Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] RA as a systemd wrapper -- the right way?

2016-09-21 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 09/21/2016 03:25 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: > Hi Jan, > > Jan Pokorný wrote: >> Hello, >> >> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/846 seems to be >> a first crack on integrating systemd to otherwise init-system-unaware >> resource-agents. >> >> As pacemaker

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-09-21 Thread Ken Gaillot
On 09/21/2016 10:55 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 21/09/16 14:50 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> I like where this is going. >> Although I don’t think we want to get into the business of trying to >> script config changes from one agent to another, so I’d drop #4 > > Not agent parameter changes,

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] RA as a systemd wrapper -- the right way?

2016-09-21 Thread Adam Spiers
Hi Jan, Jan Pokorný wrote: > Hello, > > https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/846 seems to be > a first crack on integrating systemd to otherwise init-system-unaware > resource-agents. > > As pacemaker already handles native systemd integration, I wonder if >

[ClusterLabs Developers] RA as a systemd wrapper -- the right way?

2016-09-21 Thread Jan Pokorný
Hello, https://github.com/ClusterLabs/resource-agents/pull/846 seems to be a first crack on integrating systemd to otherwise init-system-unaware resource-agents. As pacemaker already handles native systemd integration, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to just allow, on top of that, perhaps as

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

2016-09-21 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 21/09/16 14:50 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > I like where this is going. > Although I don’t think we want to get into the business of trying to > script config changes from one agent to another, so I’d drop #4 Not agent parameter changes, just its specification -- to reflect formally what the