jwm license change

jwm-2.4.2 in Fedora-rawhide changed its license from GPLv2 to MIT -- Ali Erdinc Koroglu Linux OS Systems Engineering - Intel Finland Oy Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 Domiciled

Re: jwm

many thanks -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

I understand you take the package -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

ners >> >> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:23 PM, mastaiza <mastaiza...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Lord no one has the desire to take jwm >> > -- >> > devel mailing list >> > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > >> https://lists.fedoraprojec

Re: jwm

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Igor Gnatenko <ignate...@redhat.com> wrote: > Become a maintainer! > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:23 PM, mastaiza <mastaiza...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Lord no

Re: jwm

Become a maintainer! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 7:23 PM, mastaiza <mastaiza...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lord no one has the desire to take jwm > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://li

jwm

Lord no one has the desire to take jwm -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 06/01/2016 05:34 PM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: > > On 06/01/2016 06:21 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > So the answer to your question is that the papers say they work 40 hours > per week, but in reality they

Re: jwm

On 06/01/2016 05:34 PM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 06/01/2016 06:21 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: So the answer to your question is that the papers say they work 40 hours per week, but in reality they work more. The employment law doesn't prescribe the actual number of hours worked by this

Re: jwm

On 06/01/2016 06:21 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: So the answer to your question is that the papers say they work 40 hours per week, but in reality they work more. The employment law doesn't prescribe the actual number of hours worked by this class of employees, and the employer can set the work

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 01:31 PM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: I see you write from an @redhat.com address. Are you saying that all US-based RedHat developers get 45 hour work weeks or less? I'm talking about what the papers say, not the actual amount of work. I am not a labor lawyer so this is just my

Re: jwm

On 31 May 2016 at 12:39, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> They usually have a 60 hour a week job > > I hope this isn't accurate...? I don't know. I was using an old data point where people in the US software

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 11:56 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:31:04 PM CDT Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400,

Re: jwm

On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:31:04 PM CDT Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: > On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > > On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: > >> On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > >>> On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 11:31 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: They usually have a 60 hour a week

Re: jwm

On 31 May 2016 18:02, "Major Hayden" wrote: > > On 05/31/2016 11:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: > > I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering anyways. Do RH programmers usually work 60 hours per week? "On average", full time means 40 to 44 hours around the world.

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: They usually have a 60 hour a week job I hope this isn't accurate...? I didn't

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 11:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: > I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering anyways. Do RH > programmers usually work 60 hours per week? "On average", full time means 40 > to 44 hours around the world. I've even seen 30 hours being called full time > in some job

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: They usually have a 60 hour a week job I hope this isn't accurate...? I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: They usually have a 60 hour a week job I hope this isn't accurate...? I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering anyways. Do RH programmers usually work 60 hours per

Re: jwm

On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > They usually have a 60 hour a week job I hope this isn't accurate...? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

On 29 May 2016 at 17:05, mastaiza wrote: > and I think that at least half of the works on redhat > Just because someone is paid by Red Hat does not mean they are paid to work on Fedora. They usually have a 60 hour a week job doing some other thing on some other product.

Re: jwm

and I think that at least half of the works on redhat faster to find a new distro -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

On 29 May 2016 21:02, "mastaiza" wrote: > > > but what about the people who used this window Manager . I think its not respectful to the users > -- All packagers in Fedora ultimately are volunteers and we don't get too tell people they have maintain any given package.

Re: jwm

but what about the people who used this window Manager . I think its not respectful to the users -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

I'm guessing you are subscribed to this mailing list. Every now and then you get messages with subject lines like "Orphaned packages in rawhide". You could have seen it quite some time ago. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/219062 -- devel mailing list

Re: jwm

it is necessary in advance to warn about the deletion . or do I have to guess about this myself -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

Il 29/05/2016 19:18, mastaiza ha scritto: Hi . Started to update one of the computers on which stands jwm and surprise he's not in the fedora repository 24 . Hi, It was retired 2016/05/19, because it was orphaned for more than six weeks. Regards .g -- devel mailing list devel

Re: jwm

your I should follow packet . I just want to enjoy and not to think what else is there to remove in the new issue -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: jwm

It was orphaned in late February. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jwm/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jwm

Hi . Started to update one of the computers on which stands jwm and surprise he's not in the fedora repository 24 . -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org