Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

On 2023-02-21 20:19, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: It is generally unsafe to assume the version number to be in any specific format. I'm not sure if that means that you are opposed to the proposal, or to the idea of truncating the version numbers, or something else entirely.  :) you can

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I fear the only way to fix it is to get pungi to merge entire repos, and > I don't think thats anything that pungi wants to be on the hook for > doing. But there are more things than just DeltaRPMs it could be useful for. E.g., I remember that in ancient times (pre

Re: FTBFS bug filed, build already deleted

Julian Sikorski wrote: > FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1]. Unfortunately, the corresponding > build [2] has already been deleted. This is not ideal from maintainer > perspective as it effectively is a bug with no info provided whatsoever. > Not to mention being quite wasteful from the

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

Gordon Messmer wrote: > As there is some discussion of whether the ELF dependency generator > should use the full version string presented by the library file name's > suffix, or should assume a SemVer-style major.minor and truncate the > requirement to the first two dot-separated numbers,

Re: Creating a F37 remix/spin LiveCD without a desktop environment

Thank you. I was not aware of nodm, so this is interesting. However, I understand that nodm will automatically start an X session at system boot. I really do not want that, except in the LiveCD. As I mentioned in a post, I do not understand why lightdm (in my example) was not starting.

Re: Creating a F37 remix/spin LiveCD without a desktop environment

On Tue, 2023-02-21 at 16:34 +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > > > Thanks for this. But this is separate. I was wondering how do I > create a LiveCD without a login display manager? you got nodm package and maybe could help you this article

Re: Creating a F37 remix/spin LiveCD without a desktop environment

Looking at the i3 desktop kickstart file, I tried using lightdm (just to see how I fare): %post systemctl enable lightdm # xfce configuration # create /etc/sysconfig/desktop (needed for installation) cat > /etc/sysconfig/desktop < wrote: I put the following here, in case anyone

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2/21/23 17:13, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 04:44:31PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote: >> So do we kill it for: >> >> F39/F40 and beyond? >> F38 and beyond? >> X-date and all releases? > > My normal response would be... well, I missed the F38 change deadline by a > wide

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

Otto Liljalaakso kirjoitti 21.2.2023 klo 11.45: Kenneth Goldman kirjoitti 14.2.2023 klo 21.19: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_ GNU_Hello/ Working through the basic tutorial there: fedpkg --release f37 mockbuild fails with Failed to get repository

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2/21/23 16:44, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 15:48, Matthew Miller > wrote: > >> I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a >> priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere... >> >> >>

Claim ownership of python-pydispatcher

Following the process of https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/, I'd like to claim the ownership of the python-pydispatcher package; it's a dependency of one of my packages to install It, so I'd like to maintain it

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 04:44:31PM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > So do we kill it for: > > F39/F40 and beyond? > F38 and beyond? > X-date and all releases? My normal response would be... well, I missed the F38 change deadline by a wide margin, so F39+. But, I think we could stop producing

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 03:48:06PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a > priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere... > >

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 15:48, Matthew Miller wrote: > I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a > priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere... > > >

F38 Change complete (100% complete) deadline today

As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners can indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracker to the ON_QA state. F38 enters beta freeze today. Any updates that need to land in the beta release will require an approved freeze exception or beta blocker. The current beta target

F38 Change complete (100% complete) deadline today

As of today, F38 Changes should be 100% complete. Change owners can indicate this by setting the Bugzilla tracker to the ON_QA state. F38 enters beta freeze today. Any updates that need to land in the beta release will require an approved freeze exception or beta blocker. The current beta target

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

Got it.  Leslie Satenstein On Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 03:48:23 p.m. EST, Matthew Miller wrote: I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere...

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On 2/21/23 15:53, Fabio Valentini wrote: It's been a long, long, time since any dnf transaction I ran printed positive news about deltarpms ... most of the time there either aren't any, or using them actually increased data download. A recent transaction went so poorly that it prompted me to

Re: Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:48 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a > priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere... > >

Proposal: drop delta rpms (for real this time)

I was asked to weigh in on https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7215 as a priority. Last time we talked about this we didn't really get anywhere... https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JYKVELSBJQMEK6KEFXG354ZDZDDX4C5G/#RLEUYSWOUVUS53YAP7WQQNN7HNEBIC4E ...

Re: Note section size too big (was: Re: FTBFS bug filed, build already deleted)

Am 21.02.23 um 15:42 schrieb Lukas Zaoral: On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:19 PM Julian Sikorski > wrote: > > Am 20.02.23 um 19:14 schrieb Orion Poplawski: > > On 2/20/23 10:46, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski

[Bug 2171353] /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req create bogus requirements on usage function of dpkg-source.pl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171353 Sergio Basto changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(ser...@serjux.com | |)

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230221.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230220.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230221.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 30 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 173 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 38.37 MiB Size of dropped packages

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2023-02-21)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCo (2023-02-21) === Meeting started by decathorpe at 17:00:46 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-02-21/fesco.2023-02-21-17.00.log.html Meeting summary

[EPEL-devel] Re: Packages for PHP 8.1

On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 at 12:40, Joseph Christopher Sible wrote: > Hello, > > > > I have a RHEL 9 system running PHP 8.1 from the Red Hat AppStream module. > I tried to install php-sodium and php-pecl-imagick from EPEL 9 on it, but > DNF gave an error that basically said those packages only work

[EPEL-devel] Packages for PHP 8.1

Hello, I have a RHEL 9 system running PHP 8.1 from the Red Hat AppStream module. I tried to install php-sodium and php-pecl-imagick from EPEL 9 on it, but DNF gave an error that basically said those packages only work with PHP 8.0. Would it be possible to provide versions of those packages

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

On 2023-02-21 08:57, Gordon Messmer wrote: If it were an addition, we have the option of making the system more compatible with existing packages than the current proposal by using a rich dependency. ...I forgot to mention: I also wonder what adding a new dependency would do to the memory

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

On 2023-02-20 11:48, Gordon Messmer wrote: Looking at this result, I think I see one bug and one RFE. Should I report those in bugzilla, and if so, against what component? I want to add: If someone points me toward the right repo, I can work on both of those.

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

On 2023-02-20 10:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Does it have to be something which looks so much like it might be a version number? For example it could be helpful for debugging if the generated requires was something like: Requires: libnghttp2.so.14()(64bit) >= soname.14.24.1 or:

[Bug 2168142] Add perl-Carp-Always to EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168142 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Creating a F37 remix/spin LiveCD without a desktop environment

Thanks for this. But this is separate. I was wondering how do I create a LiveCD without a login display manager? On Tuesday, February 21, 2023 at 07:59:27 AM CST, Sandro wrote: On 20-02-2023 22:09, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: > I would be happy to unretire it if that is possible.

Schedule for Tuesday's (Today's) FESCo Meeting (2023-02-21)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2023-02-21 17:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

F39 proposal: MinGW toolchain update (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39MingwEnvToolchainUpdate This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering

F39 proposal: MinGW toolchain update (System-Wide Change proposal)

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39MingwEnvToolchainUpdate This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering

[Bug 2169300] Add perl-Clipboard to EPEL9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2169300 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- Xavier, if you don't have time, I can help you maintaining this package in EPEL9. My Fedora name is ppisar. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2023-02-22 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #topic aloha

Re: Note section size too big (was: Re: FTBFS bug filed, build already deleted)

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:19 PM Julian Sikorski wrote: > > Am 20.02.23 um 19:14 schrieb Orion Poplawski: > > On 2/20/23 10:46, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 6:43 PM Julian Sikorski > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> FTBFS bug was filed against mame [1].

Re: Creating a F37 remix/spin LiveCD without a desktop environment

On 20-02-2023 22:09, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: I would be happy to unretire it if that is possible. It is: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list --

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

* Florian Weimer: > But I really don't get why read-only access to the RPM database during > the build is so problematic. I don't see how it can be worse than what > we do with package notes. It occurred to me that it's probably to avoid a requirement for bootstrap chroot. Without

[Bug 2171927] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171927 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-c779bc79b8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-c779bc79b8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2171927] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171927 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-955263a37a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-955263a37a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2171927] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20230220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171927 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 9:40 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:56:30AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 2023-02-20 10:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >Does it have to be something which looks so much like it might be a > > >version number? For example it could be

[Bug 2171938] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171938 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-949f2b5140 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-949f2b5140 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2171938] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171938 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-6bc7a45238 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-6bc7a45238 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2171938] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230220 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171938 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 2171353] /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req create bogus requirements on usage function of dpkg-source.pl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171353 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ser...@serjux.com

[Bug 2171353] /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req create bogus requirements on usage function of dpkg-source.pl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171353 --- Comment #5 from Michal Josef Spacek --- Created attachment 1945489 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1945489=edit Fix requires from perl-generators -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 2171353] /usr/lib/rpm/perl.req create bogus requirements on usage function of dpkg-source.pl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2171353 --- Comment #4 from Jitka Plesnikova --- (In reply to Sergio Basto from comment #2) > I tried yesterday without success fixed the regexp , adding more one simple > rule, lines or comnand must be ended with semi-colon (;) , > if you can add

GHC 9.2 is now in F38 and Rawhide

I am pleased to announce the arrival of ghc version 9 (9.2.6) and Haskell packages based on Stackage LTS 20 versions in Rawhide and F38 . This landed in f38 and f39 today for

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

Vít Ondruch kirjoitti 15.2.2023 klo 12.21: Dne 14. 02. 23 v 20:19 Kenneth Goldman napsal(a): https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_ GNU_Hello/ I wish this was update to suggest to create git repository right from start. BTW I think that fedpkg

Re: fedpkg: Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl

Kenneth Goldman kirjoitti 14.2.2023 klo 21.19: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_ GNU_Hello/ Working through the basic tutorial there: fedpkg --release f37 mockbuild fails with Failed to get repository name from Git url or pushurl Failed to get ns

Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 10:56:30AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-02-20 10:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >Does it have to be something which looks so much like it might be a > >version number? For example it could be helpful for debugging if the > >generated requires was something like: