On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Michael Stahnke
stah...@puppetlabs.com wrote:
As a point of moderation, we could probably break out the FHS/stateless
discussion into its own thread, as at this point this has nearly nothing to
do with Puppet.
Good point. Let me circle it back around:
It
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
The /etc migration, however, is part of the stateless linux work
desribed at http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/stateless.html. They're
planning on resetting /etc to a pristine vendor state, and
basdically keep it that
As a point of moderation, we could probably break out the FHS/stateless
discussion into its own thread, as at this point this has nearly nothing to
do with Puppet.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 06:52:35PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
Given the profound discrepancies between the FHS 3 and everything that
systemd touches, I'm afraid it's become a confusing guideline for
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 06:52:35PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:31:10PM +, John Florian wrote:
Personally I do so using a scheme like /opt/$VENDOR/$PRODUCT/$RELEASE,
but to my
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:31:10PM +, John Florian wrote:
Personally I do so using a scheme like /opt/$VENDOR/$PRODUCT/$RELEASE,
but to my knowledge the FHS has never ratified anything like that. The
FHS seems
On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 23:21 +0200, Haïkel wrote:
2015-06-04 20:21 GMT+02:00 John Florian john.flor...@dart.biz:
I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but
haven’t heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they’ve moved to
an all-in-one packaging
of
Puppet 4, but
haven’t heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1],
they’ve moved to
an all-in-one packaging process that “includes Puppet 4,
both Facter 2.4 and
CFacter 0.4, the latest Hiera and Mcollective, as well Ruby
2.1.5, OpenSSL
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 01:12 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, John Florian john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but
haven’t heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they’ve moved to
an all
...@dart.biz
mailto:john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 01:12 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, John Florian john.flor...@dart.biz
mailto:john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but
haven’t heard
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 06:48:45PM +, John Florian wrote:
http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs/ch03s13.html
Thanks for that info. I've always referenced
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ before. Is that no longer
authoritative ... or was it ever?
It was authoritative for a
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 11:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:31:04AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
This is actually specifically addressed in FHS 3.0, released, actually,
_just this week_. See
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/lsb/fhs-30
and
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:31:04AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
This is actually specifically addressed in FHS 3.0, released, actually,
_just this week_. See
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/lsb/fhs-30
and specifically
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 6:31 AM, John Florian john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 01:12 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, John Florian john.flor...@dart.biz
wrote:
I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but
haven’t
:
I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4,
but
haven’t heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they’ve
moved to
an all-in-one packaging process that “includes Puppet 4, both Facter
2.4 and
CFacter 0.4, the latest Hiera and Mcollective, as well Ruby
On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 01:31:10PM +, John Florian wrote:
Personally I do so using a scheme like /opt/$VENDOR/$PRODUCT/$RELEASE,
but to my knowledge the FHS has never ratified anything like that. The
FHS seems to take a rather vague stance on /opt overall IMHO.
This is actually
2015-06-04 20:21 GMT+02:00 John Florian john.flor...@dart.biz:
I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but
haven’t heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they’ve moved to
an all-in-one packaging process that “includes Puppet 4, both Facter 2.4
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, John Florian john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but
haven’t heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they’ve moved to
an all-in-one packaging process that “includes Puppet 4, both Facter 2.4
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Haïkel hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
2015-06-04 20:21 GMT+02:00 John Florian john.flor...@dart.biz:
I’ve been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but
haven’t heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they’ve
moved
I've been curious how Fedora plans to tackle inclusion of Puppet 4, but haven't
heard even a peep on the subject. As described[1], they've moved to an
all-in-one packaging process that includes Puppet 4, both Facter 2.4 and
CFacter 0.4, the latest Hiera and Mcollective, as well Ruby 2.1.5
20 matches
Mail list logo
