Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Proposed future feature: multiple notification scripts

On 12/03/2015 05:39 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 03/12/15 17:06 +0100, Klaus Wenninger wrote: >> On 12/03/2015 04:45 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: >>> Just thinking out loud, Pacemaker is well adapted to cope with >>> asymmetric/heterogenous nodes (incl. user-assisted opti

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Proposed future feature: multiple notification scripts

On 12/03/2015 04:45 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 02/12/15 17:23 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> This will be of interest to cluster front-end developers and anyone who >> needs event notifications ... >> >> One of the new features in Pacemaker 1.1.14 will be built-in >> notifications of cluster

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

On 07/19/2016 04:33 PM, Oyvind Albrigtsen wrote: > On 19/07/16 14:35, Lars Ellenberg wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:13:42AM -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: >>> A suggestion came up recently to formalize a new version of the OCF >>> resource agent API standard[1]. >>> >>> The main goal would be to

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Potential logo for Cluster Labs

On 08/25/2016 04:53 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 25/08/16 09:17 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> On 08/25/2016 09:02 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: >>> Klaus Wenninger <kwenn...@redhat.com> writes: >>> >>>> On 08/25/2016 03:13 PM, Andrew Price wrote: &

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF

On 08/18/2016 05:16 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > On 08/18/2016 08:31 AM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: >> Jan Pokorný writes: >> >>> Thinking about that, ClusterLabs may be considered a brand established >>> well enough for "clusterlabs" provider to work better than anything >>>

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Potential logo for Cluster Labs

On 08/24/2016 07:50 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: > I was doodling the other day and came up with a potential logo for > Cluster Labs. I've attached an example of what I came up with. It's > meant to subtly represent an outer "C" of resources around an inner "L" > of nodes. History of computing: From

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] moving cluster-glue to github

On 10/10/2016 12:07 PM, Kristoffer Grönlund wrote: > Adam Spiers writes: > >> Kristoffer Gronlund wrote: >>> We've discussed moving cluster-glue to github.com and the ClusterLabs >>> organization, but no one has actually done it yet. ;) >> Out of curiosity

[ClusterLabs Developers] sbd v1.3.0

Hi sbd-developers! ClusterLabs / sbd - repo on github hasn't received a tag for more than 3 year now. Changes since v1.2.0 like adding the possibility to have a watchdog-only setup without shared-block-devices legitimate a bump to v1.3.0. As there hasn't been super active development most

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] bundle/docker: zombie process on resource stop

On 07/23/2017 10:19 AM, Valentin Vidic wrote: > I'm seeing this state when trying to stop the docker bundle > with pacemaker 1.1.17: > > 15738 ?Ssl7:23 /usr/sbin/dockerd -H fd:// > 15742 ?Ssl5:31 \_ containerd -l > unix:///var/run/docker/libcontainerd/containerd.sock

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] bundle/docker: zombie process on resource stop

On 07/24/2017 12:37 PM, Valentin Vidic wrote: > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 12:19:20PM +0200, Klaus Wenninger wrote: >> Wasn't aware of the different behavior of pacemaker_remoted as pidone. >> If it is really spawned as pidone - which might be worth verifying - >> it should i

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] New challenges with corosync 3/kronosnet + pacemaker

On 02/19/2018 12:08 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 09/02/18 17:55 -0600, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 18:54 -0500, Digimer wrote: >>> On 2018-02-09 06:51 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote: On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 12:52 -0500, Digimer wrote: > On 2018-02-09 03:27 AM, Jan Pokorný wrote:

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Impact of changing Pacemaker daemon names on other projects?

On 04/16/2018 01:52 PM, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 29/03/18 11:13 -0500, Ken Gaillot wrote: >> As I'm sure you've seen, there is a strong sentiment on the users list >> to change all the Pacemaker daemon names in Pacemaker 2.0.0, mainly to >> make it easier to read the logs. >> >> This will obviously

[ClusterLabs Developers] Pacemaker pull request policy for 2.0.4

for the 2.0.4 release. -- Klaus Wenninger ___ Manage your subscription: https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/

[ClusterLabs Developers] All Pacemaker pull requests to master again after release of 2.0.4

Hi all, Now that 2.0.4 is released we're back to our standard pull request policy: Pull requests both with new features as well as bug fixes should be submitted against the master branch. -- Klaus Wenninger ___ Manage your subscription: https

[ClusterLabs Developers] sbd v1.5.0

Hi sbd - developers & users! Thanks to everybody for contributing to tests and further development. Changes since 1.4.2 - default to resource-syncing with pacemaker in spec-file and configure.ac This default has to match between sbd and pacemaker and thus qualifies this release for a

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] pacemaker POC to execute external program in case of RA timeout

On 5/31/21 10:53 AM, Emil Penchev wrote: Hi all, I'm writing about an issue we have received from a pacemaker user about RA timeout. Some users have encountered a timeout from RA script/program and this led to a major outage for them. Typical of these types of cases, there is no additional

[ClusterLabs Developers] sbd v1.5.1

Hi sbd - developers & users! Thanks to everybody for contributing to tests and further development. Changes since 1.5.1 - improve/fix cmdline handling - tell the actual watchdog device specified with -w - tolerate and strip any leading spaces of commandline option values - Sanitize

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Opinions wanted: OCF agent types

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:06 AM Reid Wahl wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 1:01 PM Ken Gaillot wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > OCF 1.1 hasn't been out that long but I'm already looking ahead to OCF > > 1.2 (which would remain backward-compatible). > > > > One big addition I'm contemplating is

[ClusterLabs Developers] sbd v1.5.2

Hi sbd - developers & users! Thanks to everybody for contributing to tests and further development. Only functional change is the first topic in the list below. And even that is 'just' refusing startup in a case where the config anyway wouldn't have led to a successful cluster startup. Improved

Re: [ClusterLabs Developers] Does pacemaker support to receive the event of VIP changes?

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 9:01 AM Qing Feng Hao wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Sorry to bother, I have setup a HA cluster with pacemaker, and want to so > some special handling when VIP (virtualip) changes. VIP is the virtual ip > resource created by pcs like "* virtualip > (ocf::heartbeat:IPaddr2):