Andrei,
On 06/04/16 14:39 +0300, Andrei Maruha wrote:
> Attached patch contains a little bit reworked function next_nodeid>
>
> [...]
there are two better aligned channels to propose patches (ordered
by preference, at least judging based on
Re: Adrian Vondendriesch 2016-04-05 <57034dc7.5050...@credativ.de>
> On 05.04.2016 06:21, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> > Its not a particularly high volume project, so for RHEL we've been
> > sufficiently happy with hash based tarballs.
>
> Ok, thanks for the reply. I think we will go this way, too.
