[Bug 2049898] plans for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049898 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 2049815] perl-Workflow-1.59 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049815 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Workflow-1.58 is |perl-Workflow-1.59 is

Re: OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

On 2/2/22 13:34, David Sommerseth wrote: > > Hi, > > An OpenVPN colleague of me, Antonio Quartulli (on Cc), has been working > on a kernel acceleration module for OpenVPN for quite some time. We > call this OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (DCO). This moves the tunnelled > network traffic to a new

Fedora-Rawhide-20220202.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 8 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 33/228 (x86_64), 18/159 (aarch64) ID: 1118192 Test: x86_64

[Bug 2048248] mod_perl-2.0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-7d342a4167 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2049238] perl-Devel-PPPort-3.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049238 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2048109] Please branch and build perl-IO-Async in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048109 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-56a8bcadcb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 2031798] perl-FCGI-Client for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031798 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-56a8bcadcb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 2031796] perl-Email-Sender for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031796 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-56a8bcadcb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 2048248] mod_perl-2.0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-21b63657e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Test-Announce] Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220202.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220202.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

some errors found [was:] what is wrong with this conditional scriptlet on rpm.spec

On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 18:41 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 14:26 -0400, Ben Beasley wrote: > > I don’t know where to find documentation for operator precedence in > > RPM > > conditional expressions, but it looks like “!” binds more tightly > > than > > “>=”, so > > > >  >

[Bug 2048248] mod_perl-2.0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 2036126] Please branch and build perl-Web-Scraper for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036126 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1811577] perl-Finance-Quote EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811577 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 2036125] Please branch and build perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036125 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8cd0241486 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6395a45cb3 perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1.el7 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-4069001f10 miniupnpc-2.0-3.el7 0

[Bug 2036125] Please branch and build perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036125 --- Comment #7 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Rebuilds done. I've updated the Bodhi update with the new builds. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036125

[Bug 2049898] New: plans for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049898 Bug ID: 2049898 Summary: plans for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: perl-BSD-Resource Assignee: jpazdzi...@redhat.com

Re: GNOME 42 builds for F36: use f36-gnome side tag

On Wed, 2022-02-02 at 09:11 +, David King wrote: > Hi all > > I am looking after GNOME builds this release cycle, as Kalev is away, > and I have requested a side tag for building GNOME packages intended for > F36. Please build updates of GNOME packages in the 42 series into the > f36-gnome

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Bauer --- I'll take the entire project. My FAS account is kni. It looks like the failed test occurs only on EPEL 9 x86_64 architecture: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/kni/mod_perl-for-epel/build/3291634/

Re: [CoreOS] Fedora CoreOS Community Video Meeting 2022-02-02

On 2/1/22 13:12, Dusty Mabe wrote: > Hi All, > > Tomorrow we will be holding a video meeting for the Fedora CoreOS community. > > We will be discussing Fedora 36 changes as well as our high level goals. > > Time: 16:30 UTC (same as normal) on Wednesday February 2nd > Location:

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 06:41:16PM +0100, Alain Vigne wrote: > > My problem is : I don't know how to debug in the mock environment. (But, I > should persevere: there is always a solution, you proved it to me ;) > Try `mock shell`. You won't have Internet access inside, so if you need to add more

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-02-03 17:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2022-02-03 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.libera.chat.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2022-02-03 09:00 PST US/Pacific 2022-02-03

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 11:41 AM Alain Vigne wrote: > Aahhh. Good job ! Now I understand ! You are right ! > This Requires should be a BuildRequires, correct, > (and I was right too ;) because in my environment (rpmbuild) I have this > mujs-devel package installed, and the files landed in my

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 6:29 PM Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 10:26 AM Jerry James wrote: > > The reason is in the build log: > > Checking for mujs... not found > > ... > > binding: fungw_mujs disabled > > Your spec file has this: > > %package -n %{libmujs} >

OpenVPN 2.x with kernel acceleration

Hi, An OpenVPN colleague of me, Antonio Quartulli (on Cc), has been working on a kernel acceleration module for OpenVPN for quite some time. We call this OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (DCO). This moves the tunnelled network traffic to a new kernel module (ovpn-dco) and keep only the control

[Bug 2049815] New: perl-Workflow-1.58 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049815 Bug ID: 2049815 Summary: perl-Workflow-1.58 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Workflow Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2049744] plans for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049744 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2030601] mod_perl in EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030601 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zonexpertconsulting@outlook

FedoraRespin-35-updates-20220202.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/46 (x86_64) ID: 1118104 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1118104 ID: 1118125 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1118125

Minutes for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2022-02-01)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2022-02-01) === Meeting started by tstellar at 18:02:09 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2022-02-01/fesco.2022-02-01-18.02.log.html . Meeting

Re: Package notes issues with python wheel building

On 02/02/2022 17:15, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: I guess we need to fix krb5 this way too. Current package notes implementation is awful. It should not touch linker flags. RPM post-build hooks should be used instead for adding annotations. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 10:26 AM Jerry James wrote: > The reason is in the build log: > Checking for mujs... not found > ... > binding: fungw_mujs disabled Your spec file has this: %package -n %{libmujs} Summary: Scripting support for %{name}: MuJS Requires: %{libname} =

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 9:31 AM Alain Vigne wrote: > What may lead you to this conclusion ? Because that's what the error message means. It means that there is a file pattern in %files that does not match anything in the buildroot. > My observation is: > The %make_install step install all

[Bug 2046802] perl: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f36

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046802 --- Comment #8 from Dan Horák --- If you need access to a rawhide/ppc64le machine, please let me know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046802

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 4:50:59 PM CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 02/02/2022 16:35, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > And if not specified, mock tries to > > pick the mock configuration according the host system (so it uses > > '-r fedora-35-x86_64' on a fedora-35-x86_64 host system). > >

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

Still the same fallout from that rage quit ... I wouldn't mind taking adf-tribun-fonts (I already have two from that foundry), but I'm really wondering whether we should package fonts which no other package depends upon: It's easy for users to install them directly, packaged versions do not

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

Hello Jerry On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 5:07 PM Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:27 AM Alain Vigne > wrote: > > And indeed, same error: > > RPM build errors: > > error: File not found: > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib/puplug/fungw_mujs.* > > File not

Re: Package notes issues with python wheel building

On ke, 02 helmi 2022, Simo Sorce wrote: So I got this bug about FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049643 These are bindings to C libs and use gcc to build .so files. Upon investigation the issue is that the default linker flags seem to point to non existing package note

[Bug 2049744] New: plans for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049744 Bug ID: 2049744 Summary: plans for EPEL 9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 Status: NEW Component: mod_perl Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter:

Package notes issues with python wheel building

So I got this bug about FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049643 These are bindings to C libs and use gcc to build .so files. Upon investigation the issue is that the default linker flags seem to point to non existing package note files, so the build fails. It was suggest to

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

* Alain Vigne [02/02/2022 16:07] : > > Can someone explain to me why my .srpm [1] > is not building in mock ? This fails with the following message: RPM build errors: error: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib64/libfungw_mujs.* error: File not found:

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 8:27 AM Alain Vigne wrote: > And indeed, same error: > RPM build errors: > error: File not found: > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc36.x86_64/usr/lib/puplug/fungw_mujs.* > File not found: >

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 4:51 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On 02/02/2022 16:35, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > And if not specified, mock tries to > > pick the mock configuration according the host system (so it uses > > '-r fedora-35-x86_64' on a fedora-35-x86_64

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Update to the lastest version, (fixes rhbz#1793505) (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 56e19762e3aadffcc34a55087cd81c18651709aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Damian Wrobel Date: Jan 22 2020 13:35:45 + Subject: Update to the lastest version, (fixes rhbz#1793505) Dop patches upstream merged --- diff --git a/.gitignore

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Initial import (#1418310)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From d2881c283db99b4e89f4c52e7900bffdeee4bb72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Damian Wrobel Date: Feb 08 2017 08:32:58 + Subject: Initial import (#1418310) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e69de29..f34f3d3 100644 ---

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 4f62e6a3dcdee2e794cebe78ce1f3c01eebe3126 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 21 2022 04:57:12 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Perl 5.34 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 82e66200fd5a6a81d3e154a71c0a7648a3b79e01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: May 23 2021 00:16:59 + Subject: Perl 5.34 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec b/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec index 42597ff..372e956 100644

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 0689d39888d0d05c662ff5211eb2efce4c094d50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 22 2021 23:31:24 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 76ede33bb79e2113864fd00b10682ed50ba24d74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 28 2020 18:34:59 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From fa97e97e1761972cee088dc7c0fc4d7baece71ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 27 2021 04:21:34 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Specify all dependencies"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 5c3b66c655b42ff03bf8aa9d025df94505dc56db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mar 17 2020 12:17:57 + Subject: Specify all dependencies --- diff --git a/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec b/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec index 676b543..5f39d66

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Add BuildRequires: make (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 7d4925d40cceb3c82d36c164016e59b46363ffec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Stellard Date: Jan 08 2021 02:57:07 + Subject: Add BuildRequires: make https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_make_from_BuildRoot --- diff --git

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Perl 5.32 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From ecfdf25e5875870b2fac6c9299c0f0f5312a9965 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 23 2020 10:40:14 + Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec b/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec index 5f39d66..fc3f794 100644

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From e90ecf86c2aa71ec788c9108b25d03fe5cd9765c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 30 2020 04:09:20 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 62e6b8fb7a5b7bbc594ac8e43986558f002bebd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 01 2019 23:55:02 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From e7721a1a2fae2ae976a6bd2944dfcb2b88b3ab91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 26 2019 06:20:53 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Remove obsolete Group tag (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From adf60321e52810554c692f091fdc5b77e92669ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Igor Gnatenko Date: Jan 28 2019 19:24:33 + Subject: Remove obsolete Group tag References: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_Group_Tag --- diff --git

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Perl 5.30 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From ab1c37ef3564817de560dbcf027e285a6dcafb27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 01 2019 22:21:47 + Subject: Perl 5.30 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec b/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec index cb2a677..aed503e 100644

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Perl 5.28 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From b26837f8a0d9f097a7f1fa8510e8591fee804851 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 30 2018 02:35:19 + Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec b/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec index e892164..f5f9fdb 100644

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 938ecaa3ce0f2d04bc184b90f508ea990666d4a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 12:09:04 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 2c79c99fd2c4cba7181b2e76bfb3b1b8f822d2b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 13 2018 19:38:21 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From a7a290a61be485556221cdb312b7d658a6e20246 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 09 2018 00:29:58 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 9fcd3e510d0120552bd20d6f01a741e3e4ccac44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 06 2017 13:06:08 + Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec b/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec index a213788..0dd1d42 100644

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From f49be5c1c17618c59c67a939576a4177a1c268ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jul 12 2017 12:44:33 + Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From f64984c3e214eb9e7de3a92e21b1a87eab98580b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2017 05:59:31 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Rebuilt for missing BR"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From f9c7491f94fd72593c4e4819a88e09caab13064b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Damian Wrobel Date: Feb 16 2017 14:50:57 + Subject: Rebuilt for missing BR --- diff --git a/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec b/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec index 675a93e..95d2253

kni pushed to perl-SOAP-WSDL (epel9). "Yet another rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-02-02 15:53:50 UTC From 3c0c20bc9a40501c94b1f44fa7d66bcc956d3442 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Damian Wrobel Date: Feb 20 2017 09:42:37 + Subject: Yet another rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec b/perl-SOAP-WSDL.spec index 95d2253..a213788 100644

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On 02/02/2022 16:35, Pavel Raiskup wrote: And if not specified, mock tries to pick the mock configuration according the host system (so it uses '-r fedora-35-x86_64' on a fedora-35-x86_64 host system). No. It uses /etc/mock/default.cfg. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

[Bug 2049731] New: Upgrade perl-Geo-IPfree to 1.160000

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049731 Bug ID: 2049731 Summary: Upgrade perl-Geo-IPfree to 1.16 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Geo-IPfree Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 2049238] perl-Devel-PPPort-3.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049238 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c091c41bd1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-c091c41bd1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On 2/2/22 10:07 AM, Alain Vigne wrote: Can someone explain to me why my  .srpm  [1] is not building in mock ? I ran > mock filename.srpm Will it work in COPR, Koji ? [1] https://avigne.fedorapeople.org/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc35.src.rpm

[Bug 2049725] New: Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.149

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049725 Bug ID: 2049725 Summary: Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.149 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Config-Model Assignee: david.hanneq...@gmail.com

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 4:18:29 PM CET Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 16:07:38 +0100, Alain Vigne wrote: > > Can someone explain to me why my .srpm [1] > > is not building in mock ? > > > > I ran > > > mock filename.srpm > > Have you had a chance to look at the mock man page,

[Bug 2049238] perl-Devel-PPPort-3.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049238 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wednesday, February 2, 2022 4:07:38 PM CET Alain Vigne wrote: > Can someone explain to me why my .srpm [1] > is not building in mock ? > > I ran > > mock filename.srpm You did not provide the build logs. > Will it work in COPR, Koji ? > > [1]

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

Hello Ankur On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 4:18 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 16:07:38 +0100, Alain Vigne wrote: > > Can someone explain to me why my .srpm [1] > > is not building in mock ? > > > > I ran > > > mock filename.srpm > > Have you had a chance to look at the mock man page, or

Re: mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 16:07:38 +0100, Alain Vigne wrote: > Can someone explain to me why my  .srpm  [1] > is not building in mock ? > > I ran > > mock filename.srpm Have you had a chance to look at the mock man page, or this wiki page?

[Bug 1811577] perl-Finance-Quote EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811577 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from

mock, %{buildroot}, fc35

Can someone explain to me why my .srpm [1] is not building in mock ? I ran > mock filename.srpm Will it work in COPR, Koji ? [1] https://avigne.fedorapeople.org/libfungw-1.2.0-1.fc35.src.rpm TIA -- Alain V. ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 2036125] Please branch and build perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-LibXML for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036125 --- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth --- perl-Web-Scraper has now been built: epel8: perl-Web-Scraper-0.38-13.el8 (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8dc161c1a7) epel9: perl-Web-Scraper-0.38-13.el9

[Bug 2036126] Please branch and build perl-Web-Scraper for EPEL-8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036126 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)

On 2/2/22 05:19 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 01. 02. 22 19:45, przemek klosowski wrote: On 2/1/22 12:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works,

Mock v2.16 release, mock-core-configs v37

Hello folks. I know the current Mock+configs Bodhi updates have not meet stable so far. The main problem being resolved is that 'fedpkg mockbuild' on 'epel8' checked-out branch doesn't work properly ATM. I was informed by @onosek (maintainer, in CC) that fedpkg/rpkg release is being prepared

[Bug 1595182] Please update perl-Mouse version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595182 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug 2008971] perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2008971 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED

[Bug 2049238] perl-Devel-PPPort-3.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049238 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 2046802] perl: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f36

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046802 --- Comment #7 from Jitka Plesnikova --- I temporarily turned off running those two test cases for ppc64le to be able to build perl. perl-5.34.0-484.fc36 has been successfully built. I will continue to look for the cause of the error. --

[Bug 2048248] mod_perl-2.0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7e164a842a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7e164a842a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

Re: GNOME 42 builds for F36: use f36-gnome side tag

Thank you for using side tag. It was not always the case and it caused me quite some pain. Vít Dne 02. 02. 22 v 10:11 David King napsal(a): Hi all I am looking after GNOME builds this release cycle, as Kalev is away, and I have requested a side tag for building GNOME packages intended

[Bug 2048248] mod_perl-2.0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-21b63657e5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-21b63657e5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2048248] mod_perl-2.0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-7d342a4167 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-7d342a4167 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2048248] mod_perl-2.0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- At the end all the fixes are patches we already have in Fedora. The only difference is a better documentation for contributors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 2048248] mod_perl-2.0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||mod_perl-2.0.12-1.fc36

[Bug 2048248] mod_perl-2.0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras and EPELs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248

[Bug 2048248] mod_perl-2.0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2048248 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

I contacted Rahul and he made me a co-maintainer on the chocolate-doom package. I've pushed a commit that fixes the build failures and updates the package from v3.0.0 to v3.0.1. The builds for rawhide, f35 and f34 had finished and have been submitted to bodhi. A.FI.

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 3:41 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 02. 02. 22 10:41, Parag Nemade wrote: > > I have submitted PR > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/impallari-raleway-fonts/pull-request/2 > > < > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/impallari-raleway-fonts/pull-request/2> > > > which

Re: Fwd: conditional require (RPM dependency solving puzzle)

On 01. 02. 22 19:45, przemek klosowski wrote: On 2/1/22 12:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: Thanks to Steven, Stephen and Miro for finding this solution. Still, having to add flags and deleting the existing doc package is not completely gruntling---it works, but it's not automatic and, for the future,

  1   2   >