/pkgs/
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
TeXmacs
trackballs
xbindkeys
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/23/2012 11:15 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/23/2012 08:51 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
I've created a review request for compat-guile1.8:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868263
Once the compat package lands in rawhide, I will leave some time for the
transition (I may
start
porting as well.
Huh, I hope my point is clearly visible in my slightly complicated message..
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/23/2012 12:52 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 10/23/2012 12:12 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
This is what I had originally in mind. After trying to realize this idea and
consulting it with the maintainer (I'm a comaintainer of guile), it didn't
seem
right. The problem is that a lot of things have
and to file bugs without mercy;)
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/23/2013 04:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:58:09 -0500 (EST)
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Features/Guile2 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Guile2
Feature owner(s): Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com
Update GNU Guile to version 2.0.x in Fedora
On 01/23/2013 10:23 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Features/Guile2 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Guile2
Feature owner(s): Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com
Update GNU Guile to version 2.0.x in Fedora 19.
== Detailed description
do not want to be the owner of the package. Is anybody willing grab pidgin?
- --
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS1O9YAAoJEL3BmMJQOtjBLXIP/ihrbTC
be) if there are any
unmatched entries.
You can run logwatch like so:
logwatch --range all --service all
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=317339
Thank you!
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/04/12 at 09:38am, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello list,
I'm looking for as many logwatch runs in Fedora 16 as possible. I need to
test
the F17 package so I know if there are any problems with compatibility.
Typo?, or you want to run the F17 pkg
On 05/04/12 at 01:01pm, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 04/05/12 12:54, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2012 13:48, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On 04/05/12 09:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
should last 24hrs
http://fpaste.org/yH9I/
http://fpaste.org/aOLp/
http://fpaste.org/Lpbn/
http://fpaste.org/c9FR
On 05/05/12 at 08:46pm, Richard Vickery wrote:
- Selinux Audit Begin
**Unmatched Entries**
snip
Thank you, Richard!
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
sure.
The problem goes away when I add sleep 1 between autoreconf and %configure in
the spec file.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
the trick. You will probably have to
yum groupinstall X Window System
as well as some drivers for your graphic card to get it working.
I also had to order selinux to relabel my entire /home to be able to get into
any gnome session.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
On 07/10/2012 03:46 AM, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
snip
Just about. co-maintainers welcome.
Regards,
Stu.
I will be happy to help.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
Hello all,
what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream and no
upstream source?
I mean the URL and Source0 lines. Should I just let them there, put a note in a
comment or
just remove them?
I haven't found anything about such case in the guidelines.
Thanks,
--
Jan
On 07/18/2012 10:43 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 10:19 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello all,
what should I do with the spec file of a package (ftp) with no upstream and
no upstream source?
I mean the URL and Source0 lines. Should I just let them there, put a note
packages can be affected?
[1] ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/Networking/netkit
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/19/2012 09:42 AM, Paul Black wrote:
On 19 July 2012 06:15, Jan Synacek mailto:jsyna...@redhat.comwrote:
On 07/18/2012 04:15 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Did the netkit upstream finally give up the ghost entirely? If so, it
likely
affects more packages than just ftp
way would be
some kind of a compatibility layer in guile itself, but I don't think that's
worth the trouble and the net gain for the upstream.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
. The package requires %{_sbindir}/ldconfig, which is
fine AFAIK.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, BaseOS team Brno, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
misleading, because the 'sources' file gets staged
automatically after new-sources, so if you do fedpkg commit, it gets commited
anyway.
Hope this explanation is not even more confusing:)
Best regards,
--
Jan Synacek
BaseOS team Brno
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Regards,
--
Jan Synacek
BaseOS team Brno
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2 -
libldap-2.4.so.2.9.0
Rich.
Have you found out how this originally happened? I can't get any of my f18-f20
machines to this state.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
?id=159601
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
it. If that or anything similar happened in your case, I wouldn't be surprised
that your shell is waiting for some timeouts while doing authentication that you
might not know about. Again, that's just a wild guess.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
], but that will probably not happen as it would require a total
rewrite. It would make more sense to write a new logwatch-like utility from
scratch, that handles only the journal. It's somewhere on my todo list, but has
quite a low priority:(
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864872
--
Jan Synacek
escapes me, though. How do I fix this
mess?
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 08/21/2013 01:41 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hi,
I just updated my rawhide machine and it stopped booting. I end up in grub
rescue prompt, stating that there is no '/grub2/i386-pc/normal.mod'.
grub rescue ls /grub2
./ ../ themes/ grub.cfg
grub rescue set
prefix=(hd0,msdos1)/grub2
root
? I couldn't find any other upstream sources.
jsynacek:BADURL:xinetd-2.3.15.tar.gz:xinetd
Fixed.
- --
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/14/2014 10:03 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
On 11/18/2013 04:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
jsynacek:BADURL:xferstats-2.16.tar.gz:xferstats
xferstats.off.net seems to be down. I'll try to contact the author who is
mentioned in the manpage. In case I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058220
Cheers,
- --
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058220
Cheers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/12/2014 12:47 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi Jan,
On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 13:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying to contact Stu Tomlinson for a while now -- in a
bugzilla [1] and by mail. Anybody know how to contact him?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058220
Cheers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2014 01:57 PM, Stu Tomlinson wrote:
Jan,
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2014 01:32 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:
Hello,
I've been trying
it
needs to be fixed.
Rich.
Thanks for the report. Let's continue in the bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028557
Cheers,
- --
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird
. If there are any openldap users, please,
comment.
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
with gcc-4.9.2-5.fc22.x86_64 to quickly remove from
the list packages that fail for non-GCC related reasons.
...
openldap-2.4.40-5.fc22.src.rpm
Fixed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191098
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel
reminiscent of [1]. Any chance that the process that
actually uses the cpu is dbus related?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186018
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-2.10.11-2.fc21
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:52:09 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
I'm trying to give one of my packages (openldap) to another developer,
but the online tool keeps saying that User is not in the packager
group, which I believe is not true, because he
I'm trying to give one of my packages (openldap) to another developer,
but the online tool keeps saying that User is not in the packager
group, which I believe is not true, because he is in the same Fedora
groups as I am. Where can I report this?
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
) and system package management such as we
have had to solve for perl, python, texlive etc etc. But it's not
clear to me what a good solution would be for Emacs. I'd welcome any
thoughts anyone has (especially Tom Tromey if he still reads this
list).
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com writes:
On 24 June 2015 at 08:01, Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com wrote:
Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com writes:
So, I am not really sure what a good way forward is at this point.
Certainly package.el could be extended to help us
I'm getting this error:
bash: /usr/bin/rpmbuild: No such file or directory
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11804093
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Jan Synacek <jsyna...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> I'm getting this error:
>>>
>>&
I can't 'fedpkg build' right now and I'm not sure where to file this.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
t suddenly require emacs-filesystem to be
installed as a dependency.
Any comments? Maybe there are still people that were involved with the
change?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661866
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatur
is then
simply consitent with the rest of the icons. The emacsclient behavior is
just weird.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175969
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:35:51 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> long time ago, there was a request to create the emacs-filesystem
>> package [1], so other packages could drop their emacs-specific f
Haïkel <hgue...@fedoraproject.org> writes:
> 2016-01-07 9:07 GMT+01:00 Jan Synacek <jsyna...@redhat.com>:
>> Hello Emacs fans,
>>
>> in case you want to try the latest Emacs and don't want to build it
>> yourselves...
>>
>> https://copr.fedora
Jonathan Underwood <jonathan.underw...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 4 January 2016 at 14:35, Jan Synacek <jsyna...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> Any comments? Maybe there are still people that were involved with the
>> change?
>
> Those unaware of history are
t.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280245, the attached
patch should answer your question.
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
problem, which is really sad. What is even more sad is the line
that has been added into the changelog. It says "Rebuilt for ",
which is simply not true.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> writes:
> ...
> purple-plugin_pack -- A set of plugins for libpurple, pidgin, and finch (
> master f23 f22 )
Taken.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
-libs-3.5.1-7.fc24.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package python3-libs-3.4.3-5.fc23.x86_64
file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstopus.so from install of
gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.7.90-2.fc24.x86_64 conflicts with file from
package gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.6.3-3.fc23.x86_64
--
Jan Synacek
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46 PM, José Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:13:47 PM WET Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Currently, it's not possible to update from F23 to F24 because of
>> broken dependencies.
>>
>> # dnf update --releasever=
used or never heard of someone using.
>
> Do the pidgin maintainers want to take the package on, or recompile
> pidgin without silc support so we can get pidgin of the death list?
I've disabled silc support.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Jonathan Wakely
<jwak...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On 11/07/16 13:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:09:24PM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm tryin
understands g++ please advise how to fix this? I
don't quite understand why it doesn't work.
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
aintaining Rust
packages for Fedora."
Isn't packaging Rust libraries waste of time? Cargo does a great job
taking care of the libraries / dependencies.
How is packaging Rust applications different from packaging any
compiled (to ELF) applications? Apart from having the correct runtime,
of course.
C
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 09:15:46AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> warzone2100 fails to build [1] and I have no idea how to fix that.
>> Most of the errors are:
>>
>> ma
me in the right direction? I've looked at [2], but
that doesn't seem to help much in this case.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1254868
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/porting_to.html
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
lain mock -n (and/or --no-cleanup-after).
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Why were critpath flags set on Emacs and Guile?
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Miller
<mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:39:30AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> > Bug 1469712 - font antialiasing/hinting is not working on Fedora 26
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_b
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tomasz Torcz <to...@pipebreaker.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:25:41AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> something changed between F24 and F26 (even F25) regarding font
>> rendering and I can't figure out what
change any settings. I didn't upgrade, but reinstalled
F26. I would like to fix this because it's killing my eyes. Any idea
what has changed or what to install/remove/reconfigure to bring the
old rendering back?
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
.
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20592574
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
files under common directory,
>e.g. /usr/share/doc/git/
> ignoring the sub-package that install specific doc files.
Yes, please. Since versioned docs are not used anymore, this is makes
perfect sense, at least to me.
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
_
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 09:57:50AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko
>> <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> > snip
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko
<ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> snip
I kind of wonder... What is so special about them that they deserve a
big announcement like this?
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
d.X .depend
/bin/sh: cc: command not found
I consider that a broken buildroot.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I was trying to update pidgin, but the package doesn't build and it
doesn't seem to be a packaging problem to me [1]. What's happening?
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25678436
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Emmanuel Seyman <emman...@seyman.fr> wrote:
> * Jan Synacek [13/03/2018 09:59] :
>>
>> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25678436
>
> From the root.log:
>
> DEBUG util.py:439: No matching package to insta
Did I miss something? The xinetd package cannot be built because of that.
Cheers,
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:30:32 +0100
> Jan Synacek <jsyna...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Did I miss something? The xinetd package cannot be built because of
>> that.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/
together, because they are similar, or simply to "also see" something that
might be related, can hardly be called external tracking.
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
lled
DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: - conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides
libwmflite-0.2.so.7()(64bit) needed by
ImageMagick-libs-1:6.9.10.23-1.fc30.x86_64
Looks like a broken ImageMagick to me.
--
Jan Synacek
Software
ntifier? There seems to be something wrong
with the basic systemtap installation. I do have matching debuginfo for
both kernel and systemd installed. Running stap-prep only wants to install
kernel-debuginfo.
How do I make this basic use-case work?
Regards,
--
Jan Synacek
Softwa
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:37 PM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> CC systemtap upstream list, because I think this is not a great error
> message.
>
> On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 09:53 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> > I'm trying to run systemtap on F29 and I'm getting
ild (f31-candidate,
> /rpms/cppad.git:82bd2cc17cc49f57aec7aabf1d0aeff9e664): open
> (buildvm-05.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: GenericError: cannot
> update build 1425936, state:
> COMPLETE
>0 free 0 open 7 done 1 failed
>
> 40063178 build (f31-candidate,
&g
/xinetd
--
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code
85 matches
Mail list logo
