On 18/12/19 02:36 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > [...] > > - based on the above, increase of redundance/burden, plus > maintenance costs not just at pacemaker itself (more complex > codebase) but also any external tooling incl. higher level tools > (ditto, plus ensuring the change is caught by these at all[*]), > confusion on combinability, etc. > > [...] > > [*] for instance, I missed that change when suggesting the equivalent > to pcs team: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303969 > but hey, they made do avoiding that configuration addition > altogether :-)
Oh, may be caused with this "maintenance" resource meta-attribute not being documented at all in 1.1 line (while it was introduced in 1.1.12 and now we are at 1.1.22): https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html-single/Pacemaker_Explained/index.html#_resource_meta_attributes Again, something we shall rather prevent (undocumented options, not even in some "experimental" section that would list provisions that may be changed or disappear again for things in need of some gradual, multi-release incubation). Can we agree on some principles likes this? -- Jan (Poki)
pgptN5ssh740u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/
