Trying to help packaging dmtcp. There are 2 shared libs installed. They are
stripped by the rpm install, and then fail when attempting to dlopen them (or 1
of them).
1. Is that normal behaviour?
2. How can I avoid it?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to help packaging dmtcp. There are 2 shared libs installed. They are
stripped by the rpm install, and then fail when attempting to dlopen them (or
1 of them).
Fail how? What's the error?
1
Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com wrote:
It isn't strip. If I run strip on the version of libmtcp.so left in
the build dir and copy it over /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libmtcp.so, then it
also works. But that version is different from the one
Thomas Spura wrote:
Hi list,
I just build ipython-0.11 in rawhide, which changed pretty much
anything internally, so *ALL* dependant packages will be possible
broken.
repoquery just reports 2 packages, but it should be more...:
python-networkx
python-polybori
Missing packages (maybe
Here's what I got trying to use retrace server for crash of inkscape:
Retrace job failed
Analyzing crash data OK
Initializing virtual root OK
Generating backtrace Error
Unable to chmod the executable
(exited with 1)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
trying to retrace? AFAIK there seems to be a
problem with gnome-related packages.
Thanks a lot.
Michal
On 09.08.2011 19:40, Neal Becker wrote:
Here's what I got trying to use retrace server for crash of inkscape:
Retrace job failed
Analyzing crash data OK
Initializing virtual root OK
http://news.opensuse.org/2011/10/11/opensuse-announces-first-public-release-of-
openqa/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
is waiting for a sponsor.
I'd like to sponsor it.
What is the procedure? Do I change the
Assigned To:
Timothy St. Clair (edit) (take)
By selecting 'take'? It is not clear if 'take' if for sponsoring the package,
or for the review.
--
Sorry, I'm using the wrong terms. A BR was already opened by
Kapil Arya
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
I have discussed with upstream, and the asked me to take ownership of this
package, which I have agreed to.
What do I need to do?
--
devel mailing list
Just tried (and failed) update f15-f16. Using dvd (most reliable method).
Went fine until I hit an error, trying to update ipython. At this point,
anaconda just quit. No hints given what the issue was. No offer to try to
report the error.
It mentioned that it _might_ be caused by a problem
I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
I visited
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload.
But I get:
git push --verbose
Pushing to ssh://nbec...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/mercurial
Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: The remote
Neal Becker wrote:
I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
I visited
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload.
But I get:
git push --verbose
Pushing to ssh://nbec...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/mercurial
Permission
Tony Breeds wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:22:53PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
I visited
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload.
But I get:
git push --verbose
Pushing
Is it possible to push this update direct to stable to close this bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754741
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdiff3-0.9.96-5.fc16
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I don't want to change my ssh key that I use for many other purposes. What is
the suggested method to generate a new key to be used only for fedora?
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Just a friendly reminder: If you are a Fedora account system account
holder, and haven't changed your password and uploaded
The current release is 1.43
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
The boost maintainers have updated the boost package to the current
release (1.44.0) in rawhide for F14. More info here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F14Boost144
Rebuilds for devel packages that require boost are mandatory,
I received this:
unuran has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
On x86_64:
unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires /sbin/install-info
unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires /sbin/install-info
On i386:
unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.i686 requires /sbin/install-info
Repository : :ext:nbec...@cvs.fedoraproject.org:/cvs/pkgs
Module : rpms/mercurial/devel
Working dir: ~/fedora/mercurial/devel/
In directory .:
Message: cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
Message: Access denied: nbecker is not in ACL for rpms/mercurial/devel
Message: cvs
OK, got mercurial updated for devel, apparantly OK. Now try to update f13:
fedpkg switch-branch f13
Branch f13 set up to track remote branch f13/master from origin.
[nbec...@nbecker1 mercurial]$ git merge master
Updating f6a7cf0..33f33a6
Fast-forward
.gitignore |2 ++
mercurial.spec |
1. I just want to update mercurial in whatever way is easiest. I don't know
git. I was trying to follow the documented procedure, but I guess it's a
bit early and docs are sketchy.
2. What I used to do with cvs is a) update devel b) clone this to stable
releases. The devel and stable were
Linuxguy123 wrote:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=ODQ3OQ
I'm interested in this. I have noticed that for the past (several months?)
my system would freeze at apparently random times, while disk goes busy, for
periods of 20-30 seconds. This did not used to happen. I
abrt-1.1.13-1.fc13.x86_64
The only choice is 'log', no bugzilla! Why?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Neal Becker wrote:
abrt-1.1.13-1.fc13.x86_64
The only choice is 'log', no bugzilla! Why?
In abrt-gui, click on edit/plugins lists bugzilla under 'not loaded
plugins'.
In /etc/abrt/plugins,
I have Bugzilla.conf:
Enabled = yes
# Bugzilla URL
BugzillaURL = https
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 08/17/2010 02:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
abrt-1.1.13-1.fc13.x86_64
The only choice is 'log', no bugzilla! Why?
Can you please run:
rpm -qa | grep abrt
to check if you have installed all the required packages? Or you can try
to install:
$ yum install
$ fedpkg push
Everything up-to-date
$ fedpkg build
Could not initiate build: There are unpushed changes in your repo
Clue?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Neal Becker wrote:
$ fedpkg push
Everything up-to-date
$ fedpkg build
Could not initiate build: There are unpushed changes in your repo
Clue?
Here's what I tried to do.
After clone, then build for F15 OK.
git merge -m Initial pseudo merge for dist-git setup -s ours
origin/{f12,f13
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com writes:
$ fedpkg push
Everything up-to-date
$ fedpkg build
Could not initiate build: There are unpushed changes in your repo
Clue?
$ git status
Andreas.
git status
# On branch f13
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/f13/master
Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 03:57:31PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Till Maas opensou...@till.name writes:
git config --add push.default tracking
push.default can only have one value, so --add does not make sense.
Ok, I adjusted it here:
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
No idea what this means.
It means it has been 10 commits since you have pushed (synced) with
the git repo living on pkgs.fedoraproject.org. Remember that you have
your own unique git repository living on your local system.
But all I did
Updating mercurial (stop laughing) to 1.6.3. I updated master, f14, f13.
Made some mistake on f12. Now:
git status
# On branch f12
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/f12/master' by 1 commit.
#
nothing to commit (working directory clean)
git merge master
Already up-to-date.
fedpkg build
Could
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
Am 26.08.10 20:58, schrieb Neal Becker:
Updating mercurial (stop laughing) to 1.6.3. I updated master, f14, f13.
Made some mistake on f12. Now:
git status
# On branch f12
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/f12/master' by 1 commit.
#
nothing to commit (working
I need to make a minor edit to one of the sources of a package. I want the
sources on my machine in a state so that emacs will recognize the files are
under git control and act accordingly, so I can do my edits and use emacs
vc-mode stuff to commit, diff, etc. I tried using fedpkg clone +
This article:
http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/security_mechanisms_in_linux_environment__part_1___userspace_memory_protection/
seems to say that fedora is ranking poorly in deployment of various
userspace memory protection mechanisms. Is this information accurate?
--
devel mailing list
Updating igraph to 0.5.4. Success for devel and f14. Then for f13 I get:
fedpkg switch-branch f13
Branch f13 set up to track remote branch f13/master from origin.
git merge master
CONFLICT (rename/delete): Rename .cvsignore-.gitignore in HEAD and deleted
in master
Automatic merge failed;
Todd Zullinger wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
Updating igraph to 0.5.4. Success for devel and f14. Then for f13 I
get:
fedpkg switch-branch f13
Branch f13 set up to track remote branch f13/master from origin.
git merge master
CONFLICT (rename/delete): Rename .cvsignore-.gitignore in HEAD
Any help here? I'm still stuck.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
FAILED: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with
status 30; see root.log for more information
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2506706
DEBUG util.py:260: Error: Package: 4:perl-5.12.2-137.fc15.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:260: Requires:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Neal Becker (ndbeck...@gmail.com) said:
FAILED: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with
status 30; see root.log for more information
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2506706
DEBUG util.py:260: Error: Package: 4:perl
mercurial has hard-wired to install .mo files under python_sitearch, and
i18n.py has hard-coded to look there.
On fedora, find-lang.sh is usually used to find these files, but expects to
find them in e.g., /usr/share/locale
Not sure what's the best way to fix this. Either leave .mo files
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users
certainly is a good thing. It gets problematic when you choose to make
things technically inferior just to please those kind of users.
We
Has anyone attempted a pyqt for python3?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I have started porting to python3. So far I have a patch for fpconst. I
have not so far been able to contact upstream.
Maybe we should start a SIG for this?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:36:23 -0400
Neal Becker wrote:
I have started porting to python3. So far I have a patch for
fpconst. I have not so far been able to contact upstream.
Maybe we should start a SIG for this?
From time to time, I try to enable a python3
Rex Dieter wrote:
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
On 10/20/2010 02:38 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Has anyone attempted a pyqt for python3?
I did. It failed (not on Fedora though and I didn't investigate at the
time). I seem to remember some symbol problems with QString class that
was reported
Adam Jackson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 17:07 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
BTW, it's annoying that rpm allows only 1 %files -f.
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.8.0
%files now accepts multiple filelists through -f (ticket #70,
RhBug:475359)
- ajax
I guess fedora guidelines need
I no long use these and do not wish to continue as maintainer:
qct
igraph
python-igraph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Sorry to be so stupid. I don't really have a lot of time to spend on this,
maybe someone can give me a clue.
I updated unuran master just fine.
Then I did my usual dance:
fedpkg switch-branch f14
git merge master
fedpkg push
fedpkg build
bohdi ...
fedpkg switch-branch f13
Branch f13 set up
I have no idea what these messages I've received mean:
root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libunuran.so.14()(64bit)
On i386:
root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.i686 requires libunuran.so.14
Please resolve this as soon
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTIxNDQ
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Neal Becker wrote:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTIxNDQ
An update:
http://lwn.net/Articles/521090/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I visit koji, and can see the build info. How can I delete the build?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Any ideas on this?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4722671name=mock_output.logoffset=-4000
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Elio Maldonado Batiz wrote:
On 11/23/2012 03:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:42:57 -0500
Neal Beckerndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Any ideas on this?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4722671name=mock_output.logoffset=-4000
The nss maintainer added a
Just tried fedup f17-f18. After digging for correct command line, I got it to
work. BUT,
after reboot it sits at fedora splash screen, which is pulsating. It gives
almost no indication that it actually isn't dead. Attempts to switch vt do
nothing, so no way to see what's happening. I
Daniel Vrátil wrote:
On Wednesday 23 of January 2013 16:32:41 Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Features/KScreen =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KScreen
Feature owner(s): Dan Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com
Replace current KDE screen
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
I have two F12 systems with texlive-2009 installed. On one of them,
pdflatex works fine. On the other, I get this error:
$ pdflatex simple.tex
This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt
Any truth here?
http://www.osnews.com/story/22872/Linux_Not_Fully_Prepared_for_4096-
Byte_Sector_Hard_Drives
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Updating : selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.32-92.fc12.noarch
64/215
libsepol.scope_copy_callback: audioentropy: Duplicate declaration in module:
type/attribute entropyd_var_ru\
n_t (No such file or directory).
libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed (No such file or
mercurial and tortoise-hg need (generally) to be pushed in sync. They
are maintained by 2 different people. What are suggested ways to make sure
pushes are synchronized?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
leigh scott wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 08:20 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
The maintainers should coordinate, and one of them should bundle both
packages
into a single bodhi update. It's the only way to guarantee they get
pushed at the same time.
josh
They would need commit rights for
On Monday 08 March 2010, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 03/07/2010 09:48 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
Updating : selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.32-92.fc12.noarch
64/215
libsepol.scope_copy_callback: audioentropy: Duplicate declaration in
module: type/attribute entropyd_var_ru\
n_t
BJ Dierkes wrote:
On Mar 8, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Steve Traylen wrote:
It is true that the separate .spec files are maintained separately. What
many people try and do is maintain them as identical, at least at the
start. Have a look at:
fc13 and fc12 are shown here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/mercurial?_csrf_token=9d135a7a59b1892cc911a5f075633fb7dd4ef993
But not fc11. So I tried to rebuild, and got:
2046149 build (dist-f11-updates-candidate,
/cvs/pkgs:rpms/mercurial/F-11:mercurial-1_5-2_fc11): open
Kalev Lember wrote:
On 03/13/2010 03:57 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Still trying to sort out coordination of our 2 packages by 2 different
maintainers that must be kept in sync. Surprise, one was automatically
pushed to stable due to karma.
Can that feature be selectively disabled?
In Bodhi
My cert was expired. I D/L new cert and rename to ~/.fedora-cert. Then run
fedora-packager-setup and it crashes:
fedora-packager-setup
Setting up Fedora packager environment
You need a client certificate from the Fedora Account System, lets get one
now
Traceback (most recent call last):
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mercurial:
22eac5602d777f9601e23700e641503f mercurial-1.5.1.tar.gz
OK, so why:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2095322name=build.log
says:
error: File /builddir/build/SOURCES/mercurial-1.5.1.tar.gz: No such file or
directory
During the past few months, I've switched from building my software against a
bundled version of boost libraries, to building against the system boost libs.
On updating to f20, all of my software became broken, because the library
versions it was linked with were removed.
So I had to race to
Florian Weimer wrote:
On 12/18/2013 02:06 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
During the past few months, I've switched from building my software against a
bundled version of boost libraries, to building against the system boost
libs.
Is your software packaged in Fedora?
No, this is not intended
:
Neal Becker wrote:
How do others solve this problem
package your software as rpms too, so such dependencies get tracked.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
I was reading some of the discussion of feedback directed optimization and link
time optimization for python here:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel/143941
I'm wondering if Fedora should be enabling some of these optimizations?
--
devel mailing list
nodata wrote:
I've searched with yum, through bugzilla, and using koji. I can't find it.
Is GNU Parallel not in Fedora?
http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/
I can't find a review request.
nd
Isn't it part of moreutils?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Since the fork, I wonder if fedora is going to follow libreoffice?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Should I be concerned about these?
Dec 8 06:44:29 nbecker1 NetworkManager[22066]: error [1291808669.539204]
[nm-manager.c:1332] user_proxy_init(): could not init user settings proxy:
(3) Could not get owner of name
'org.freedesktop.NetworkManagerUserSettings': no such name
Dec 8 06:44:29
I just tried
rpmbuild -ba blah.spec
and got
configure: error: unrecognized options: --disable-dependency-tracking
I see
/var/lib/rpm/redhat/macros:
%configure \
...
--disable-dependency-tracking \\\
So maybe I need to add
autoreconf --force
before
%configure
to regenerate configure
How do I debug this?
git push
To ssh://nbec...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/mercurial
! [rejected]master - master (non-fast-forward)
error: failed to push some refs to
'ssh://nbec...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/mercurial'
To prevent you from losing history, non-fast-forward updates were rejected
Thanks.
I'll have to say, git's error message here is not helpful.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I pushed mercurial-1.8-1 to fc14 testing. The next day I unpushed it.
Today I did yum update. updates-testing is not enabled. I got:
rpm -q mercurial-debuginfo
mercurial-debuginfo-1.8-1.fc14.x86_64
Of course, I don't have mercurial-1.8.
So this is undesirable behavior. The debuginfo I
I've noticed scary reports regarding fragmentation on btrfs, some fairly recent
(within last 6 months). I'm interested in considering btrfs for my next f15
install, but should I be concerned about this issue? Is it expected to be
resolved?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2911659
error is here:
emacs -batch -l mercurial.el --no-site-file -f batch-byte-compile mercurial.el
emacs: error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: cannot open
shared object file: No such file or directory
--
devel mailing
Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2911659
error is here:
emacs -batch -l mercurial.el --no-site-file -f batch-byte-compile
mercurial.el emacs: error while loading shared libraries
3 or my packages are now parentless:
qct
igraph
python-igraph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Sounds interesting:
http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
3083146 build (dist-f14-updates-candidate,
/uncrustify:6a8dd0eea2183240177154f27c10a730f20994eb) completed successfully
Creating a new update for uncrustify-0.58-1.fc14
ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/save, 200, Error returned
from json module while processing
Luke Macken wrote:
Excerpts from Neal Becker's message of Fri May 20 07:40:41 -0400 2011:
3083146 build (dist-f14-updates-candidate,
/uncrustify:6a8dd0eea2183240177154f27c10a730f20994eb) completed successfully
Creating a new update for uncrustify-0.58-1.fc14
I'm trying to use nvidia cuda 4.0. It refuses to even try to compile with
gcc4.5.
Any chance of a compat-gcc4.4 on f15?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
koji watch-task 3103524
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
3103524 build (dist-rawhide,
/mercurial:cd1aebcad31e13ea42fdf0d51be65eb7230ffc66): free
nothing happening...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is x?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Neal Becker writes:
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is x?
You mean you want to specify the dependency's version in a macro, that you
put into Requires:? If so, just use the macro in your build script, it'll be
expanded, and you can test
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Neal Becker wrote:
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is x?
I generally do something like:
%if 0%{?fedora} NN
%global have_foo_MMM 1
%endif
%if 0%{?have_foo_MMM}
BuildRequires: foo-devel = MMM
%else
BuildRequires: foo-devel MMM
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 06/03/2011 05:19 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
So it is ultimately conditioned on fedora version, not foo-devel version.
Just curious, why don't you require the version that doesn't require the
patch?
In the future, let's say the patch will be required
I just compiled 'hello world.go' with gccgo on F15 and got selinux alert about
mmap_zero when executable was run.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and more involved
and frequent on users systems, particularly with advanced Linux
Neal Becker wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and more involved
and frequent on users systems, particularly
Gilboa Davara wrote:
1. Easy setup of networking (bridged).
Just to followup, to setup bridged net on kvm I need to reboot my server.
That's a non-starter.
And long as you're will to do the hard work yourself, there's no need to
reboot your machine.
1. Create a bridge configuration
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:00:10PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'll take google-droid-fonts.
Done.
-Toshio
I hope someone picks up stix-fonts!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
A little OT perhaps, but would installation of numpy1.6 onto fedora15 be
expected to break anything?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
0. F15 x86_64
1. yumdownloader --source atlas
2. rpmbuild -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
error: line 75: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttans):
chkconfig
How can it be that my system fails rpmbuild but fedora build is OK?
--
devel mailing list
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
Can someone see if they also hit this problem when building on F15?
(configure: error: unrecognized options: --disable-dependency-tracking)
If so, any hints? I'm stuck.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Nathan Owens wrote:
Does it still compile? I would think that it would compile even though
it says that. If so I would ignore it I believe
On 07/24/2011 12:31 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
Can someone see if they also hit this problem when
1 - 100 of 311 matches
Mail list logo
