Re: bad error on console / shell ... any idea ! ?

> On 30 Mar 2024, at 09:40, Cătălin George Feștilă > wrote: > > [root@fedora mythcat]# dnf5 search scV: __reassemble_comp_words_by_ref: > command not found > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::invalid_argument' > what(): stoi > V: __reassemble_comp_words_by_ref: command

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F39 to F40

On 21/02/2024 07:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote: dnf --releasever=40 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f40 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync Fedora KDE spin - Intel CPU AMD GPU -

Re: dmesg restricted to root in Rawhide

> On 28 Feb 2024, at 10:24, Karel Zak wrote: > > You can restore the original behavior by using: > ># sysctl kernel.dmesg_restrict=0 > > However, be aware of the security consequences ;-) Given I can get the same information from journalctl -k what is the improvement? Barry --

Re: Login issues to lists.* and src.*? Any outages?

> On 22 Feb 2024, at 20:20, Christopher wrote: > > Are there any known issues right now for logging in to > lists.fedoraproject.org or > src.fedoraproject.org ? > Do we have a page for known outages? > > I can log in to

Re: Mounting USB Storage devices with "sync" option ?

> On 2 Feb 2024, at 17:58, Florian Weimer wrote: > > The second one is a standard SATA drive in an USB enclosure, and those > have write-reordering caches, as far as I understand it. We need a kernel storage expert to tell us the definitive truth on this stuff. I may be out of date on this

Re: Mounting USB Storage devices with "sync" option ?

> On 2 Feb 2024, at 11:30, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Yes, the kernel assumes that there are no such caches, but I think in > practice there are. I think this means that journaling file systems are > not working correctly, in the sense that you do not get just user data > loss if the device is

Re: fedora-distro-aliases - The easiest way to get numbers of active Fedora releases

> On 17 Jan 2024, at 10:57, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > Hello, > I just wanted to quickly announce a small project I did in collaboration with > the Packit folks. > > Do you have some tools or services that perform actions on all currently > active Fedora releases? And do you have to manually

Where to add new ssh key to my FAS account?

I have been changing from SSH RSA key to using ed25519 based keys. I cannot recall, or track down docs on where to upload my new ssh key to for my FAS account. Can you point me in the right direction please? Barry -- ___ devel mailing list --

Re: F40 Change Proposal: Optimized Binaries for the AMD64 Architecture (System-Wide)

> On 28 Dec 2023, at 16:58, Chris Adams wrote: > > Anything that depends on PATH entries is IMHO doomed to failure. Indeed, how would my shell get the right micro architecture into its PATH? Would konsole on plasma desktop picking up PATH from systemd? The alternative would be to symlink the

Re: FAS 2FA recovery keys?

> On 12 Sep 2023, at 10:32, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Am Di., 12. Sept. 2023 um 11:22 Uhr schrieb Barry Scott > : >> >> I have been updating my FAS account security. >> When I setup 2FA I was not offer any recovery keys. > > You can r

FAS 2FA recovery keys?

I have been updating my FAS account security. When I setup 2FA I was not offer any recovery keys. In the event that I lose FreeOTP on my phone how do I recover? Barry ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: SPDX Statistics - Flock edition

On 05/08/2023 08:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Tip of the day:     Do you want to validate your License string? Use: license-validate "$YOUR_LICENSE_STRING" I dnf installed license-validate on F38 Then run it to check a license and it does this: $ /usr/bin/license-validate BSD No terminal

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

> On 18 Jun 2023, at 17:41, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 06. 23 15:17, Barry Scott wrote: >>> On 17 Jun 2023, at 10:50, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> >>> Please avoid further rawhide builds of them until the side tag is merged. >> I have been fixing

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

> On 18 Jun 2023, at 17:41, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 06. 23 15:17, Barry Scott wrote: >>> On 17 Jun 2023, at 10:50, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> >>> Please avoid further rawhide builds of them until the side tag is merged. >> I have been fixing

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

> On 17 Jun 2023, at 10:50, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Please avoid further rawhide builds of them until the side tag is merged. I have been fixing pycxx and pysvn for python 3.12. I have released new pycxx and pysvn upstream that fix the 3.12 issues. But I did not see your message about not

Re: F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)

> On 19 Dec 2022, at 16:50, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > I also remember RHEL8 where we ship DNF as YUM. And DNF is very similar to > YUM - both are Python based tool. Anyway in RHEL9 the same tool is shipped as > DNF, because it creates a confusion. And I don't want to experience the same >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

> On 19 Dec 2022, at 17:40, Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 12:36 PM Barry wrote: >> >> Why is pysvn on the list? I the pysvn maintainer and i am active. >> I am also the upstream maintainer. > > The "main admin" is orphan. You should be able to go to >

Re: Why install rsyslog by default?

> On 25 Aug 2022, at 16:05, Robert Marcano via devel > wrote: > > On 8/25/22 11:02 AM, Barry Scott wrote: >> I just found that rsyslog is installed and by default creating legacy >> log files in /var/log like messages and secure. >> Now that journald

Why install rsyslog by default?

I just found that rsyslog is installed and by default creating legacy log files in /var/log like messages and secure. Now that journald has been in Fedora for so long this is useful default to install rsyslog? Barry ___ devel mailing list --

How to add epel9 branch to my package's git clone?

I want to build my packages for epel9. But that branch is not setup in git. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycxx How do I add epel9? Barry ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Cannot report selinux bug...

I was told to report an selinux bug. I clicked the report bug button and was asked for my API key. Then I created the API key and plugged that in and hit OK. Now I am being asked to unlock a keyring (?) with the name "default". It is not locked with my password. I'm on KDE. Is this "default" a

Re: remove-retired-packages feedback

> On 26 May 2022, at 14:52, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > If you already upgraded to Fedora 36 - what is your feedback about > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/latest/release-notes/sysadmin/System_Utilities/#remove-retired-packages > >

Re: compile a basic example to arm executable on Fedora

> On 13 Mar 2022, at 21:59, Cătălin George Feștilă > wrote: > > I asked because I don't think arm development is well implemented. An answer > would be as correct as possible from a developer who has worked with > something like this, considering that it is not very well documented and I >

Re: compile a basic example to arm executable on Fedora

> On 13 Mar 2022, at 20:46, Cătălin George Feștilă > wrote: > > I try to create a hello word arm static executable, with the default example > but I got these errors. > I search on the web and fedora packages to find a way to solve this issue. This list is for developing fedora itself,

dnf install removes /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.wants/myservice.target symlink

This is not for a package in Fedora, its for a package I'm working on for Oracle Linux 8. I install /usr/lib/systemd/system/myservice.target that has: [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target In %post I run this: ls -l /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants /usr/bin/systemctl --no-reload

Re: Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service?

> On 28 Jan 2022, at 15:33, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm sorry, this is entirely my fault. I provided symlinks for the binaries, > but didn't think of the systemd unit files symlinks. The services files were > added or modified to take into account environment files which

Re: Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service?

> On 28 Jan 2022, at 12:28, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:01:43PM +0000, Barry Scott wrote: >> I just had to fix a number of my servers that use node exporter. >> >> The service name has been changed. Why was this done and did no one >>

Re: Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service?

On Friday, 28 January 2022 12:01:43 GMT Barry Scott wrote: > I just had to fix a number of my servers that use node exporter. > > The service name has been changed. Why was this done and did no one > think about the impact on users? > > In the worst case I had a server fail t

Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service?

I just had to fix a number of my servers that use node exporter. The service name has been changed. Why was this done and did no one think about the impact on users? In the worst case I had a server fail to reboot because I had Requires=node_exporter.service in the default target. Barry

Re: Fix for python-tzlocal FTBFS

> On 22 Dec 2021, at 21:46, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 5:16 AM Barry Scott <mailto:ba...@barrys-emacs.org>> wrote: > I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec > that allows the 4.1 release to build. > > https://bugzi

Re: Fix for python-tzlocal FTBFS

> On 22 Dec 2021, at 11:12, Barry Scott wrote: > > I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec > that allows the 4.1 release to build. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583 > > I can raise a PR if that helps, but I have not done t

PyQt6 for fedora status?

I see that there are packages for qt6, but no python-qt6 yet. What is the plan for this please? I have built PyQt5 in the past and, time permitting, can offer help. Barry ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Fix for python-tzlocal FTBFS

I have added a patch for the spec file for python-tzlocal.spec that allows the 4.1 release to build. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993583 I can raise a PR if that helps, but I have not done that before so pointers to the work flow would be welcomed. I need the 4.1 version for one

Re: locale available in mock build for python package %check

> On 13 Dec 2020, at 16:32, Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 13/12/2020 16:26, Barry Scott wrote: > >> Is my way forward to add en_US.UTF-8 locale? >> What do I add to the spec file to do that? > > Adding a BuildRequire on glibc-langpack-en will probably do it. That

locale available in mock build for python package %check

I'm looking at getting the %check of the pysvn package working. What I'm seeing is the tests fail because of an issue with python3.9 and locales. The test code uses locale.getdefaultlocale() to find out what can be set and uses locale.setlocale() to init the locale. After mock fails to run

fedpkg push - traceback - and a PR created?

$ fedpkg push Enumerating objects: 5, done. Counting objects: 100% (5/5), done. Delta compression using up to 2 threads Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done. Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 353 bytes | 353.00 KiB/s, done. Total 3 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 remote: Emitting a

Live Image hanging problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768498

I see that this ticket is still NEW. I've update with my experience that the suggested fix works. It would be good to get this fix in for F33. Is there more testing I can do to help? Barry ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: It seems that gdb cannot find debuginfo on f32

> On 14 Jun 2020, at 08:48, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > > On Sun, 07 Jun 2020 17:22:33 +0200, Barry Scott wrote: >> python3-debuginfo.x86_64 3.8.3-1.fc32 >> >> @updates-debuginfo > ... >> Reading symbols f

It seems that gdb cannot find debuginfo on f32

I'm trying to debug a segv in PyQt5 and I hit a problem with gdb not finding debug info in f32. I have installed python3.8 debug info. $ dnf list installed | grep debug | grep python3 python3-debuginfo.x86_64 3.8.3-1.fc32 @updates-debuginfo

Re: How to debug live CD image?

> On 30 May 2020, at 14:12, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > On 30.05.2020 15:04, Barry Scott wrote: >> I use the KDE respin and it hangs at the same place. >> I waited over an hour to see if will continue. >> >> How can I help debug this? > &g

Re: How to debug live CD image?

> On 24 May 2020, at 13:21, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > On 24.05.2020 11:47, Barry Scott wrote: >> I have tested with both the Workstation image and >> the KDE spin image. Both get stuck at the same place. > > Can you check latest respins[1]? > &g

Re: How to debug live CD image?

> On 24 May 2020, at 21:55, Paul Dufresne via devel > wrote: > > Le 20-05-24 à 05 h 47, Barry Scott a écrit : >> ... >> But I cannot boot a live CD image as it gets stuck >> in "Monitoring of LVM2 mirrors, ...". This is not a >> new problem I hav

How to debug live CD image?

My desktop PC is happily running Fedora for years. Its on Fedora 32 now. It also has Windows 10 dual boot via Grub. But I cannot boot a live CD image as it gets stuck in "Monitoring of LVM2 mirrors, ...". This is not a new problem I have seen this for a couple of Fedora releases, but not reported

user services run during system-upgrade

I raise this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829799 with details that show that users sessions are started up and user services run during the dnf system-upgrade. This is clearly not a good idea. It has been triaged, but its not a RPM script issues as suggested. I'm not sure who

Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?

> On 10 May 2020, at 17:45, Igor Raits wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Sun, 2020-05-10 at 17:31 +0100, Barry Scott wrote: >> I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use some >> python 2 code >> on o

What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?

I know that python2 is a dead language, but I have a need to use some python 2 code on one of my servers. It's clearly on me to maintain the old code if I choose to use it. I use MoinMoin via mon_wsgi. After upgrading to fedora 32 I took the trouble to install moin using the F31 package. And

Re: RFC: Python minimization in Fedora

> On 15 Jan 2020, at 17:05, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > In Python Maint, we sat down and we came up with several ideas how to > minimize the filesystem footprint of Python. Unfortunately, the result is > horribly long, sorry about that. Did you calculate file sizes including rounding up by the

How do I add bohdi revelant tag?

I wish to push pycxx for epel7 how do I add a the epel7 tags? The following comment has been added to the python-pycxx-7.1.3-5.el7 update: bodhi - 2019-12-24 07:04:49.655106 (karma: 0) FEDORA-EPEL-2019-476f0d3c08 ejected from the push because "Cannot find relevant tag for

Re: Qt 5.14 update plans?

> On 13 Dec 2019, at 02:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Looks like Qt just released 5.14, I believe this officially supports Python > 3.8? So it would probably be a good idea to update Rawhide sooner rather than > later. > > Rex, I'm willing to help coordinate/perform builds. Christian Tismer

fedpkg update - Could not generate update request for f31

For python-pycxx I have been working on an update. The builds for f29, f30 and f31 all all good done on 2019-07-08. I can use fedpkg update for f29 and f30. But get this for master (aka f31?) when I ran it today. $ fedpkg switch-branch master $ fedpkg update Could not execute update: Could not

Re: Broken modules on rawhide

I see the same messages and its from a mock build. How does this relate to upgrades? Barry > On 27 Feb 2019, at 11:30, Lukas Ruzicka wrote: > > Why people disable the repo, I do not know. I might have a slight notion. > > However, you cannot upgrade from Fedora 29 to Fedora 30 with Modular

Self introduction: Barry Scott

I have become the new maintainer for the pysvn package on Fedora. I am the upstream developer for a number of projects including: * pysvn - https://pysvn.sourceforge.io/ * pycxx - http://cxx.sourceforge.net/ * Barry's Emacs - http://barrys-emacs.org/ * SCM workbench -

Re: Retiring pysvn (was Re: Orphaning pysvn (and non-responsive maintainer: ravenoak))

> On 25 Feb 2019, at 13:07, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:59 PM Barry Scott wrote: > >> Just heard about this. I'm the author of pysvn. >> >> I'd be willing to maintain the fedora package of >> pysvn. What do you need

Re: Retiring pysvn (was Re: Orphaning pysvn (and non-responsive maintainer: ravenoak))

Sorry this was supposed to go only to Kevin. Barry ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List

Re: Retiring pysvn (was Re: Orphaning pysvn (and non-responsive maintainer: ravenoak))

> On 18 Feb 2019, at 18:08, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 2/15/19 5:56 AM, Barry Scott wrote: >> >> >>> On 13 Feb 2019, at 13:52, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:01 AM Stephen Gallagher >>> wrote: >

Re: Retiring pysvn (was Re: Orphaning pysvn (and non-responsive maintainer: ravenoak))

> On 13 Feb 2019, at 13:52, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:01 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> I've been maintaining this for several years since the main admin >> (ravenoak) vanished from Fedora. I don't use it anymore (and most of >> the world has long since

GitPython update blocked by rpkg - how can this be resolved?

In this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360797 It is implied that rpkg has an unspecified problem with GitPython 2.0. This is preventing the maintainer from updating to the any GitPython 2 release. I'd like to know if there is in fact a problem with rpkg with GitPython

Self Introduction: Barry Scott

I am the maintainer for a number of open sources projects: PyCXX - C++ interface to python PySVN - pythonic OO API to Subversion PySVN Workbench QUI interface to Subversion MEINC_Installer - allows python code to packaged into

Re: ntp-4.2.6p5-11.fc19.src.rpm does not rpmbuild...

On Fri 18 Oct 2013 17:59:31 Miroslav Lichvar wrote: On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 02:14:40PM +0100, Barry Scott wrote: On Thu 17 Oct 2013 17:56:57 Barry Scott wrote: I need to patch ntp for my uses. But I find that the src rpm will not build on F19. cd . env PATH=/home/bscott

Re: ntp-4.2.6p5-11.fc19.src.rpm does not rpmbuild...

On Thu 17 Oct 2013 17:56:57 Barry Scott wrote: I need to patch ntp for my uses. But I find that the src rpm will not build on F19. cd . env PATH=/home/bscott/rpmbuild/BUILD/ntp-4.2.6p5/ntpd:/home/bscott/bin:/usr/loc al/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/sbin:/usr/sbin autogen -L

ntp-4.2.6p5-11.fc19.src.rpm does not rpmbuild...

I need to patch ntp for my uses. But I find that the src rpm will not build on F19. cd . env PATH=/home/bscott/rpmbuild/BUILD/ntp-4.2.6p5/ntpd:/home/bscott/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/sbin:/usr/sbin autogen -L ../include --writable -Tagman1.tpl -bntpd ntpd-opts.def