Re: dnf group and dnf group list diff ?

no, is not my job 2017-02-27 14:23 GMT+02:00 Honza Silhan : > Hi, > > it seems like a bug. > > Can you please report a bug here [1], include whole output of `dnf > group`, `dnf group summary`, `dnf list` and `cat > /var/lib/dnf/groups.json`? > > > Thanks, > Honza > > [1]

Re: dnf group and dnf group list diff ?

sorry, my message came from this reasons: 1. I'm new into devel list and development under Fedora. 2. is a common issue under Fedora update by real developers how works with dnf. 3. I find something into google search about hidden groups but I'm not sure that is true into this bug. into last few

bug report of fedmsg

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436656 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

fedora development - android error gradle wrapper .

I used this https://developer.fedoraproject.org/start/sw/mobile-app/mobile-devassistant.html This part from tutorial is wrong: [devassistant]$ cp -r /home/$USER/.devassistant/files/crt/android-studio/. "my_test" INFO: For import project into Android Studio execute command: I used this:

DevAssistant not working - YUMPackageManager

This is a bug ? DEBUG: YUMPackageManager not operational - can't import yum. INFO: Checking for presence of ant... DEBUG: rpm -q --whatprovides "ant" DEBUG: ant-1.9.6-3.fc24.noarch DEBUG: 0 INFO: Found ant-1.9.6-3.fc24.noarch INFO: Checking for presence of glibc... DEBUG: rpm -q --whatprovides

devassistant-gui - not working python gi - Gtk

[mythcat@localhost ~]$ devassistant-gui /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/devassistant/gui/__init__.py:19: PyGIWarning: Gtk was imported without specifying a version first. Use gi.require_version('Gtk', '3.0') before import to ensure that the right version gets loaded. from gi.repository import

builder and dnf cairo_snippets problems

Hi. [root@localhost mythcat]# dnf search Builder | grep gnome gnome-builder-devel.x86_64 : Development files for gnome-builder gnome-builder-devel.i686 : Development files for gnome-builder gnome-builder.x86_64 : IDE for writing GNOME-based software gnome-builder.i686 : IDE for writing

Re: Fedmsg notifications not work with this options

reported issue to https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg-notify/issues/29 :) maybe I will got a badge 2017-03-16 12:49 GMT+02:00 Cătălin George Feștilă <catalinf...@gmail.com>: > Need to fix links from fedmsg-notify-config > > I think is need to fix this into package the core

Re: Fedmsg notifications not work with this options

GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com>: > > On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:14 +0200, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > > Hi, > > The Fedmsg not work so I think that will need to be fix. > > > > 1. The settings come with options to set Fedora Elections but link is

last Spyder IDE under Fedora from Spyder 2.3.9 to the last

the problem with build from source under Fedora distro of the last Spyder IDE https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/4318 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

try to build the python module: PyXPCOM with errors

I used this page to build : https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Build_Instructions/Building_PyXPCOM#Compiling_Mozilla The error I got come from the last part: make See error result [root@localhost build]# ls configconfig.log dist mozilla-config.h

Re: try to build the python module: PyXPCOM with errors

I try to build the pyxpcom nope [root@localhost mythcat]# dnf install xulrunner-devel Last metadata expiration check: 2:50:44 ago on Fri Mar 10 15:05:41 2017. Package xulrunner-devel-44.0-9.fc25.x86_64 is already installed, skipping. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! maybe is

Re: the torch - bash install-deps

the cool think of development is time -> " On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Robert-André Mauchin <zebo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On jeudi 12 octobre 2017 17:38:39 CEST Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > > Hi teams . > > > > I report a issue about torch, see : >

Questions about security of Fedora distro dnf update hack.

Maybe this will help the team development or not , but is good to know . This issue about security and hack, I got many changes and bad result : - I run fedora on virtual box ; - I got a grub error entry when I try to update the Fedora with dnf: Problems can be see into this screenshots:

the torch - bash install-deps

Hi teams . I report a issue about torch, see : https://github.com/torch/torch7/issues/1085 the main reason is: bash install-deps . As you know: Torch is a scientific computing framework with wide support for machine learning algorithms that puts GPUs first. It is easy to use and efficient,

about ssl certificate transparency .

Hi. I read about this issue: https://www.certificate-transparency.org/what-is-ct and chrome https://www.certificate-transparency.org/certificate-transparency-in-chrome I want to know if the ssh from fedora account can be used in same way? Thank you. Best regards.

Re: lxqt install group environment - bug ?

or come from bad package lxqt . On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 3:04 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote: > Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > > I try to install lxqt desktop group environment > > I use the last Fedora Server image from Fedora > > > > The error on

lxqt install group environment - bug ?

I try to install lxqt desktop group environment I use the last Fedora Server image from Fedora The error on default user point to xorg error : xf86EnableIOPorts - EGL_MESA_drm_image require This is strange because the lxde desktop environment group running well on machine. Maybe is a bug ?

F28: maybe a bug on report dnf and env outputs

the command : $ dnf grouplist -v show mw I have this: Installed Groups: custom-environment, minimal-environment, xfce-desktop-environment, basic-desktop-environment The env command show me most KDE variables and run the KDE environment XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=KDE The Fedora 28 start with plasma KDE

bug submited on F28 compilation rpc.h

this is the bug submited by mythcat : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562347 please take a look and give me the badge :) Best regards ! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

CVE-2018-14665 : Xorg X Server Vulnerabilities

https://www.securepatterns.com/2018/10/cve-2018-14665-xorg-x-server.html ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: CVE-2018-14665 : Xorg X Server Vulnerabilities

Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Cătălin George Feștilă said: > > Thank you! > > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 4:38 PM Reindl Harald > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Am 01.11.18 um 15:33 schrieb Cătălin George Feștilă: > > > > >

Re: CVE-2018-14665 : Xorg X Server Vulnerabilities

Thank you! On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 4:38 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 01.11.18 um 15:33 schrieb Cătălin George Feștilă: > > https://www.securepatterns.com/2018/10/cve-2018-14665-xorg-x-server.html > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID > Targeted r

Re: CVE-2018-14665 : Xorg X Server Vulnerabilities

+1 SELinux and policy rules. I open this. I don't start an "'wich hunting" on specific topics. I think the problem is still in working with SETID and SELinux rules. ( this is not the only way to solve the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID) Will be great if we know how

gedit: error while loading shared libraries: libpeas-gtk-1.0.so.0

I used F28 interface to update to F29 the result is ok , but today I found this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647544 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Resurrection of the NeuroFedora SIG

Good to know. A good article post at Fedora Magazin will be more useful. On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 4:24 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/NeuroFedora > > I've recently resurrected the NeuroFedora SIG. Many thanks to Igor and > the others who'd worked on it in

packages for chat limited repo

I try to install gyachi.x86_64 but I got errors. A full search gives just some packages, I don't know if this is a bug or a repo limited area. see my output. root@desk mythcat]# dnf install gyachi.x86_64 Last metadata expiration check: 0:16:07 ago on Tue 18 Dec 2018 07:33:15 PM EET. Error:

qbs and qt-creator.x86_64 - error of implementation ?

I try to see if my issue can be found on the internet and I try fedora chat without results. I try to use qbs with qt-creator.x86_64 to use the slate software. The problem can be the implementation of qbs and qt-creator.x86_64 Because I'm not very good with this tool I need some help. See my

Re: packages for chat limited repo

ătălin George Feștilă wrote: > > > I try to install gyachi.x86_64 but I got errors. > > A full search gives just some packages, I don't know if this is a bug > > or a repo limited area. see my output. > > > > root@desk mythcat]# dnf install gyachi.x86_64 > >

Re: packages for chat limited repo

Read all error (Problem: conflicting requests) and my dnf search (not xchat) is reported like : I don't like flame. On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 3:30 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > On Wednesday, 19 December 2018 at 14:25, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > > Can the probl

provider bad repo (network) or bug development ?

Dear team. Take a look at my output ( see time and bad response of dnf tool versus kivi package) I don't sure it is a bug or development issue( the fedora.pkgs.org/29/ has a kivy package). I don't have many options to test it , but you can have a good image on it. Can be a clone or bad repo?

bug sandbox with Fedora 29 - many errors

Dear team Can you review my Fedora bug because come with many errors? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=163 I cannot find a good component to fill the bug, I add to: Component:sandbox-runner-data Thank's. Best Regards. ___ devel mailing

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Python means Python3

I already used Python 3.7.3 in Windows OS and is very good. On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 02. 07. 19 17:58, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 9:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> On 01. 07. 19 16:21, Peter Robinson wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at

Development Tools problems for build from source Krita.

I install 'Development Tools', but some tools are not in this group and PythonLibrary is not set. Any idea how to fix it? dnf group install 'Development Tools' dnf install cmake dnf install gcc-c++ See output of build from source for krita 4.2.8 [mythcat@localhost build]$ cmake

Re: Development Tools problems for build from source Krita.

yes ecm problem and cmake new version can you provide more help with this issue? thank you. [mythcat@localhost build]$ cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$HOME/krita-4.2.8-beta1/install $HOME/krita-4.2.8-beta1/build -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo -DPRODUCTSET=ALL -DPACKAGERS_BUILD=ON

error: error(-30986) getting "???" records from Requirename index:

I got this problem with my Fedora distro 31 index and I think this can be an issue on development team Error is this: [root@desk mythcat]# dnf install memtest86+.x86_64 Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:53 ago on Sun 26 Jan 2020 10:19:10 AM EET. Dependencies resolved.

Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo

It is a good idea to have a fast operating system when you buy a device. I don't think it will be bought like that due to the price in Europe. It was a Fedora wiki with hardware requirements, I don't know if it still exists. My opinion is that we still fit into this answer: What are the cheap

bug on display DPI , Component cinnamon.

I haven't completed a bug in a while. Now with the new badge system, I suspect it is even more complex to add to the contribution of each user. I did not find any indication of how to proceed for the badge. 1. Maybe someone will help me and tell me if I have to go somewhere else. 2. The bug can be

discord fedora .rpm and repo

Dear team Dear team. I would like to know if anyone took care of integrating the discord application in the Fedora distribution? Do we have a repo for this application? On the official website, I saw packet deb and tar. Thank you. ___ devel mailing

Re: [Test-Announce] [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.13 2021-07-11 through 2021-07-18

is this date? [root@desk mythcat]# koji list-builds --package=kernel --after="2021-07-01" BuildBuilt by State ---

PyQt6 to Fedora 35

Can we add PyQt6 to Fedora 35 repo? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: git push permission denied

also, you need to start the sshd service ... systemctl start sshd.service systemctl status sshd.service ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature

[root@desk mythcat]# dnf list fedora-gpg-keys Last metadata expiration check: 1:06:12 ago on Sat 13 Mar 2021 02:57:37 PM EET. Installed Packages fedora-gpg-keys.noarch [root@desk mythcat]# dnf repolist repo idrepo name WineHQ

Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature

and finally test works https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_kernel_regression : /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/srbds:Not affected /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort:Not affected [mythcat@desk kernel-tests]$ sudo semanage boolean -m --off selinuxuser_execheap

update kernel with error and BAD Signature

Any idea ? I try to follow this wiki page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-08_Kernel_5.11_Test_Week according with this article: https://fedoramagazine.org/contribute-at-the-fedora-audio-kernel-5-11-and-i18n-test-days/ This is the errors and BAD signature response : ...

Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature

[root@desk mythcat]# rpm --rebuilddb error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#8151 Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected c1c39a204c8615afaa00d00e81982e55c6ce1b0f88b9703de5fafebb5abe67a1 != 86dbba11d5da0b2ebb39edbd68719299e9a848c83b25c8235a27fd1d9d75d024) Header SHA1 digest: BAD (Expected

Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature

[root@desk mythcat]# rpm --rebuilddb error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#3860 Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected b9cf6988fce9f83cb6cbddc260ab4832a15af3e718884156e0c73ba344897c27 != f863601defc3132bc5a1b3d09f23b43ab76c6cf0400a0c1a487ea7b2f680f176) Header SHA1 digest: BAD (Expected

Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature

fix corruption of your rpm db ! the output of this command is changed : rpm --rebuilddb error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 8151 Header SHA256 digest: BAD ... I don't know if dnf update kernel-*.rpm fix this issue ___ devel mailing list --

compile a basic example to arm executable on Fedora

I try to create a hello word arm static executable, with the default example but I got these errors. I search on the web and fedora packages to find a way to solve this issue. I used a basic example source code: cat hello.c #include using namespace std; int main(void) { std::cout <<

Re: compile a basic example to arm executable on Fedora

I asked because I don't think arm development is well implemented. An answer would be as correct as possible from a developer who has worked with something like this, considering that it is not very well documented and I have not seen the tests with this tool that would work with development

strange output

I run this command on my root #cat /usr/bin/gcc ... and I got a large strange output ... What is this? Is it a bug? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: strange output

right , is a binary gcc on that folder ! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

vala error for any GTK+ source code

I wonder if the implementation of the libraries or settings package is not well defined. I used: sudo dnf groupinstall "Development Tools" "Development Libraries" I got this error after watching a video tutorial about Vala and GTK+ on ubuntu where this error does not appear. This is error:

bad error on console / shell ... any idea ! ?

I tried this command on the default Fedora installation... the TAB Key gave me this error: [root@fedora mythcat]# dnf5 search scV: __reassemble_comp_words_by_ref: command not found terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::invalid_argument' what(): stoi V:

Re: bad error on console / shell ... any idea ! ?

... maybe it is not completed and gets that error or it has not been tested finally ... yes , the development is fast in this moment and is much to do. you can see I used a kernel for devel : Linux fedora 6.9.0-0.rc1.20240327git7033999ecd7b.18.fc41.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Mar 27

Re: Python 3.8.0b1 is now available for testing

+1 Thanks On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 1:35 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Fedora 30: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-204584be85 > Fedora 29: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e77f7dbb32 > > Copr with the "python3" package updated (to use in mock): >