>Including a new Qt version in COPR is not a problem, problem is that many
>packages need rebuilds (from KF5, Plasma, etc.) and that's quite a lot of
>work.
It would be great if I could rebuilt the packages to do the testing.
I imagine something like
fedpkg co -a qt5-qtbase qt5.14 would be great
Hi,
we recently did update to 5.13.2 which I think is enough for now. Main reason
is that we need Plasma to properly work and Qt 5.12 and 5.13 are the only
releases guaranteed to be compatible. There will definitely be people using
upcoming Plasma version with Qt 5.14 so once it's properly
Damian Ivanov wrote:
> Qt 5.14 is out since November.
According to:
https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_5.14_Release
final release was not until Dec 12.
Patience grasshopper.
-- Rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
I asked the same thing.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/JKYCD27AXOSZWVRQWOJ4NFNM7NNGM6SQ/#JKYCD27AXOSZWVRQWOJ4NFNM7NNGM6SQ
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Qt 5.14 is out since November.
I understand that it may not be suitable for 31 yet (why not? rebuilds?)
but at least should be in rawhide.
It contains a bunch of fixes regarding high dpi and other stuff where custom
patches were carried out by Fedora are fixed now upstream.
Can we have Fedora
