perl-Config-INI-0.026 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Config-INI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974142
Bug ID: 1974142
Summary: perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered-0.021 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Config-INI-Reader-Ordered
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 09:02:08AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18 2021 at 08:02:05 AM +1000, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > Right now pipewire gets around this by hardcoding pipewire-media-session
> > and
> > starting it directly (instead of the systemd service) but that makes it
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974137
Bug ID: 1974137
Summary: F35FailsToInstall: perl-Pinto
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Pinto
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974136
Bug ID: 1974136
Summary: F35FailsToInstall: perl-Email-Sender
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Email-Sender
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 8:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> My question would be: Are these automated builds otherwise known working
> and ready for integration testing with the rest of the distribution in
> rawhide?
>
> If they are, we (just) need to fix the bot to not do the wrong thing.
>
> If they
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 02:36:57PM +0200, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 1:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
...snip...
> >
> > Rawhide is still not your CI environment.
>
> By the way I think we need to reconsider this statement.
I think we should turn it around and say:
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't
have anything urgent on the agenda again, so let's take a break.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail and we can go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:26:52PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> Yeah. I'm looking a the original ticket in
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2228, and I think this was a mistake.
> We shouldn't have approved a bot that packages snapshot commits for
> rawhide. In the discussion, we
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 10:42 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 20. 06. 21 9:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > I think we should just disable this particular bot until it fixed.
> > We should also clarify/update the Update Guidelines so that
> > undesirable
> > updates are disallowed, no
Miro Hrončok writes:
>> - releng and SIGs submitting scripted mass rebuilds (no actual package
>> changes, triggered by a person)
>> - bots submitting rawhide builds for ELN (no package change, just
>> built for different buildroot)
> Other random ideas of what should be allowed:
> - a human
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 12:52 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Rawhide is still not your CI environment. Years ago, we got rid of
> > alphas for the express purpose to stabilize Rawhide into alpha
> > quality. Stuff like this degrades the quality of Rawhide because they
> > make the assumption that
Dnia Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:39:34AM +0200, Miro Hrončok napisał(a):
> On 19. 06. 21 22:18, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > The following things should still be allowed:
> > - releng and SIGs submitting scripted mass rebuilds (no actual package
> > changes, triggered by a person)
> > - bots submitting
On Sun, 2021-06-20 at 07:29 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> If you want the features of Rawhide for CI, then we should talk about
> enabling this in more places. For example, there's no technical reason
> we couldn't do OpenQA runs for packages in COPR. There are serious
> consequences to shipping
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 17/134 (aarch64), 15/199 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:55:00AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:45 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > I think this is a good idea. This particular bot has a history of
> > misbehavior
> > and rather than banning all the well behaving bots (that be definition we
> >
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:37:03AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 20 2021 at 07:29:16 AM -0400, Neal Gompa
> wrote:
> >Most of our rules are designed to make sure there's someone ultimately
> >responsible for everything going into Fedora. Unfortunately, bots are
> >the opposite of
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 6/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210619.0):
ID: 913018 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/913018
ID: 913027 Test: x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974101
Bug ID: 1974101
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210620 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords:
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 03:19:27PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello Zbigniew,
>
> Thank you very much for your answers and sorry for the late reply, IRL
> things have been hectic. I've had the problem with pipewire once since
> I last wrote, but I can't figure out how to trigger it at
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:17 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 18 2021 at 08:02:05 AM +1000, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> > Right now pipewire gets around this by hardcoding
> > pipewire-media-session and
> > starting it directly (instead of the systemd service) but that makes
> > it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1974093
Bug ID: 1974093
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210620 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords:
On Sun, Jun 20 2021 at 07:29:16 AM -0400, Neal Gompa
wrote:
Most of our rules are designed to make sure there's someone ultimately
responsible for everything going into Fedora. Unfortunately, bots are
the opposite of that, because there's no one to reach to stop bad
behavior when it happens.
Hi,
I'll take care of packaging rust-target and just.
Best regards,
--
Olivier
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210619.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210620.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Hello Zbigniew,
Thank you very much for your answers and sorry for the late reply, IRL
things have been hectic. I've had the problem with pipewire once since
I last wrote, but I can't figure out how to trigger it at will.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 8:36 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967544
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
The dippi package has been updated to 3.1.0 for ElementaryOS 6 in Rawhide.
Upstream clarified the licensing, and the entire program is now GPLv3+ with CC0
AppStream metadata. Based on this, and on recent discussion suggesting a
community preference for using effective licenses where feasible,
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 1:30 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:10 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide)
> > > becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the
> > > existing Updates Policy
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 12:31 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:10 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > > With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide)
> > > becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the
> > > existing Updates Policy [1]
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 7:10 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide)
> > becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the
> > existing Updates Policy [1] to make it explicit that bots are not
> > allowed to submit
> With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide)
> becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the
> existing Updates Policy [1] to make it explicit that bots are not
> allowed to submit builds / updates - even to rawhide - unattended:
> "Rawhide is not
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210619.0):
ID: 912645 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_reboot_unmount
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/912645
ID: 912646 Test: x86_64
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:45 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> I think this is a good idea. This particular bot has a history of misbehavior
> and rather than banning all the well behaving bots (that be definition we
> don't
> even know about, because they behave good), we should disable this
On 20. 06. 21 9:39, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
I think we should just disable this particular bot until it fixed.
We should also clarify/update the Update Guidelines so that undesirable
updates are disallowed, no matter if submitted by a bot or a human.
I think this is a good idea.
On 19. 06. 21 22:18, Fabio Valentini wrote:
The following things should still be allowed:
- releng and SIGs submitting scripted mass rebuilds (no actual package
changes, triggered by a person)
- bots submitting rawhide builds for ELN (no package change, just
built for different buildroot)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973908
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973898
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973648
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1973290
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 10:18:45PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> With things like [0] (TL;DR: bots submitting broken builds to rawhide)
> becoming a more regular occurrence, I propose that we extend the
> existing Updates Policy [1] to make it explicit that bots are not
>
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210619.0):
ID: 912635 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 03:44:11PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 2:52 PM Fedora Rawhide Report
> wrote:
> >
> > = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
> > Package: crun-0.19.1.13-0.15.git63400f2.fc35
> > Old package: crun-0.20.1.3-0.14.git9dec366.fc35
> > Summary:
48 matches
Mail list logo
