https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164678
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On Tue, 2023-01-24 at 15:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
> packages
> should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.
>
> 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164678
Bug ID: 2164678
Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.86 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-YAML-LibYAML
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162740
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-57561027e0 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162728
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-0bd6a91fd8 has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162728
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162740
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4bfde08e46
rubygem-git-1.13.0-1.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-a2ba6db56b
seamonkey-2.53.15-1.el8
0
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-afd7021128
ipython-3.2.3-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-08427e256d
seamonkey-2.53.15-1.el7
The following builds have
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are
following:
``
Thanks! BTW, I haven't tested this with slic3r yet. My rawhide VM is
segfaulting on boot. :(
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/2
churchyard commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you
are following:
``
Building perl-Wx-GLCanvas-0.09-34.fc38 for rawhide
Created task: 96686144
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96686144
``
To reply, visit the link below
churchyard merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Wx-GLCanvas` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list --
zuul commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are
following:
``
Build succeeded.
- [check-for-arches
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/5bea016a9e2e4e4eb314562c394638d9)
: SUCCESS in 1m 30s
- [rpm-scratch-build
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are
following:
``
@churchyard this can be merged + built now.
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/2
___
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 10:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! Just wanted to send out a heads-up for Rawhide users about
> some issues that have shown up in openQA testing.
>
> First, you may have found that trying to update to today's Rawhide
> fails like this:
>
> Error: Transaction
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:43 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I think we're fixed now. Here is the side tag & Bodhi update:
Thank you for taking care of that.
> - I have added support for rpmautospec
That's great.
> - There is now a cyclic dependency between ocaml-pp and ocaml-dune,
> which
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:58 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> FYI debuginfo generation failed on several packages. I've had to
> disable it on a few to get around this. For example:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96625872
>
KiCad will shortly be upgraded from 6.0.11 to 7.0.0-rc2 in Rawhide.
Designs created with KiCad 6 and earlier are readable / editable by KiCad 7.
However, once a design is saved with KiCad 7, it will no longer be readable by
KiCad 6 or earlier.
Steve
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/XI2QFIRCUJGX2FMEJ5K6ILLXOIWBGBIN/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/ptyprocess-0.7.0-py3.11.egg-info from
install of python3-ptyprocess-0.7.0-2.fc38.noarch conflicts with file from
package python3-ptyprocess-0.7.0-1.fc38.noarch
___
devel mailing
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 10:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> The second issue is that systems that update to systemd-253~rc1-1.fc38
> seem to get stuck on boot. With Plymouth enabled you just see the
> splash screen. With it disabled (or by pressing esc) it seems to be
> stuck at "Stopped
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 03:45:35PM +0100, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result.
> > > Nevertheless,
> > > given this would be used just
Hey folks! Just wanted to send out a heads-up for Rawhide users about
some issues that have shown up in openQA testing.
First, you may have found that trying to update to today's Rawhide
fails like this:
Error: Transaction test error:
file
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:12:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
...snip...
> Alternately, why does an older build block a push to stable? Won't
> the old build simply be ignored if there's a higher NVR version
> around?
Nope, koji and pungi have no idea about 'older' or 'newer', they only
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 17:42 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:01:17PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > > I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:01:17PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> >On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular case,
> >>but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is
Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:45 Jaroslav Skarvada napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result. Nevertheless,
given this would be used just for side-tags, is there a chance to
Dne 25. 01. 23 v 15:59 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular case,
but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is unfortunate :/
Can you elaborate on why you feel that way?
I don't trust
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:56 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular case,
> but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is unfortunate :/
Can you elaborate on why you feel that way?
josh
___
devel
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are
following:
``
@spot , Can you please build this in rawhide now?
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:13 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result. Nevertheless,
> > given this would be used just for side-tags, is there a chance to exclude
> > side
> > tags from the policy? Who
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:12:47PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> How do you edit the list of builds (to remove a build)? I cannot see
> any way to do this in the UI.
Thanks Mamoru Tasaka for editing it.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2023/01/25 22:12:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:22:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:43:50AM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The following comment has been added to the alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38
apron-0.9.13-16.fc38 [...] update:
On 1/25/23 13:04, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>
>> IQmoljussilehtola
>
> I'm leaving this comment in case Susi (Cc) didn't get the previous
> mail like last time. I know that they're working with
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 11:22:18AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:43:50AM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > The following comment has been added to the alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38
> > apron-0.9.13-16.fc38 [...] update:
> >
> > bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:43:50.440400
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:38 PM Pete Walter wrote:
>
> I am not happy about dropping Fedora packages in favor of upstream Flatpaks
> either.
>
> Can you assign the package to me instead of retiring it? I can get it updated
> so we can keep it in Fedora.
It looks like Bottles itself doesn't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162854
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-URI-Title-1.903-1.fc38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162740
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-57561027e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-57561027e0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-URI-Title` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
1.903 bump; Package tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-URI-Title/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162740
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-b0d17187a5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-b0d17187a5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162740
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Seems as bad practice to drop packages by upstream request.
ср, 25 янв. 2023 г. в 14:38, Pete Walter :
>
> I am not happy about dropping Fedora packages in favor of upstream Flatpaks
> either.
>
> Can you assign the package to me instead of retiring it? I can get it updated
> so we can keep it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162728
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-0bd6a91fd8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-0bd6a91fd8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
glibc-2.36.9000-24.fc38 should fix this assertion failure:
Fatal glibc error: printf_buffer_as_file.c:31 (__printf_buffer_as_file_commit):
assertion failed: file->stream._IO_write_ptr <= file->next->write_end
It's a logic bug in the fortified implementation of the sprintf family
of functions.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162728
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162728
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-URI-Title` that
you are following:
``
1.903 bump; Package tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-URI-Title/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
I am not happy about dropping Fedora packages in favor of upstream Flatpaks either. Can you assign the package to me instead of retiring it? I can get it updated so we can keep it in Fedora. Pete 25.01.2023, 10:56, "Vít Ondruch" :I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular
On 25. 01. 23 12:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
proposal was
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:43:50AM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> The following comment has been added to the alt-ergo-2.3.3-5.fc38
> apron-0.9.13-16.fc38 [...] update:
>
> bodhi - 2023-01-25 10:43:50.440400 (karma: 0)
> This update cannot be pushed to stable. These builds
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> > >
> > > NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
> > > proposal was submitted after the deadline because
On 24. 01. 23 18:57, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:50 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
NOTE: As explained by the owners in the Feedback section below, this
proposal was submitted after the deadline because the impact of the
package update proved to be broader than anticipated.
On 25. 01. 23 11:50, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result. Nevertheless,
given this would be used just for side-tags, is there a chance to exclude side
tags from the policy? Who would handle such request?
Although being able to modify one macro means
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 3:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> IQmoljussilehtola
I'm leaving this comment in case Susi (Cc) didn't get the previous
mail like last time. I know that they're working with upstream to
package the next version of IQmol, so this
I am not user of Bottles so I won't complain about this particular case,
but the push towards (upstream) Flatpaks is unfortunate :/
Vít
Dne 24. 01. 23 v 22:44 Sandro napsal(a):
Hi,
Development of Bottles is moving fast and we have been struggling to
keep up with upstream releases,
On 24. 01. 23 17:21, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 01. 23 16:20, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 23. 01. 23 15:39, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
F36: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-d823c8dfb8
F37: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-8362bcf475
One package which is known
On 25. 01. 23 11:16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 04:20:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['unzip', '-t',
'/builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.12.0a4/build/debug/build/test_python_64979æ/tmpau1avwr6/archive.zip']'
returned non-zero
Reading the thread, I was afraid this will be the end result.
Nevertheless, given this would be used just for side-tags, is there a
chance to exclude side tags from the policy? Who would handle such request?
Although being able to modify one macro means also possibility to edit
all macros.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 04:20:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['unzip', '-t',
> '/builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.12.0a4/build/debug/build/test_python_64979æ/tmpau1avwr6/archive.zip']'
> returned non-zero exit status 80.
> **Unzip Output**
> Archive:
>
I think we're fixed now. Here is the side tag & Bodhi update:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0=62208=-build_id=1
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-7bd037f981
- - -
Here are the scripts I used to do the build, including the custom
make-like tool (called
Unfortunately we have tried to use 'koji edit-tag SIDETAG -x
%_with_bootstrap=1' command but it always ended with 'koji:
ActionNotAllowed: tag permission required (logged in as USER)' even when
creator of the sidetag used the command.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On
61 matches
Mail list logo
