On Sun, 2023-04-16 at 09:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 07:37:55AM +, Mattia Verga via devel
> wrote:
> > I've just tried a 'dnf system-upgrade' and got:
> >
> > Errore: Errore test di transazione:
> > il file /usr/lib64/libheif/libheif-libde265.so
>
I've gotten a similar result. Without --allowerasing:
Error:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- problem with installed package gimp-heif-plugin-1.1.0-12.fc37.x86_64
- gimp-heif-plugin-1.1.0-12.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
Problem 2: problem with installed
If I add --allowerasing, some packages will be removed:
Removing dependent packages:
ffmpeg-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 2.2 M
libavcodec-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37
@updates 9.6 M
libavdevice-free
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-free provided by
ffmpeg-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- conflicting requests
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 06:30:36PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > > - problem with installed package msv-xsdlib-1:2013.6.1-19.fc33.noarch
> > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
> >
> > I'll add this one to fedora-obsolete-packages.
> >
> >
> It looks like
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 07:37:55AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> I've just tried a 'dnf system-upgrade' and got:
>
> Errore: Errore test di transazione:
> il file /usr/lib64/libheif/libheif-libde265.so dell'installazione di
> libheif-freeworld-1.15.1-4.fc38.x86_64 entra in conflitto
I've just tried a 'dnf system-upgrade' and got:
Errore: Errore test di transazione:
il file /usr/lib64/libheif/libheif-libde265.so dell'installazione di
libheif-freeworld-1.15.1-4.fc38.x86_64 entra in conflitto con il file
del pacchetto libheif-hevc-1.15.1-2.fc37.1.x86_64
il file
Hi Zbyszek,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 1:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:34:14AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 10:30 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > dnf --releasever=38
On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 04:30:31PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 08:41:14PM -0500, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \
> > >
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 08:41:14PM -0500, Solomon Peachy via devel wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
>
Mostly upgrades, here are the other results.
Installing weak dependencies:
ipp-usb
x86_640.9.23-2.fc38
fedora
2.1 M
passt
x86_640^20230216.g4663ccc-1.fc38
Looks good, with a few downgrades:
Downgrading:
buildah x86_64 1.29.0-2.fc38
calcium-calculator x86_64 7.9.5-10.fc38
enchant2 x86_64 2.3.3-6.fc38
enchant2-aspell
Looks good here too:
Downgrading:
Lmod x86_64 8.7.18-1.fc38 fedora 258 k
festival-data noarch 2.5.0-16.fc38 fedora 1.2 M
fwupd x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38 fedora 1.8 M
fwupd-plugin-flashrom
On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 10:17 +1100, Ian Laurie wrote:
> On 2/22/23 20:30, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try to run:
>
> Looked good here, just some downgrades as follows:
>
> Downgrading:
> fwupd
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:30:40AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
F36 snowflake
Thanks for the heads up. Looks like the update got stuck. I've kicked
it. Now need to wait for the freeze to end.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-fa1d678565
On 2/22/23 06:12, Steve Cossette wrote:
I just tried on a second PC, and I see this too on this one:
Lmod
On 2/24/23 10:17, Ian Laurie wrote:
On 2/22/23 20:30, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
Looked good here, just some downgrades as follows:
Downgrading:
fwupd x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38
On 2/22/23 20:30, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
Looked good here, just some downgrades as follows:
Downgrading:
fwupdx86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38
fwupd-plugin-flashromx86_64
google-chrome rpm caused issues due to it's SHA1 signature.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 09:34:14AM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 10:30 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --
> >
Another system success:
Installing weak dependencies:
ipp-usb x86_64
0.9.23-2.fc38 fedora
2.1 M
oneVPL-intel-gpu x86_64
Success:
Installing weak dependencies:
ipp-usb x86_64
0.9.23-2.fc38 fedora
2.1 M
oneVPL-intel-gpu x86_64
22.5.3-1.fc38
On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 10:30 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null &&
On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 10:30 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> dnf --releasever=38 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f38 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --
> enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
I got
Error:
On 2/22/23 10:28 AM, Steven A. Falco wrote:
I got the following errors:
Error:
Problem 1: package opencolorio1-1.1.1-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libyaml-cpp.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- yaml-cpp-0.6.3-7.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
I got the following errors:
Error:
Problem 1: package opencolorio1-1.1.1-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libyaml-cpp.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- yaml-cpp-0.6.3-7.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package
I just tried on a second PC, and I see this too on this one:
Lmodx86_64 8.7.18-1.fc38
fedora258 k
Seems Lmod is of a lower version on Fedora 38 as well, compared to Fedora
37.
Le mer. 22 févr. 2023, à 04 h 30, Miroslav
Did this 16th February and it worked then, other then a few packages
missing in F38 that was in F37 then mostly Google Fonts and RPM Fusion
stuff
On 2/22/23, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 12:03, Steve Cossette wrote:
> Downgrading:
> fwupd x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38 fedora 1.8
> M
Mea culpa. I'm doing a new upstream release tomorrow, and will build
both as 1.8.11-1 -- I guess the drawbacks of %autorelease. From an
upgrade
Same here, lower version numbers for the following packages:
Downgrading:
fwupd x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38 fedora
1.8 M
fwupd-plugin-flashrom x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38 fedora
26 k
fwupd-plugin-modem-manager x86_64 1.8.10-1.fc38
Tested on three different machines. No problems with transaction conflicts,
just some package downgrades:
- inxi-3.3.25-1.fc37 -> inxi-3.3.24-2.fc38 (version downgrade)
- fwupd-1.8.10-2.fc37 -> fwupd-1.8.10-1.fc38 (lower release number)
A.FI.
___
devel
Do you want to make Fedora 38 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run:
# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'
dnf --releasever=38
32 matches
Mail list logo
