Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-27 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Friday, 26 April 2024 at 15:47, Ben Beasley wrote: > Josef, > > I finished rebuilding everything in the side tag f41-build-side-88169. > Please create the Bodhi update. > > The packages cinelerra-gg and olive are RPMFusion packages, so there is > nothing to do in Fedora; any coordination you

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-26 Thread Josef Řídký
Hi Ben, Thanks a lot for your help. The update is submitted to bodhi for Rawhide. @Richard Shaw my fault about not giving you heads up about the planned openexr update. My apologies. Will do in future. Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-26 Thread Ben Beasley
Josef, I finished rebuilding everything in the side tag f41-build-side-88169. Please create the Bodhi update. The packages cinelerra-gg and olive are RPMFusion packages, so there is nothing to do in Fedora; any coordination you want to do with RPMFusion is up to you. For the curious,

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-25 Thread Ben Beasley
The side tag is nearly complete. I have finished rebuilding all of the packages in “my” list for openexr except Blender (which I’ll tackle soon). I discovered that an ABI-incompatible update was committed to the Rawhide branch for OpenColorIO, but never built, about two months ago. Since I

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Richard Shaw
Just an observation... I'm very happy for the assist, I don't have the time I used to for packaging and the dependency chain for this particular package is "fun", but as the primary maintainer for openexr, you can imagine my surprise as this announcement. Perhaps it would be a good idea to

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:05:08PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:15 PM Josef Řídký wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr package > > in Fedora Rawhide and f40. > > > > I note that there is a patent clause

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 03:48:28PM +0200, Josef Řídký wrote: > As the mentioned patent clause is there for 10+ years I might just believe > it went through Fedora Legal, as it is a much older legal related task than > I am co-maintainer of the openexr itself. > > But I am fine with having

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Josef Řídký
As the mentioned patent clause is there for 10+ years I might just believe it went through Fedora Legal, as it is a much older legal related task than I am co-maintainer of the openexr itself. But I am fine with having conversation with the Legal team about the proper SPDX license clause that

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:15 PM Josef Řídký wrote: > > Hi folks, > > this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr package in > Fedora Rawhide and f40. > I note that there is a patent clause which allows DreamWorks to revoke the patent grants under some conditions for the

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Josef Řídký
Thanks a lot. OpenCV package is ready to be rebuilt in the side tag, but is blocked by gdal and vtk packages, so once done, just a simple fedpkg build with side tag is necessary for opencv (no additional bump needed). Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Ben Beasley
I rebuilt openvdb. I am finding that the dependency chains in this set of packages are even longer than I expected. Considering that, and how “heavy” some of these packages are – and in the interest of not keeping this side tag open for too long – I am going to go ahead and start using

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-23 Thread Ben Beasley
I get a slightly larger list with fedrq: $ fedrq wrsrc -s openexr -F name CImg Field3D ImageMagick OpenColorIO OpenEXR_Viewers OpenImageIO OpenSceneGraph YafaRay blender darktable enblend freeimage gdal gegl04 gimp gmic gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free hugin jpegxl kdelibs3 kf5-kimageformats

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-23 Thread Ben Beasley
You can use: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?order=-tag_name=88169=1=1 So far it looks like we have openexr, gegl04, and jpegxl. On 4/23/24 7:13 AM, Tomas Smetana wrote: Dne Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:02:07 + Gwyn Ciesla via devel napsal(a): I tried to so synfig and

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-23 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 4/23/24 06:01, Josef Řídký wrote: So far only those two packages were built https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0=88169=-build_id=1 E.g. for opencv there has to be libjxl rebuild first. Similarly

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-23 Thread Josef Řídký
So far only those two packages were built https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0=88169=-build_id=1 E.g. for opencv there has to be libjxl rebuild first. Similarly for others. Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. On Tue,

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-23 Thread Tomas Smetana
Dne Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:02:07 + Gwyn Ciesla via devel napsal(a): > I tried to so synfig and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, and they need some of > the others rebuilt first: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2955/116742955/root.log >

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
I tried to so synfig and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, and they need some of the others rebuilt first: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2955/116742955/root.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3027/116743027/root.log --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Josef Řídký
Well good news, the F40 rebuild is not needed. It looks like there was an issue with proper bug report reference. Sorry for the disturbance about that in F40. But the Rawhide rebuild is still in place so please use f41-build-side-88169 for rebuild of dependent packages. Best regards Josef Ridky

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Josef Řídký
Hi Ben, thanks for the notice. I'll fill the FESCO ticket right away and wait for their decision. So let's call F40 only (not Rawhide) side tags builds on hold till the decision is made. Best regards Josef Ridky Senior Software Engineer Core Services Team Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. On Mon, Apr 22,

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Ben Beasley
Is there a specific reason that an ABI-breaking update in required in the stable F40 release? And would you consider asking FESCo for approval as required by the Updates Policy? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#stable-releases Note that if this update happens in F40

[HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Josef Řídký
Hi folks, this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr package in Fedora Rawhide and f40. List of dependent package should be following (please, correct me if I haven't found all): CTL ImageMagick OpenColorIO OpenEXR_Viewers OpenImageIO OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR blender