On 08/25/2013 01:17 AM, Till Maas wrote:
It seems that the following packages are stil mentioned in f20 or
f21 comps (I do not know which I checked) but are not in the i686 repo.
At least some of these packages are arch specific:
ant-scripts
ant-scripts fixed.
Thanks,
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
] No more mirrors to try.
[...]
yum clean all does not help. How can I get it working again?
You can try:
# rm -rf /var/cache/mock
This usually helps me in such cases.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
)
This is a bug in bouncycastle -- it does not follow Java packaging
guidelines in terms of versioned JARs and compatibility packages.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
.
[1] /usr/share/doc/setup/uidgid
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
want to rebuild and reinstall rpm package
for now on.
Dynamic assignment is done by adduser tool. adduser -r will create user
with UID 999 if available, if not then 998 and so on. Basically adduser
-r chooses UIDs from SYS_UID_MIN to SYS_UID_MAX, as defined in
/etc/login.defs
--
Mikolaj
be possible to keep maintaining the old (free) version I
think it's much better for us to migrate to different JSON libraries.
Packaging old unmaintained libraries like this one while there are many
alternatives is against one of Fedora goals -- innovation.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel
-0.25.a2.fc20
1.0-0.a2.24.fc20.1 1.0-0.25.a2.fc20
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
then packaging Knopflerfish itself won't solve the problem.
[1]
https://knopflerfish.org/svn/knopflerfish.org/trunk/osgi/ee/ee.minimum.jar
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
PS. For Java-related topics you can post to java-devel instead.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
On 11/11/2013 11:07 AM, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 11/11/2013 10:53, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
On 11/09/2013 03:25 PM, Manuel Faux wrote:
I found Knopflerfish, which is a OSGi 5 platform licensed under BSD
license, which would be compatible to Fedora
(http://www.knopflerfish.org
tycho
wildfly
xbean
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
W dniu 25.11.2013 18:16, Pavel Alexeev pisze:
How groovy will be in Fedora? Is it mean it also will be retired soon?
No, there are no plans of retiring groovy. (Groovy can be either with
Ant or Gradle. Fedora uses the first option.)
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
advice how to fix the problem.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
).
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-engine-notification-service-3.1.0-1.fc19.noarch requires
classpathx-mail
Leaf package. This is a known issue (bug #914235), No response from
maintainer.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
://yajsw.sourceforge.net/ instead.
java-service-wrapper is still used by other package. It's in dependency
chain of JBoss AS. I can take the ownership.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
). This way members of Java SIG can easily see
that there is a new review and take care of it.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
]
strange which xerces-j2 version is available in rawhide, is the same in
f19?
That FTBFS was probably caused by a bug [1] in ant, which should be
fixed now, so now the build succeeds.
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=994556
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC
and it was recently
removed. See my announcements on java-devel [1,2].
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2013-July/004834.html
[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2013-July/004863.html
--
devel mailing list
devel
JFlex (The Fast Scanner Generator for Java) changed its license from
GPL+ to BSD, starting with upstream version 1.5.0.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
jflex maintainer
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
://jenkins.cloud.fedoraproject.org/job/xmvn/ws/RPM/latest
cost=3000
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
in consecutive builds.
One way to achieve this is:
RELEASE=$(git describe --match=[^(jenkins)].* --tags | sed
's/[^-]*-/0./;s/-/./;s/g/git/')
sed -i s/^Release:\s\+[0-9.]*%{?dist}$/Release: ${RELEASE}/ *.spec
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
that the above dependency situation can be improved
without removing legitimate Requires or patching upstream code.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
On 01/30/2014 01:56 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 30 January 2014 12:48, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
Some
dependencies may be required only in some contexts, for example only for
testing, or only when using that package to compile other packages.
I think not-installed
--build setup-0-0 echo $?
pkill -SIGINT koji
exit code from koji is 0
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
branches when possible.
In particular merging mass rebuild commits is OK.
In case FF merge is impossible I agree with the procedure you described.
You need to increase release tag in a way that assures upgrade path and
one way to do that is adding .1 after dist tag.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC
were fast-forwarding commits from f21 to f20 and at some
point you need to add a bugfix only for f20. Adding .1 after dist-tag
will work in this case.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
because that's
what we do in Java world.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
that, there is already one approved change [1] which requires
rebuilding most of Java packages. We didn't do a mass rebuild for it
yet because we wanted to sync with Java 8 rebuild.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HeadlessJava
--
devel mailing list
devel
On 03/24/2014 04:49 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says 80% build
failure rate without saying that all are JavaDoc
On 03/25/2014 06:45 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
* Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com [2014-03-24 11:41]:
On 03/22/2014 06:15 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Given the known large number of failures (OptionalJavadocs says 80% build
failure rate without saying that all are JavaDoc-related), we really
On 03/25/2014 08:07 PM, Omair Majid wrote:
* Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com [2014-03-24 11:55]:
Blocking java-1.7.0-oepnjdk may also be required. This
makes it impossible to scratch-build Java packages using f21-build
target in current state.
Is there anything I can
in Java 7. That's the
reason tools like animal-sniffer were created.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 04/02/2014 08:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Proposed System Wide Change: lbzip2 as default bzip2 implementation =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/lbzip2
Change owner(s): Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
This change aims at making
created with pbzip2 cannot be decompressed by some
software, such as libbzip2 (all versions), bzip2 older than version
0.9.0, Apache Commons Compress.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
) pointing to
lbzip2 binary and at the same time applications can keep using libbz2.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
and add is a dependency of
@buildsys-build to effectively make it default implementation.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
do this.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
complicate problem reporting, reproduction, analysis and
correction.
lbzip2 does not (at least not yet) provide interfaces of libbz2 library,
only command line tools. This Change does *not* affect users of libbz2.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com said:
lbzip2 does not (at least not yet) provide interfaces of libbz2 library,
only command line tools. This Change does *not* affect users of libbz2
with direct
invocation of the command (from the command prompt, a shell script, or
system() type call).
That's true. And even in the unlikely case that something goes wrong,
developers (or even users themselves) have possibility to easily switch
back to bzip2.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
--
devel mailing
of rpm package
payloads. Since Fedora uses LZMA compression, libbz2 is used only when
installing some older third-party packages which happen to be compressed
with bzip2.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
this interface available somewhere? Will
packages be able to provide plugins, like for example they can install
RPM macros now?
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
As I promised, I prepared a benchmark of lbzip2 and bzip2.
I also added pbzip2 for comparison.
Basic information
=
Test date: 2014-04-04
Tester:Mikolaj Izdebski
Test subjects: lbzip2 2.5
bzip2 1.0.6
pbzip2 1.1.6
Test purpose: compare
/command/.
I have clarified that in the change proposal by explicitly stating that
this change replaces bzip2 tool only and that libbzip2 is not affected.
http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/lbzip2diff=375469oldid=375468
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
On 04/04/2014 05:16 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 04/04/2014 04:15 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Compression of payload.tar
--
command| real | user | sys | memory | compr. size
---+++--++
lbzip2 | 3.36
On 04/04/2014 05:26 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 04/04/2014 05:16 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 04/04/2014 04:15 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
Compression of payload.tar
--
command| real | user | sys | memory | compr. size
On 04/04/2014 07:01 PM, Susi Lehtola wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 12:49:25 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 04:15:59PM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
lbzip2 -u always produced smallest files (even smaller than bzip2)
while consuming the least amount
to fix.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Ok the patch worked fine for building on my F20, which I did as a test,
however it failed the build in rawhide.
The only clue I can get is this:
configure: WARNING: unable to include jni.h
What's in the configure log file regarding this?
This is solved now, AFAIK. The configure
://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mash.git/tree/\
No, Java is exempt from multilib, see:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/961
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
multilib for several reasons. Because of
that Java has been granted an multibib exemption by FESCo [1]. 32-bit
JVMs not appearing in 64-bit repos is an expected thing.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/961
--
devel mailing
-retry
spring-ldap
spymemcached
thrift
tomcat
uima-addons
velocity
wise
woden
ws-jaxme
xbean
xml-security
zanata-client
zookeeper
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On 05/05/2014 02:11 PM, punto...@libero.it wrote:
Il 05/05/2014 13:41, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
Next week I am going to update log4j in rawhide from version 1.2 to
version 2.0-rc1 [2].
2.0 ships with a module providing limited 1.2 compatibility.
For more info see [1].
List of 105
will mention the recommended
replacements in the public API.
This does not affect features like the support for pointer arithmetic
and arbitrary memory access, at least not until they are removed upstream.
Comments?
IMO go ahead, but please add them to some tracking bug.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
.
If they do then it's unintended. Can you report it with more details?
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
On 05/16/2014 09:10 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 05/16/2014 07:16 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 05/15/2014 06:30 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 05/15/2014 06:14 PM, Michael Simacek wrote:
I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
The packages that are known to be broken by this update are:
Have
here:
https://github.com/ctubbsii/accumulo-fedora (temporary)
I had a quick look at the package and it looks good. There are some
things that could be improved, but it's more a matter of style and best
practices rather than correctness.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
/198934.html
[2]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2013-October/005000.html
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091042
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On 05/26/2014 05:11 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
* Maven-related:
6879292 bookkeeper
6879822 zookeeper
These look like missing BuildRequires on 'mvn(org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12)'
aka slf4j-log4j12.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel
, not a defect in
javapackages-tools code. I'll make sure that this is cleared up ASAP.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
://jenkins.cloud.fedoraproject.org/job/mock/ws/RPMS/
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 06/09/2014 09:03 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote:
Another source of Java build failures may be that the
javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven
dep fragments should live; see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id
On 06/20/2014 02:11 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Hi,
just a short question: Is http://copr.fedoraproject.org/ down?
Yes it is - planned outage.
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4416
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel
was commited and it should be fixed soon.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-of-Mon-20140324/thread.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mizdebsk/HowToSubmitPatches
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
On 06/27/2014 09:39 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2014-06-27 07:09, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 06/26/2014 08:01 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
As a newcomer to Fedora development, is there something else I should
doing to get these patches reviewed and committed?
I offered you on IRC applying
need
a releng ticket.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
to have. Most of Java libraries
keep installing them in F21+ and there are no plans of dropping them.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct
) and added pmackinn as
comaintainer.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
on finding and fixing bugs in
individual packages.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 09/23/2014 05:08 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
On 09/23/2014 10:49 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
For log4j12, I don't see any problem. Can you provide more details?
A bug was fixed in log4j12 that moved the jar from _jnidir to _javadir,
thus breaking the symlinks in packages built before
I took plotutils by mistake a few months ago as part of large package
reassignment. I am orphaning it now as I never intended to maintain the
package. Feel free to adopt it if you wish.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
out it would be
easier to reimplement the same functionality in clean room than
convincing upstream to relicense.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
be deferred until
the following meeting.
I've just filled a ticket (#471: Bootstrap exception for Gradle) and I
would appreciate if you could add it to the meeting agenda.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
, creating patch if necessary and sending it
upstream. If it is impractical to port to latest version then creating
compat package is acceptable as alternative solution. Current Java
packaging state it very easy (maybe even too easy) to create such compat
packages.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Java SIG
patience :)
I've taken the review and I will sponsor you.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
jruby
weli maven-eclipse-plugin
willb
akka,fmpp,sbt,scala-stm,scalacheck,spark,test-interface,typesafe-config
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On 02/03/2015 07:18 PM, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
Next week after branching I will update XMvn in rawhide (F23) to new
upstream version. Among other things, this version removes support
for legacy depmap files, which were
know why 0.9.38-3 was built, it looks like unnecessary build.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 01/19/2015 06:01 AM, gil wrote:
Il 19/01/2015 05:52, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
On 01/17/2015 12:29 PM, gil wrote:
Hi
I want to report this problem, I do not know if they're already aware
sorry for the noise ...
Fixed in javapackages-tools-4.3.2-3 (rhbz#1183407)
Thanks!
I'll try
On 01/17/2015 12:29 PM, gil wrote:
Hi
I want to report this problem, I do not know if they're already aware
sorry for the noise ...
Fixed in javapackages-tools-4.3.2-3 (rhbz#1183407)
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel
License of JUnit was changed from CPL to EPL starting with version 4.12
https://github.com/junit-team/junit/commit/3171c4b2
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
after trying
to save.
If you add new external links then you need to solve simple equation
like 3+5=?. From time to time I forget about that and then I'm wondering
wondering why wiki is not saving my change :)
Anyways, I can add it to the list if you can't.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer
License of httpcomponents-client was changed from ASL 2.0 to
ASL 2.0 and MPL, starting with version 4.4.
This is because httpclient 4.4 includes public suffix list from
Mozilla: https://publicsuffix.org/list/effective_tld_names.dat
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
On 01/19/2015 10:29 AM, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 10:19 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
License of httpcomponents-client was changed from ASL 2.0 to ASL
2.0 and MPL, starting with version 4.4.
This is because httpclient 4.4 includes public suffix list from
Mozilla: https
] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Java#Package_Wishlist
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
/
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 01/27/2015 06:48 AM, Christopher wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Christopher ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 01/26/2015 11:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
Does anybody know if AutoService (
https
artifact is packaged or not is using repoquery:
repoquery -f 'mvn(com.google.auto.service:auto-service)'
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
and friends in minimal
buildroot, but nowdays we have packages written in dozen of different
programming languages, which don't use GCC for compilation. It makes
perfect sense to drop C-related build tools from Koji @bulid group.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
build dependencies of most of
packages? Altering them just to add gcc, make etc.
There is no progress without change.
Maybe also remove libc from minimal build root?
libc is not directly listed in @build. Among other things, it is
dependency of rpm, which will stay there.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
. This is quite new change in mock and I didn't know about it
because I don't use default configs.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
package
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 02/24/2015 01:34 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:43 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
[...]
option one - introducing new packages - preferred
1. main jdk is proclaimed as dead as it was until now. The new jdk is
derived
as new package prviousName-legacy
On 02/24/2015 04:06 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com [2015-02-24 09:58]:
On 02/24/2015 03:32 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net [2015-02-24
09:29]:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
* Dominik
in pkgdb.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
1 - 100 of 382 matches
Mail list logo
