Re: Interleaved Mode (Was: Re: Using Go for NTPsec)

2021-07-06 Thread Eric S. Raymond via devel
Richard Laager via devel : > On 7/5/21 8:38 AM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote: > > > There is a close-to-RFC to handle this area. "Interleave" is the > > > buzzword. I > > > haven't studied it. The idea is to grab a transmit time stamp, then > > > tweak the > > > protocol a bit so you can

Re: Interleaved Mode (Was: Re: Using Go for NTPsec)

2021-07-06 Thread Daniel Franke via devel
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 1:40 PM Richard Laager via devel wrote: > > On 7/5/21 8:38 AM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote: > >> There is a close-to-RFC to handle this area. "Interleave" is the > >> buzzword. I > >> haven't studied it. The idea is to grab a transmit time stamp, then tweak > >>

Re: Interleaved Mode (Was: Re: Using Go for NTPsec)

2021-07-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx via devel
On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 12:18:26PM -0500, Richard Laager via devel wrote: > On 7/5/21 8:38 AM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote: > > > There is a close-to-RFC to handle this area. "Interleave" is the > > > buzzword. I > > > haven't studied it. The idea is to grab a transmit time stamp, then >

Interleaved Mode (Was: Re: Using Go for NTPsec)

2021-07-06 Thread Richard Laager via devel
On 7/5/21 8:38 AM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote: There is a close-to-RFC to handle this area. "Interleave" is the buzzword. I haven't studied it. The idea is to grab a transmit time stamp, then tweak the protocol a bit so you can send that on the next packet. Daniel discovered it was