Shortly I will start building hdf5 1.12.1, vtk 9.1.0, and libdap 3.20.8
for rawhide in side tag f36-build-side-47974
I will be rebuilding all dependencies as well.
Dependencies with known issues:
- med https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1948248
and thus gmsh and getdp
- bes
--
No missing expected images.
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 5/208 (x86_64), 10/142 (aarch64)
ID: 1067153 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1067153
ID: 1067233 Test: x86_64
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-4215541875
puppet-6.25.1-1.el8
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
batctl-2021.4-1.el8
petsc-3.16.0-4.el8
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
64 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f005e1b879
debmirror-2.35-1.el7
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-70fe95babd
openssl11-1.1.1k-2.el7
The following builds have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025237
Bug ID: 2025237
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20211120 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025236
Bug ID: 2025236
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20211120 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20211120.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:59:11AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 05:32:28AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > Video2X would be a nice add.
>
> There's a package wishlist here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist
>
> But adding the
Hi all.
SCons-4.3.0 will be built in Rawhide in seven days.
Changelog: https://github.com/SCons/scons/blob/rel_4.3.0/CHANGES.txt
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/
Thank you, the BZ report is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138
I am already a packager of other packages so I believe that I do not need a
sponsor.
Best,
aa...@fedoraproject.org
On Saturday, November 20, 2021, 07:49:59 AM CST, Sérgio Basto
wrote:
On Fri,
Hello Antonio,
I'll take care of it.
Till later,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Fri, 2021-11-19 at 18:06 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 01:57:12PM +, Globe Trotter via devel
> wrote:
> > I opened the following:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10396
> >
> > I am not quite sure what happens after this, so I thought that I
> >
Yes, indeed, stupid me. I neglected to post the bugzilla request.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025138
Sorry.
Best wishes,
aa...@fedoraproject.org
On Saturday, November 20, 2021, 03:16:50 AM CST, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at
Hi all.
I need a packager for the review request of 'sdsl-lite' package. Open to
review another package in turn.
Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/
On Thu, 2021-11-18 at 16:27 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 1:14 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > another subject that can be related
> >
> > In thread "I think we should stop building i686 packages we're not
> > shipping" we are alerted for builds for i686 that
On Sat, 2021-11-20 at 04:46 +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the name says, this is a review request for the orphaned package
> oclock. I find that the old spec file from F34 complies without errors
> and so would like to maintain it. But first, I need a review. Could
> someone
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 04:46:17AM +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the name says, this is a review request for the orphaned package oclock. I
> find that the old spec file from F34 complies without errors and so would
> like to maintain it. But first, I need a review. Could
17 matches
Mail list logo