To answer my own question, by the trial-and-error method, it seems that the
current default needs to be taken out from the conf file.
On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 02:48:52 PM CST, Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
Sorry, I had a question on the xserver_arguments in the slim.conf file.
Sorry, I had a question on the xserver_arguments in the slim.conf file.
The old (1.3.6) file had xserver_arguments commented out, but the new (1.4.0)
file replaces it with
xserver_arguments -nolisten tcp -deferglyphs 16
The default zserver is still the same:
default_xserver /usr/bin/X
Sorry, forgot to add: I will ask the slim-fork maintainer if he will sign the
release tarballs.
On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 10:51:14 AM CST, Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
Todd,
I only became aware of this fork yesterday, and have packaged it and put it on
bugzilla:
Todd,
I only became aware of this fork yesterday, and have packaged it and put it on
bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173236
Hopefully, someone who can will review and approve it. Someone did review it,
but is not eligible to approve.
Thanks!
On Sunday, February 26,
Hi,
Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> I have been trying to package slim again. The package does not come with a
> signature or a gpg key.
>
> From
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification
> I don't see an option of what to do if there is no
Thanks, so it appears that no GPG verification is needed in this case, then. I
thought it was needed for everything. Thanks again for the clarification!
On Sunday, February 26, 2023 at 10:29:30 AM CST, Ben Beasley
wrote:
“Where the upstream project publishes OpenPGP signatures of their
“Where the upstream project publishes OpenPGP signatures of their releases,
Fedora packages SHOULD verify that signature as part of the RPM build process.”
Most upstreams don’t sign their releases this way, so most Fedora packages
don’t need to worry about it. If upstream did provide
Hello,
I have been trying to package slim again. The package does not come with a
signature or a gpg key.
From
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification
I don't see an option of what to do if there is no signature provided.
Any suggestions or
