Re: Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

2021-01-21 Thread Mat K. Witts
This You? > All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. http://ssimo.org/ / lol On 21/01/2021 19:44, Simo Sorce wrote: > Wow resurrecting a 2019 thread ? > > A thread

Re: Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

2021-01-21 Thread Mat K. Witts
>>> ...the SSPL is intentionally crafted to be aggressively discriminatory >>> towards a specific class of users. >>> >>> Who are they? >>> >>> Can you identify this class of users please? > You can find the details quite easily using google if you so desire. wow... are you really too

Re: Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

2021-01-21 Thread Mat K. Witts
> Wow resurrecting a 2019 thread ? No, I am looking at something that was clearly aborted... when I visited this thread there were ZERO comments > A thread where the exact same question was asked also aggresively *and*  responded to by Ben Cotton ... It's not here. I'll poke around to find out

Re: Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

2021-01-21 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2021-01-21 at 13:16 +, Mat K. Witts wrote: > > ...the SSPL is intentionally crafted to be aggressively discriminatory > towards a specific class of users. > > Who are they? > > Can you identify this class of users please? Wow resurrecting a 2019 thread ? A thread where the exact

Re: Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

2021-01-21 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 7:31 PM Mat K. Witts wrote: > > > ...the SSPL is intentionally crafted to be aggressively discriminatory > towards a specific class of users. > > Who are they? > > Can you identify this class of users please? You can find the details quite easily using google if you so

Re: Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

2021-01-21 Thread Mat K. Witts
> ...the SSPL is intentionally crafted to be aggressively discriminatory towards a specific class of users. Who are they? Can you identify this class of users please? Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

2019-01-30 Thread Ben Cotton
John, You can see the discussion on the legal mailing list's archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/US4PKGDMBQRDYGIYVM2ETARJ5ZPU7TNX/#US4PKGDMBQRDYGIYVM2ETARJ5ZPU7TNX If you have further questions, le...@lists.fedoraproject.org is the right

Re: Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

2019-01-29 Thread John Harris
How exactly is SSPLv1 "aggressively discriminatory towards people of a specific class"? How exactly did you determine that the purpose was to spread FUD, and what do you describe as "commercial users"? -- John M. Harris, Jr. Splentity https://splentity.com/ signature.asc Description: This is

Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1

2019-01-15 Thread Tom Callaway
After review, Fedora has determined that the Server Side Public License v1 (SSPL) is not a Free Software License. It is the belief of Fedora that the SSPL is intentionally crafted to be aggressively discriminatory towards a specific class of users. Additionally, it seems clear that the intent of