On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 03:39:42PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> == How To Test ==
>
> Install using the ISO or the disk image on aarch64 system. The system
> should work as it should be by manually installing on top of any
> existing aarch64 system.
Does our QA have the necessary resources
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 5:15 PM Tom Rix wrote:
> Sorry, I did not run into the freeglut-devel problem with the manual build
>
I think I have something funny going on with the conditionals. Initially
they were negative conditionals:
%if ! 0%{?bootstrap} || ! 0%{?rhel}
%global docs 1
%global
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137926
pj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edited ---
Sorry, I did not run into the freeglut-devel problem with the manual build
I am using rhel 9.1, from poking around, i see there is a problem that
it is missing only on rhel 9.0.
I am not sure of how to fix without ifdef-ing out for all rhel 9.
I am assuming there is a knob in ocio that makes
Because of the openssl blocker, we are targeting 15 November. See the
Fedora Magazine article for more information behind the reasoning:
https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-linux-37-update/
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. gnome-calendar — Editing the
Until the issues with OCIO can be fixed or worked around, I went ahead and
submitted an update for the bootstrap build of OIIO since it may still be
useful even without OCIO and I didn't want to leave it in limbo.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1297e820b2
Thanks,
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], F37 Final release candidate 3 was
declared NO-GO. Because of the upcoming OpenSSL critical vulnerability
disclosure, we are pushing the next target date out a week. See the
Fedora Magazine article[2] for more information.
The next Fedora Linux 37 Final Go/No-Go
Due to outstanding blocker bugs[1], F37 Final release candidate 3 was
declared NO-GO. Because of the upcoming OpenSSL critical vulnerability
disclosure, we are pushing the next target date out a week. See the
Fedora Magazine article[2] for more information.
The next Fedora Linux 37 Final Go/No-Go
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-10-26/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-10-26-16.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2022-10-26/fedora_coreos_meeting.2022-10-26-16.30.txt
Log:
Great, thank you guys, looking forward for it.(I mistyped FC35 but meant FC36, not working with FC35 and not aware what's the state there.) 27.10.2022, 10:17, "Jiri Olsa" :On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 07:45:39AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: +Jiri in To Dave Stux wrote on Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at
On 27-10-2022 17:25, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 10. 22 19:40, Sandro wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the ImportError from subject specifically when
building python-plotnine for f36 (Python 3.10.7).
Yes, importing from .conftest in tests should not be possible.
The same package builds fine for f37
On 26. 10. 22 19:40, Sandro wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the ImportError from subject specifically when building
python-plotnine for f36 (Python 3.10.7).
Yes, importing from .conftest in tests should not be possible.
The same package builds fine for f37 and rawhide (Python 3.11.0).
Maybe pytest
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 09:33:34AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 07:06:43AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > == User Experience ==
> > > User experience does not change.
> >
> > "The new default for C standard is -c99. Users who want to use
> > an older
Dear rdflib maintainers,
A friendly reminder for the future to please notify the devel list and
maintainers of dependent packages (see below) *a week in advance* before
pushing major updates entailing ABI/API changes to rawhide [1].
The update has also made it into F37 without notification.
Hello and apologies for resurrecting an old thread.
I was looking for information regarding IMA in F37 and found it was asked
but I could not see any replies.
My question is exactly the same as the OP, I do not see security.ima
attributes on files after upgrading to F37.
OLD: Fedora-37-20221026.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20221027.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 9
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
I have both repos now and I have the bootstrap build of OIIO done.
The problem is OCIO. It looks like freeglut-devel is not available in EPEL
9. Also I found a dependency on openshadinglanguage I was previously
unaware of.
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 1:19 PM Jan Staněk wrote:
>
> Hi Jun,
>
> "Jun Aruga (he / him)" writes:
> > Do you have a plan to create the RPM package for wasi-sdk[1]?
>
> Not really, since we already (almost) have it available :)
>
> The wasi-sdk consists of llvm toolchain (clang & friends) compiled
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-HTML` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Add tests to gating
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-HTML/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-Writer` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Updates
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Writer/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-HTML` that you
are following:
``
Add tests to gating
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-HTML/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-XML-Writer` that
you are following:
``
Updates
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-XML-Writer/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On 27. 10. 22 11:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
micropython churchyard
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/micropython/pull-request/14
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
python-devel mailing list --
On 26. 10. 22 23:19, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
This list is not sorted, which makes it difficult to scan. Please also
provide the maintainers-by-package list that is usually sent for
changes that affect many packages.
Maintainers by package:
GConf2 alexl buc caillon caolanm
On 26. 10. 22 18:41, Maxwell G wrote:
On Wed Oct 26, 2022 at 12:41 +0200, Lumír Balhar wrote:
Since Python 2.0 (1994), Python provided a useful tool pathfix.py that
we use in Python RPM macros for fixing shebangs of Python modules and
some RPM packages use it as well directly in their specfiles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138013
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|ERRATA |RAWHIDE
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138017
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-HTML` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-HTML/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-IO-HTML` that you
are following:
``
Package tests and update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-IO-HTML/pull-request/1
___
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.44 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/24
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Tuesday, 25 October 2022 19:16:32 CEST Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
> > The issue with installing mailman3 might be due to sqlalchemy, though:
> > There is a 1.3 compat package but it conflicts with the update. If you
> > want to "rescue" mailman3 in f36 even though it is retired in rawhide
> > this
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that
you are following:
``
6.44 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/24
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-HTTP-Message` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
6.44 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/23
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that
you are following:
``
6.44 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/23
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138017
Michal Josef Spacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138013
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138013
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137675
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PDL-2.81.0-1.fc38
Dne 27. 10. 22 v 6:57 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
* Kevin Fenzi:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 10:23:40AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
More recently, I was explicitly told not to keep the compiler changes on
a branch in Fedora dist-git.
It is not really possible to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138013
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
40 matches
Mail list logo
