The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-4821639cb4
chromium-112.0.5615.49-1.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-fca191b57e
libyang-2.0.164-2.el7
The following builds
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
28 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-1e00c3d01e
cutter-re-2.2.0-1.el8 rizin-0.5.1-1.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-8c1df52e87
chromium-112.0.5615.49-1.el8
1
The Fedora Linux 38 Final RC 1.6 compose is GO and will be shipped on
Tuesday, 18 April. For more information please check the
Go/No-Go meeting minutes[1][2] or log[3][4].
[1]
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-04-13/f38_final_gono-go_meeting.2023-04-13-17.05.html
[2]
The Fedora Linux 38 Final RC 1.6 compose is GO and will be shipped on
Tuesday, 18 April. For more information please check the
Go/No-Go meeting minutes[1][2] or log[3][4].
[1]
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2023-04-13/f38_final_gono-go_meeting.2023-04-13-17.05.html
[2]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186241
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186355
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate RC-1.6 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186241
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
Hello!
The latest babl-0.1.102 update in rawhide [1] introduces an unannounced
API break. It no longer ships babl.pc and included babl-0.1.pc instead,
which means any application trying to detect it using pkg-config will
fail. This causes, for example, gimp to FTBFS:
...
configure:24501: checking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186355
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-ea9222b0f7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ea9222b0f7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186355
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Archive-Tar-3.02-1.fc3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2186355
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 12:48:01 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 12. 04. 23 v 17:40 stan via devel napsal(a):
> > On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:39:44 +0200
> > Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >> What about using `~/.bash_logout` to avoid the need of `hx`?
> > I had to do some research to even understand what
> On 13 Apr 2023, at 16:13, Barry wrote:
>
>
>
>>> On 12 Apr 2023, at 16:40, stan via devel
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:39:44 +0200
>>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>
>>> Dne 11. 04. 23 v 18:02 stan via devel napsal(a):
I have the following defined in .bashrc:
> On 12 Apr 2023, at 16:40, stan via devel
> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:39:44 +0200
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Dne 11. 04. 23 v 18:02 stan via devel napsal(a):
>>>
>>> I have the following defined in .bashrc:
>>>
>>> # this logs the history explicitly before exiting a shell
>>> hx
OLD: Fedora-38-20230412.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230413.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Dne 12. 04. 23 v 17:40 stan via devel napsal(a):
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:39:44 +0200
Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 11. 04. 23 v 18:02 stan via devel napsal(a):
I have the following defined in .bashrc:
# this logs the history explicitly before exiting a shell
hx ()
{
history -a;
exit;
}
It
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:21 AM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, 10:28 Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 13. 04. 23 10:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> > yesterday I created my first package repository:
>> >
>> >
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, 10:28 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 13. 04. 23 10:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > yesterday I created my first package repository:
> >
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Atomes
> >
> > I used the command (that you all must be familiar with):
> >
> > fedpkg
On 13. 04. 23 10:49, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 13/04/23 10:27, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
In http://bugzilla.redhat.com/2130607 the reviewer should have noted this and
not approve the package.
Why? The "full lowercase naming" is no more a MUST:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:35:31PM -0400, Jonathan Lebon wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:05 PM Colin Walters wrote:
> > Looks like this broke our mounting of zram:
> >
> > https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/1462
I don't think it's related to the new API. libblkid is not
Il 13/04/23 10:27, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
>
> In http://bugzilla.redhat.com/2130607 the reviewer should have noted this and
> not approve the package.
>
Why? The "full lowercase naming" is no more a MUST:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_general_naming
Mattia
On 4/13/23 11:29, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
>
> Le 13/04/2023 à 10:26, Benson Muite a écrit :
>> On 4/13/23 11:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>> yesterday I created my first package repository:
>>>
>> Congratulations!
> Thank you so much, this is kind of exciting !
>> i) retire the
On 13. 04. 23 10:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
Dear all,
yesterday I created my first package repository:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Atomes
I used the command (that you all must be familiar with):
fedpkg request-repo Atomes 2130607
After a first try using "atomes" that did not work,
On 4/13/23 11:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
> Dear all,
> yesterday I created my first package repository:
>
Congratulations!
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Atomes
>
> I used the command (that you all must be familiar with):
>
> fedpkg request-repo Atomes 2130607
>
> After a first try
Dear all,
yesterday I created my first package repository:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/Atomes
I used the command (that you all must be familiar with):
fedpkg request-repo Atomes 2130607
After a first try using "atomes" that did not work, indeed fedpkg requested
the keyword to be
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 38 Candidate RC-1.5 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
27 matches
Mail list logo
