On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 06:53:44PM +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
> I don't think that alone would suffice, I'd expect at least (port,transport)
> pair to be reasonably unique as long as you can remap TCP/UDP independently
> (I am not sure, but would be no surprise) -- but hey, we have just hit
>
On 19/07/17 09:49 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 01:20 AM, Valentin Vidic wrote:
>> Another issue with the rkt containers is the port-mapping. Each container
>> defines exposed ports:
>>
>> "ports": [
>> {
>> "name": "http",
>>
On 07/19/2017 01:20 AM, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> Another issue with the rkt containers is the port-mapping. Each container
> defines exposed ports:
>
> "ports": [
> {
> "name": "http",
> "protocol": "tcp",
>
Another issue with the rkt containers is the port-mapping. Each container
defines exposed ports:
"ports": [
{
"name": "http",
"protocol": "tcp",
"port": 80,
"count": 1,
