Re: Qt 5.14 rawhide
>Including a new Qt version in COPR is not a problem, problem is that many >packages need rebuilds (from KF5, Plasma, etc.) and that's quite a lot of >work. It would be great if I could rebuilt the packages to do the testing. I imagine something like fedpkg co -a qt5-qtbase qt5.14 would be great [master is 5.13] Than I can rebuild the rpms and test what not works. Also IIRC Rawhide was supposed to become somewhat rolling (the rolling distros have already upgraded or the great openSUSE build service, allows you to install whatever version you like, and develop via web front-end if not on you own computer or even make small .spec edits on mobile. ) Regards, Damian On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 9:41 AM Jan Grulich wrote: > > Hi, > > we recently did update to 5.13.2 which I think is enough for now. Main reason > is that we need Plasma to properly work and Qt 5.12 and 5.13 are the only > releases guaranteed to be compatible. There will definitely be people using > upcoming Plasma version with Qt 5.14 so once it's properly tested and fixes on > both Plasma and Qt side upstreamed and Plasma 5.18 works just fine, we can > then start thinking about it. > > On úterý 7. ledna 2020 12:14:03 CET Damian Ivanov wrote: > > Qt 5.14 is out since November. > > I understand that it may not be suitable for 31 yet (why not? rebuilds?) > > but at least should be in rawhide. > > > > It contains a bunch of fixes regarding high dpi and other stuff where > > custom patches were carried out by Fedora are fixed now upstream. > > We do not really carry many Qt 5.14 fixes. If there are changes you are aware > of which are worth backporting, you can let us know and we can include them. > > > Can we have Fedora Rawhide with Qt.5.14 or at least some copr or easy > > way to rebuild the Qt rpms as 5.14 using fedpkg or rpmrebuild? > > Including a new Qt version in COPR is not a problem, problem is that many > packages need rebuilds (from KF5, Plasma, etc.) and that's quite a lot of > work. > > Regards, > Jan > > > > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Qt 5.14 rawhide
Hi, we recently did update to 5.13.2 which I think is enough for now. Main reason is that we need Plasma to properly work and Qt 5.12 and 5.13 are the only releases guaranteed to be compatible. There will definitely be people using upcoming Plasma version with Qt 5.14 so once it's properly tested and fixes on both Plasma and Qt side upstreamed and Plasma 5.18 works just fine, we can then start thinking about it. On úterý 7. ledna 2020 12:14:03 CET Damian Ivanov wrote: > Qt 5.14 is out since November. > I understand that it may not be suitable for 31 yet (why not? rebuilds?) > but at least should be in rawhide. > > It contains a bunch of fixes regarding high dpi and other stuff where > custom patches were carried out by Fedora are fixed now upstream. We do not really carry many Qt 5.14 fixes. If there are changes you are aware of which are worth backporting, you can let us know and we can include them. > Can we have Fedora Rawhide with Qt.5.14 or at least some copr or easy > way to rebuild the Qt rpms as 5.14 using fedpkg or rpmrebuild? Including a new Qt version in COPR is not a problem, problem is that many packages need rebuilds (from KF5, Plasma, etc.) and that's quite a lot of work. Regards, Jan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Qt 5.14 rawhide
Damian Ivanov wrote: > Qt 5.14 is out since November. According to: https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_5.14_Release final release was not until Dec 12. Patience grasshopper. -- Rex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Qt 5.14 rawhide
I asked the same thing. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JKYCD27AXOSZWVRQWOJ4NFNM7NNGM6SQ/#JKYCD27AXOSZWVRQWOJ4NFNM7NNGM6SQ Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Qt 5.14 rawhide
Qt 5.14 is out since November. I understand that it may not be suitable for 31 yet (why not? rebuilds?) but at least should be in rawhide. It contains a bunch of fixes regarding high dpi and other stuff where custom patches were carried out by Fedora are fixed now upstream. Can we have Fedora Rawhide with Qt.5.14 or at least some copr or easy way to rebuild the Qt rpms as 5.14 using fedpkg or rpmrebuild? Thanks! Regards, Damian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
