On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 10:44:08 PM MST Brad Roberts via Digitalmars-
d-announce wrote:
> On 2/28/2024 7:34 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 7:18:29 PM MST Mike Parker via
> > Digitalmars-d->
> > announce wrote:
> >> On Wednesday,
On 2/28/2024 7:34 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 7:18:29 PM MST Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 19:24:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I see that they're up on the NNTP server, and the web
On Wednesday, February 28, 2024 7:18:29 PM MST Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 19:24:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > I see that they're up on the NNTP server, and the web forum is
> > hooked up to them, but there is no mailing list. Is
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 20:19:30 UTC, Chris Piker wrote:
Hi D
Just a minor note. My simple bindings for the NASA Common Data
Format (CDF) library are listed on the user supplied software
page:
https://cdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/user_supplied_sw.html (scroll
down)
The library
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 19:24:32 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
I see that they're up on the NNTP server, and the web forum is
hooked up to them, but there is no mailing list. Is that
forthcoming and just isn't up yet since that takes some time,
or are these lists not going to have
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 08:46:13 UTC, Richard (Rikki)
Andrew Cattermole wrote:
As it has already had a lot of back and forth from Walter and
me with the help of Adam Wilson (very much appreciated!), it's
ready for a development forum post.
So Mike, once the forum is up, am I in
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 20:41:46 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
or start a discussion if there is disagreement on how to
handle this.
Although Github has discussions, why not just discuss them in the
`D forum`? This is `the forum`. Github doesn't have the
convenience of the `D forum`
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 19:45:53 UTC, Greggor wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 15:55:52 UTC, Andrew wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 15:45:06 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
Hi D
Just a minor note. My simple bindings for the NASA Common Data
Format (CDF) library are listed on the user supplied software
page:
https://cdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/user_supplied_sw.html (scroll down)
The library itself is absolutely nothing to crow about. The only
useful thing it does
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 15:55:52 UTC, Andrew wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 15:45:06 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/8925/files#diff-647aa2ce9ebedd6759a2f1c55752f0279de8ae7ba55e3c270bd59e1f8c1a5162R131
Why can't D have its own types?
I have to
On Tuesday, February 27, 2024 8:28:01 PM MST Mike Parker via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> Most of the process takes place in two new forums: DIP Ideas and
> DIP Development (dip.idea and dip.development on the NNTP
> server). The purpose of the Ideas forum is to determine if
> developing the
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 03:28:01 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
After discussion in a recent meeting, we're ready now to start
accepting DIPs for review. And that means it's time to announce
the new process.
Very excited to see this. I've already submitted my own DIP idea
to get the ball
On Wednesday, 28 February 2024 at 15:45:06 UTC, ryuukk_ wrote:
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/8925/files#diff-647aa2ce9ebedd6759a2f1c55752f0279de8ae7ba55e3c270bd59e1f8c1a5162R131
Why can't D have its own types?
I have to agree with ryuukk_ on this one; it's one thing to
maintain binary
https://github.com/dlang/phobos/pull/8925/files#diff-647aa2ce9ebedd6759a2f1c55752f0279de8ae7ba55e3c270bd59e1f8c1a5162R131
Why can't D have its own types?
Just importing this introduces dependencies on other system
modules
```D
import core.stdc.config;
import core.stdc.stddef; // for wchar_t
The first PR for Phobos 3 has been merged into the Phobos repo!
Now, to be clear, this is mostly a housekeeping PR that paves the
way for further work and there isn't actually anything useful in
it yet. We've setup the basic structure, DUB build/test config,
and copied over the modules that
Excellent.
I haven't heard anything about my export DIP, the last that was said
from Mike is that Walter might want to review it external to the DIP
process. Unfortunately no feedback beyond that so unless I'm told
otherwise, its DIP TIME!
As it has already had a lot of back and forth from
16 matches
Mail list logo
