Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-11 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 10:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > > > are not sent anymore even for

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:02 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 4:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > > > I think that the basic problem is that the

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:57 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 10. 11. 19 18:06, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > >> are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 4:24 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > > > are not sent anymore even for

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-10 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 10. 11. 19 18:06, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss. If you think that the weekly "broken dependencies" reports were

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 06:06:22PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > > are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss. > > If you think that the weekly

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:24 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails > are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss. If you think that the weekly "broken dependencies" reports were useful, I could set that up again. After all,

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-08 Thread Martin Kolman
On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 17:10 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of problems in > > timely manner prior to the update being pushed? This is currently not > > optimal. > > I'm not familiar with

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-08 Thread Vít Ondruch
I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss. Vít Dne 06. 11. 19 v 21:32 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > Hello, > > it repeatedly happened to me that I'm notified by Koschei that dozens > of my packages suddenly fail

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 11. 19 16:26, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 07. 11. 19 9:55, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 09:25 Miro Hrončok mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:14 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 07. 11. 19 9:55, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 09:25 Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote: > > > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 07. 11. 19 9:55, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 09:25 Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote: > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-07 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019, 09:25 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of problems in > >> timely manner prior to the update being pushed? This is currently

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-07 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 06. 11. 19 23:10, Randy Barlow wrote: On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of problems in timely manner prior to the update being pushed? This is currently not optimal. I'm not familiar with an existing solution to

Re: Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-06 Thread Randy Barlow
On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of problems in > timely manner prior to the update being pushed? This is currently not > optimal. I'm not familiar with an existing solution to this problem, but I agree that it is not

Getting notified on broken deps from updates-testing

2019-11-06 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello, it repeatedly happened to me that I'm notified by Koschei that dozens of my packages suddenly fail to resolve build dependencies on a released Fedora. I usually find out that the broken update was sitting in testing for 7 days without any feedback, only to be pushed and receive