Re: Fedora 25 defaults to X instead of wayland

I seem to have a similar problem. My configuration *could* be mistakenly identified as hybrid graphics (Intel iGPU and Nvidia discrete GPU present), but the iGPU is explicitly disabled (in the UEFI configuration) and only the discrete GPU is used for rendering AND output. On fedora 24, I was

Self Introduction: Fabio Valentini (decathorpe)

Here goes my introduction as a new (or aspiring) package maintainer for fedora. I have been using fedora as my daily driver OS for some years now (I think starting with f18 or f19). Also, I have been learning to build RPM packages for some time, too - some of you may be familiar with my

Re: Self Introduction: Fabio Valentini (decathorpe)

Hello Dominik, Thanks for the welcome, and for sponsoring me! On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 7:35 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Hello, Fabio. > Welcome to Fedora community! > > On Thursday, 24 November 2016 at 22:34, Fabio Valentini wrote

becoming a co-maintainer of elementary-icon-theme

Hello Johannes, I am working on getting all the elementary apps and pantheon desktop components into fedora and wondered if you could approve my ACL Requests for becoming a co-maintaner of elementary-icon-theme (since that package obviously ties in with the other packages I am now maintaining,

becoming a co-maintainer of plank

Hello Wesley, I am working on getting all the elementary apps and pantheon desktop components into fedora and wondered if you could approve my ACL Requests for becoming a co-maintaner of plank (since that package is obviously also part of a Pantheon DE and ties in with the other packages I am

f25+: vala 0.34.x+ bug causing .vapi file generation for ALL CURRENT PACKAGE BUILDS to be possibly faulty

I has come to my attention that - since the update to vala from the 0.34.x series has made it into the fedora 25(+) repositories - every package that generates .vapi files during build might have done so incorrectly, because of the following bug, which is present in vala releases up to 0.34.3

Re: libdbusmenu upgrade in Fedora rawhide (and eventually in Fedora 26, 25)

Hi Simone, Updating libdbusmenu seems like a good idea - if you want help rebuilding dependent packages, I can take care of rebuilding my own packages once libdbusmenu is build successfully. My affected packages are (according to your list): appcenter, pantheon-files, pantheon-photos,

Review Swaps: (mostly) very simple golang packages

Hi everybody, I've been putting together package Review Requests for all the golang package dependencies of syncthing (an open source file synchronization service). Some of them have already been reviewed (thank you, Jan! I feel much more confident about my golang packaging now), but there are

pagure-over-dist-git: traceback in receive-hook when pushing to new repo

I've just pushed an import commit to my first repository that was created with fedrepo_req on pagure, and I got the following traceback from the remote when it obviously failed to run a post-receive hook: remote: Traceback (most recent call last): remote: File "./hooks/post-receive.default",

fedpkg new-sources broken?

Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do anything until I kill it ... I can't pin down the exact date it stopped working (since I

Re: fedpkg new-sources broken?

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 2017-07-14, Mamoru TASAKA <mtas...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> Fabio Valentini wrote on 07/14/2017 06:04 PM: >>> Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpk

Re: What is your opinion on "sudo pip" fix for Fedora 27?

If the "only" reason to change the current behavior is to prevent users from nuking their systems (be it by accident, or by following outdated instructions from the web), then why not prevent running "sudo pip" at all? Adding a small patch to pip to print an explanatory message ("This is unsafe,

Re: CI projects in Copr

Hi, As the maintainer of the Pantheon DE components and elementary apps, I have a setup that runs "nightly" builds of 59 of those packages in the "decathorpe/elementary-nightly" COPR repository for all supported fedora releases. This "CI-like" setup helps me catch upstream changes (that warrant

Review Swaps: Simple golang packages (for syncthing)

Hi everybody, I need somebody to take on the Review Requests of the only 3 golang dependencies that are still blocking a syncthing package: golang-github-cznic-zappy: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431743 golang-github-cznic-lldb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431745

Any plans for completing the go 1.9 rebase (to stable 1.9)?

According to the Change for F27 [0], all golang packages have been rebuilt against golang 1.9beta2. In the meantime, go 1.9 stable has been released upstream (Aug. 24, 2017) [1]. I suspect that some of the issues I am having with go / my golang packages in fedora would be fixed by the update to

How to handle broken dependencies in F27?

Hi, I've got two packages (gala, wingpanel) that have broken dependencies in F27 because of unfortunate timing: 1. GNOME 3.24 prerelease broke builds just in time for the mass rebuild, 2. upstream took a few days to come up with fixed support for GNOME 3.24, 3. I built fixed packages and they

Re: Kernel 4.13 rebase plans

For what it's worth: I just installed the 4.13.2 kernel from the kernel-stabilization repo, and the nvidia akmod module (from negativo17 repo) failed to build (as expected). But after rebooting with the new kernel, the system uses the fallback to nouveau correctly - without any manual

Re: Any plans for completing the go 1.9 rebase (to stable 1.9)?

On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:42 AM Jakub Cajka <jca...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > - Original Message ----- > > From: "Fabio Valentini" <decatho...@gmail.com> > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.f

golang-github-chmduquesne-rollinghash license change (MIT -> MIT and BSD) with 3.0.0

The license changes from "MIT" to "MIT and BSD" as of the newly released version 3.0.0, which has been built for rawhide and will make it to f27 and f26 if no problems with dependent packages (syncthing) arise. This has no real effect for fedora, since the changed license tag only arises from a

Re: Colm rawhide soname bump

"pro" .spec hack: This is why I hard-code library sonames in my packages (even if hardcoding is frowned upon in general, especially in .spec files, where macros are preferable) - but that way, a soname bump always gets noticed as it results in failed builds if the .spec file is not adapted, and it

rubygem-liquid update to 4.0.0

Hi all, I am planning to update the rubygem-liquid package (which was orphaned, and then taken by me) to the latest upstream release, 4.0.0. This will break the current (really outdated) rubygem-jekyll package, which depends on liquid < 4. I have reached out to rubygem-jekyll-owner (which should

Re: rubygem-liquid update to 4.0.0

> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> I am planning to update the rubygem-liquid package (which was orphaned, and then taken by me) to the latest upstream release, 4.0.0. >> This will break the current (really

Re: rubygem-liquid update to 4.0.0

ll.spec > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 3:29 PM Frantisek Zatloukal <fzatl...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I've tried to get updated rubygem-jekyll to fedora few months

Re: GCC 8.1.1 broken in rawhide due to annobin

On Fri, May 4, 2018, 15:46 Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:42:11PM +0200, Guido Aulisi wrote: > > It seems broken in f28 too. > > There is a temporary override so that new annobin can be built, it will be > reverted afterwards. > > These shenanigans are

Re: rubygem-liquid update to 4.0.0

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:23 AM Björn 'besser82' Esser < besse...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2018, 17:51 + schrieb Fabio Valentini: > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:45 PM Frantisek Zatloukal <fzatl...@redhat.co > > m> > > wrote: > >

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-05-24 16:00 UTC)

Sorry, I probably won't be able to participate today due to health issues. Fabio On Thu, May 24, 2018, 05:40 James Antill wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC > meeting Thursday at 2018-05-24 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on >

Valid use case for modularity or not?

Hi all, I think I finally found a scenario where building some of my (and others') packages as modules would be beneficial. The situation is: - The syncthing package has a lot of golang dependencies. - Some of them are too old in fedora, even in fedora rawhide, and some of them have not been

Re: broken package needs attention: libgda

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:39 AM Haïkel wrote: > > 2018-06-10 22:46 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto : > > On Sun, 2018-06-10 at 18:27 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The "libgda" package is quite broken in fedora, which is impacting > &g

broken package needs attention: libgda

Hi, The "libgda" package is quite broken in fedora, which is impacting dependent programs. - The last successful build of libgda was for the fedora 24 (!) mass rebuild. No more recent builds succeeded, and the packages was reported as FTBFS. - Not even the latest version is packaged (5.2.2

Re: Intent to update granite to 5.0 (includes an soname bump)

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 6:55 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > The elementary project has recently released version 5.0 of their granite > toolkit extensions library, which includes an soname bump, and some > deprecated APIs were removed. > > I intend to up

Re: [heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:29 AM Milan Crha wrote: > > Hello, > next week's 3.29.3 release of evolution-data-server (on 2018-06-18) > will contain soname version bumps of libcamel and libedata-cal. I > expect that most of the packages can be just rebuilt. > > I cannot provide the complete

Re: Valid use case for modularity or not?

On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 3:44 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 9:35 AM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think I finally found a scenario where building some of my (and > others') packag

Re: Change in Copr retention policy?

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:31 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Hi, > I would like to open discussion about Copr retention policy change. > > Right now we have: > > > How long do you keep the builds? ¶ > > > We keep the last successful build from each package indefinitely. All other > > builds (old

Re: Valid use case for modularity or not?

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:36 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:13 AM Adam Samalik wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Fabio Valentini

Intent to update granite to 5.0 (includes an soname bump)

Hi everybody, The elementary project has recently released version 5.0 of their granite toolkit extensions library, which includes an soname bump, and some deprecated APIs were removed. I intend to update the granite package in rawhide next week, and I am fairly confident that this won't cause

Re: Valid use case for modularity or not?

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:58 AM Petr Šabata <con...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 05:00:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 3:44 PM Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 9:35 AM F

Re: Valid use case for modularity or not?

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:13 AM Adam Samalik <asama...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:58 AM Petr Šabata <con...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, May

fedora infrastructure problems?

Hi everybody, Is anybody else experiencing problems with the fedora infrastructure right now? - I was barely able to build a package with koji due to src.fp.org errors - fedmsg messages seem to be delayed up to 20 minutes - I can't comment on issues on pagure.io right now - fedpkg request-repo

Re: [Proposal] Mass change: remove executing gtk-update-icon-cache in %post/%postu/%postrans to update hicolor theme cache

So, if I am reading this correctly: 1) Triggers have been added to hicolor-icon-theme in all supported fedora releases (f26+), 2) the scriptlets are no longer necessary in packages installing hicolor icons, and 3) references to the scriptlets have been removed from the packaging guidelines.

Re: EPEL support in "master" branch (aka speeding up Fedora development)

On Jan 20, 2018 12:29, "Igor Gnatenko" wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, I know that many of you like to have just one branch which builds everywhere (starting from el6), but this really slows down development of Fedora for many

Re: Re: EPEL analyse/observation, some question, PR proposals/questions and more ..

On Jan 22, 2018 11:32, wrote: - Mail original - De: "Stephen John Smoogen" > They pull in what they want to make it work and could > give a care if it is readable to anyone else. The problem is that past a certain point those become effectively

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 4:24 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > I updated redhat-rpm-config to instruct ld to reject linking shared objects > with undefined symbols. Such undefined symbols break symbol versioning > because the are not necessarily bound to the correct symbol version

Re: Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

On Jan 23, 2018 12:41, wrote: - Mail original - De: "Neal Gompa" >On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 8:33 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune > >>> I really do like this. There are only two issues I have with it: >>> >>> 1. This seems to mandate that all packages must be named by

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/25/2018 03:45 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: >> >> On 25 January 2018 at 14:28, Richard Hughes wrote: >>> >>> Was there a test mass rebuild? If so, how many packages need fixes? I >>> got bitten by

Re: Package Wishlist (Was: Working on a Dracut bug?)

On Jan 26, 2018 20:23, wrote: > Jason L Tibbitts III hat am 26. Januar 2018 um 17:54 geschrieben: > > > (Trimmed CC list) > > > "i" == inderaue23 writes: > > i> btw. do you know where i could request new packages for fedora >

Re: [HEADS UP] Removal of systemd-units

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> It's been 6 years since systemd-units package was merged to systemd, but >> package maintainers still use it. EL7 has same guidelines as Fedora, so it >> is safe to make it compliant with

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > I have reverted the -z defs change in rawhide. A substantial number of > underlinked binaries are still shipped in rawhide after this change, either > due to explicit overrides or incomplete build flags injection. This

Re: [HEADS UP] Replacing %post/%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 17/02/2018 à 10:05, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : >> On Sat, 2018-02-17 at 07:08 +0100, Remi Collet wrote: >>> Le 16/02/2018 à 15:18, Mark Wielaard a écrit : >> I had to tweak it a little though so the spec could

Re: RFC: BugURL in packages

On Feb 15, 2018 11:52, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" wrote: On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:22:27AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hello, > > it's been just 9 years since BugURL has been added to RPM, but it has not been > used. > > I

Re: RFC: BugURL in packages

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 6:03 AM, Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Feb 15, 2018 11:52, "Pierre-Yves Chibon" <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:56:23AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu <mbo...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> >

Re: Dynamically-generated C stored in SVN is breaking our distribution because life is awful (was Re: F28 System Wide Change: GCC8)

On Feb 20, 2018 08:54, "Adam Williamson" wrote: On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 22:57 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 21:51 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:50:10PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Well, true, but then just

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018, 16:39 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at

Re: Fedora 28 Mass Branching

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:35 AM, Mohan Boddu wrote: > Hi All, > > Fedora 28 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull > --rebase to pick up the new branch, One of my packages (syncthing) didn't get the new "f28" branch, is there a reason why? (It's not retired in

unannounced soname bump: gnome-desktop3 / libgnome-desktop-3

FYI, the .so version of libgnome-desktop-3 was bumped from 12 to 17 with the build of gnome-desktop3-3.27.90-1.fc28 without previous announcement. Packages that will have to be rebuilt - if it hasn't happened already (I didn't check individual changelogs, so no guarantee for correctness or

Re: to batch or not to batch?

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 11:15 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Bodhi currently provides "batched updates" [1] which lump updates of > packages that are not marked urgent into a single batch, released once > per week. This means that after an update has graduated from

Re: Golang SIG for Fedora

Count me in for the SIG too, since I maintain ~40 golang packages. Are there plans to create a golang-sig group too, so that group can be granted access to golang src.fd.org repositories (like the one that exists for ruby, for example)? Fabio (decathorpe) On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 5:27 PM Athos

Re: fedora-review — do we have a maintainer?

On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:34 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > f-r currently fails to build (#1603956), it has a bunch of bugs open [1] > and many issues and unhandled pull requests in the upstream repo [2, 3]. > The last upstream commit was 2 years ago. > > f-r has is annoyingly

Re: Automating Package Review (Was: fedora-review -- do we have a maintainer?)

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 20:53 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > While I agree that this is a good idea, I have one note of caution: > What's to stop someone adding a malicious package which did something > like ‘Provides: glibc’ and subsequently infects everyone's machine? > I think we'd want to

Re: Idea: let's use Pagure to track Changes

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 11:38 David Sommerseth wrote: > On 23/08/18 22:43, Ben Cotton wrote: > > Hi community, > > > > We've traditionally used the wiki for Change proposals because it's > > the tool we had. But, it's not necessarily well-suited to the purpose. > > But now we have Pagure, which

Re: Fedora 29 Beta Freeze

On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:57 PM Mohan Boddu wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today's an important day on the Fedora 29 schedule[1], with several > significant cut-offs. First of all today is > the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora 29 > packages must be submitted to >

Re: experiencing dnf Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' or ''updates'

On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:27 AM Michal Novotny wrote: > > Hello, > > I am occasionally experiencing the following error in my day-to-day dnf use: > > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'fedora' > > or > > Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates' > > I've had that happened even in

Re: Again, please announce your so-name bumps!

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 17:48 Rex Dieter wrote: > Christian Dersch wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > please announce your so-name bumps *before* you push them. This time > > LibRaw bumped its version > > I added explicit soname tracking there so hopefully it won't happen again > (at least not by

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libconfig

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:06 PM Rex Dieter wrote: > > Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > This build: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1130189 > > > > changed the soname from libconfig.so.9 to libconfig.so.11 thus > > breaking a number of packages. > > Hopefully

Re: Fedora testing-20180723.0 compose check report

What's this email about? No release number, no other information ... is this still the stray report that's being generated somewhere because of a bug? Fabio On Mon, Jul 23, 2018, 05:46 Fedora compose checker < rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Passed openQA

Re: Self introduction: Eduardo Otubo

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018, 15:24 Cole Robinson wrote: > Welcome Eduardo :) > > On 07/19/2018 06:47 AM, Eduardo Otubo wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > My name is Eduardo and I'll be helping co-maintaining the cloud-init > package for Fedora. > > > > I've been working with QEMU/KVM since 2011. In 2013 I

Re: Errors in compiling darktable subpackages

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 9:28 PM Germano Massullo wrote: > > I am working on adding more features to darktable (basecurve tool and noise > tool subpackages). > > In log [1] from line > > BUILDSTDERR: /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFiles/dt-curve-tool.dir/dt-curve-tool.c.o: > relocation R_X86_64_32S against

Call for Help: gala + Pantheon DE on fedora 29+

Hi everybody, I am faced with a problem that's due to the update of mutter / GNOME to version 3.30: The gala window manager - which is used by the Pantheon DE (primary DE of elementaryOS) - is broken by the API bump from libmutter-2 to libmutter-3. I reported this "issue" with the fedora mutter

Re: Self introduction: Alain Vigne

On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 8:23 AM Alain Vigne wrote: > > Hello ? No one interested ? > How do I move forward ? Hello! Welcome to fedora, and sorry for the silence from the mailing list - time before beta releases is usually quite busy. I assume you have already read the wiki page on how to join

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 7:44 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > > OK, builds done and the 3.30.0 megaupdate is in Bodhi now and queued for > updates-testing: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-85d637c544 > > -- > Kalev Are gjs 3.30 and mozjs60 missing from the megaupdate on purpose, or

Re: EPEL support in "master" branch (aka speeding up Fedora development)

On Jan 24, 2018 08:55, "Miroslav Suchý" wrote: Dne 20.1.2018 v 12:27 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > Why I'm writing this? I want to hear from you if you think it would be good to > prohibit (or advise, or whatever mechanism would work) usage if conditionals in > (at least) master

Spring cleaning my golang packages (orphaning now unused stuff)

Hi everybody, I'm going to orphan some of my golang packages that were initially pulled in by syncthing as dependencies, but have been dropped as dependencies again (... don't ask. golang people produce dependencies like rabbits make bunnies.). Most of them are fairly low maintenance packages,

Re: Spring cleaning my golang packages (orphaning now unused stuff)

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Jan Chaloupka <jchal...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Fabio, > > > On 03/07/2018 08:29 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I'm going to orphan some of my golang packages that were initially pulled in > by syncthing as de

Re: Spring cleaning my golang packages (orphaning now unused stuff)

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Hi, > > Some of those will be recreated when I submit my specs for integration > and review but I'd rather finish stabilising the macros before I submit > something that needs changing (some of my specs use

Re: GNOME 3.28.0 megaupdate

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm wrangling the GNOME 3.28.0 builds in Fedora and the plan is to > submit a single megaupdate with all of 3.28.0 builds into Bodhi. If > you're helping with builds, please use 'fedpkg build --target

Re: Broken rawhide buildroot/tools?

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018, 10:00 Jan Synacek wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to update pidgin, but the package doesn't build and it > doesn't seem to be a packaging problem to me [1]. What's happening? > > [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25678436 It looks

Re: Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le jeudi 08 mars 2018 à 18:15 +0200, Yanko Kaneti a écrit : >> >> Nobody would care if a MTA on the way Fedora-ml->your-mailbox adds >> because nobody but you would see it. > > And what, exactly, do you think

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:06 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018, 18:28 Matthew Miller, wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:03:24PM +, James Hogarth wrote: >> > > I'm imagining all those dependent packages _also_ moving to

Re: How should I coordinate the package updates with you guys?

I suggest you look at the wiki page describing the package update process, specifically the section for rawhide: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master It outlines the actions recommended / needed for updates with and without implications for dependent

Re: orphaning my Ruby and Perl packages

On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 2:18 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > Hi folks, > > I had several Ruby and Perl packages in Fedora that I no longer > maintain any more. > > I've assigned all these to the "orphan" ID in src.fedoraproject.org . > > perl-Nagios-Plugin-WWW-Mechanize >

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 12:53 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > Good morning! > Based on the outcome of this discussion, I started trying to draw how the > process to update a package in rawhide would look like with rawhide being > gated > on tests. > >

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 14:51 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 11:16:35AM +0000, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 12:53 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> > >wrote: > > Based on the outc

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 15:47 Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 01:39:34PM +0000, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >One example where running tests against a single-package update would > be > >nice IMO would be for toolchain and ba

What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

Hi, I've got two updates sitting in F26 and F27 updates-testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c455a245b0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4d0e13ff51 I can't push either of them to batched or stable (despite them being in -testing for over 10 days now),

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Michael Cronenworth <m...@cchtml.com> wrote: > On 03/18/2018 01:02 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> I've looked at waiverdb-cli too, but since no tests seem to have run >> at all, it looks like the wrong tool for the job: >> I don

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 6:28 PM, Michael Cronenworth <m...@cchtml.com> wrote: > On 03/18/2018 05:03 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> I've got two updates sitting in F26 and F27 updates-testing: >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c455a245b0 &g

Re: Goodbye nvr.rsplit('-', 2), hello modularity

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018, 10:20 Petr Šabata wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 08:57:08AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 09:27:30AM +0100, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 07:09:23PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote:

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:57:19PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> waiverdb-cli should now support waiving missing results, I'm double-checking >> it >> and see if we can document it at: >>

Re: Announcing DNF 3 development

On Thu, Mar 22, 2018, 23:13 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:49 PM, John Reiser wrote: > > On 03/22/2018 01:51 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:52 AM, John Reiser > >> wrote: >

Re: Patching JSON tag without hardcoding library path (package firefox-pkcs11-loader)

On Mar 4, 2018 16:59, "Rex Dieter" wrote: Germano Massullo wrote: > Package > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox-pkcs11-loader > (upstream) https://github.com/open-eid/firefox-pkcs11-loader > > contains file > https://github.com/open-eid/firefox-pkcs11-loader/blob/

Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

Hi everybody, I've been following the (long overdue) improvements concerning go packaging in fedora, and since I saw that packages are starting to make use of the new mechanisms, I wanted to finally check it out and started "converting" one of my own (one of ~50) golang packages

Re: Unannounced soname bump (Rawhide): qpdf (libqpdf.so.18 -> libqpdf.so.21)

On Feb 28, 2018 12:35, "Ralf Corsepius" wrote: On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 28.2.2018 v 12:14 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > >> On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson >>>

PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide

Just a heads-up for anyone experiencing build failures like me. Recently the forge macros were ported to use distprefix on f30. An unrelated change followed and a new build was pushed to rawhide (maybe without realising that it would also push the forge macro changes). This change was introduced

Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide

On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 6:14 PM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le dimanche 14 octobre 2018 à 15:37 +0200, Fabio Valentini a écrit : > > > > It looks like the forge macros weren't tested to be backwards > > compatible, because packages that build successfully now fail to b

Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide

On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 7:21 PM Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le dimanche 14 octobre 2018 à 18:56 +0200, Fabio Valentini a écrit : > > > > You know that GitHub has supported the same thing for a long time? > > The URL " > > https://github.com/project/repo/archive/$

Intent to orphan / give to go-sig some unused leaf golang packages

Hi everybody, I'm cleaning up my packages a bit, and I currently maintain some leaf packages which aren't used by anything (or anything I use) at this point in time. The packages all have the go-sig as co-admin already, but I intend to drop them from my radar completely. You know, cognitive

Re: Fedora 29 compose report: 20181017.n.0 changes

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02 PM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 06:50:51PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > I'm confused by this podman build. Especially so with my Packaging > > Committee hat on. > > > > - changelog message

Re: Intent to orphan / give to go-sig some unused leaf golang packages

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I'm cleaning up my packages a bit, and I currently maintain some leaf > packages which aren't used by anything (or anything I use) at this > point in time. > > The packages all have the go-sig as

Re: Fedora 29 compose report: 20181017.n.0 changes

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:20 PM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:02:27PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02 PM Lokesh Mandvekar > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 06:50:51PM +020

Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018, 10:58 Jakub Cajka wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Nicolas Mailhot" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > Cc: "Fabio Valentini" > > Sent:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >