On 17/01/19 21:00 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > For instance, also Fedora project, ironically with the intimately > strongest inclination towards this project, decided to ditch it in > favour of Antora: > > https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-docs-overhaul/
[...] > My ask is then: how you feel about this possible change (addressing > intentionallh YOU on this very list, as an existing or possible future > contributor), if you know of some other tool comparable to publican, > or if you think we might be served with some other approach to > mastering publications with as little friction as possible (staying > with AsciiDoc preferred for the time being) unless we get something > really appealing in return (is there any cherry like that with, e.g., > Sphinx?). You tossing it here for possible future reference, more detailed article linked from the Fedora Magazine post mentioned that Fedora was also toying with what OpenShift documentation uses: https://github.com/redhataccess/ascii_binder once they were clear publican is not viable going forward and before sticking with Antora. It doesn't look very maintained either, though, and brings a whole new dependency avalanche with it (Ruby), too. -- Nazdar, Jan (Poki)
pgpzguzozsAmm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Developers mailing list Developers@clusterlabs.org https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
