Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC][pacemaker] Antora as a successor for the current publication platform base on (abandoned?) publican

2019-01-22 Thread Jan Pokorný
On 17/01/19 21:00 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > For instance, also Fedora project, ironically with the intimately > strongest inclination towards this project, decided to ditch it in > favour of Antora: > > https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-docs-overhaul/ [...] > My ask is then: how you feel

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC][pacemaker] Antora as a successor for the current publication platform base on (abandoned?) publican

2019-01-17 Thread Jan Pokorný
> Antora looks interesting. The biggest downside vs publican is that it > appears to be only a static website generator, i.e. it would not > generate PDF, epub, or single-page HTML the way we do now. Couple of good questions was, coincidentally, raised "yesterday":

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC][pacemaker] Antora as a successor for the current publication platform base on (abandoned?) publican

2019-01-17 Thread Ken Gaillot
On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 21:00 +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > I am now talking about documents as available, e.g., at: > > https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/ (Versioned documentation) > > Sadly, I've come to realize that publican is no longer being > developed, and while this alone is bearable

[ClusterLabs Developers] [RFC][pacemaker] Antora as a successor for the current publication platform base on (abandoned?) publican

2019-01-17 Thread Jan Pokorný
I am now talking about documents as available, e.g., at: https://clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/doc/ (Versioned documentation) Sadly, I've come to realize that publican is no longer being developed, and while this alone is bearable since it fulfills its role well, worse, some distros are not (going