On Monday, 28 December 2020 at 17:31:21 UTC, Murilo wrote:
In the past 2 weeks we went from 225 to 240 members in our
Facebook
group(https://www.facebook.com/groups/ProgrammingInDlang), an
average of a person per day. First it was an average of a
person per month or less. I wonder if someone
On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 at 02:31:36 UTC, Murilo wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
No, the OP clearly stated that he made the group "official".
That is a deliberate attempt to fracture.
I'm sorry you see it like this but my intention when I
On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 at 02:31:36 UTC, Murilo wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
No, the OP clearly stated that he made the group "official".
That is a deliberate attempt to fracture.
I'm sorry you see it like this but my intention when I
On Wednesday, 30 December 2020 at 02:31:36 UTC, Murilo wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
No, the OP clearly stated that he made the group "official".
That is a deliberate attempt to fracture.
I'm sorry you see it like this but my intention when I
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 02:31:36AM +, Murilo via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
> > No, the OP clearly stated that he made the group "official". That is
> > a deliberate attempt to fracture.
No, that's reading more
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
No, the OP clearly stated that he made the group "official".
That is a deliberate attempt to fracture.
I'm sorry you see it like this but my intention when I created
the group was to expand Dlang by bringing it to places
I'm happy it's working for you, but please do not present it as
an "official" group. That implies the foundation is involved in
operating it.
Okay, sorry about that.
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:36:47 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
I see what you are saying, but that is a "controlling" position
to hold.
Once a language break into the mainstream, there is no way to
control the community. Any attempt to contain the community to
this or that medium is
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
The topic is what approach is more strategic.
I see what you are saying, but that is a "controlling" position
to hold.
Once a language break into the mainstream, there is no way to
control the community. Any attempt
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:16:24 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
hostile ad hominem tone
[...]
deliberate attempt to fracture.
tu quoque.
Let's not assume any motives here. I wouldn't call it
"official" either (and
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 15:06:07 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
hostile ad hominem tone
[...]
deliberate attempt to fracture.
tu quoque.
Let's not assume any motives here. I wouldn't call it "official"
either (and indeed, the title on facebook doesn't include that
word) but no
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 14:53:43 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 11:34:38 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
Sorry but I don't think you get it.
So, this hostile ad hominem tone is why it is beneficial with
local groups... I've studied online communities for
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 11:34:38 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Not quite, if you split up then each community might have
stronger social bonding, but in terms of aggregating helpful
advice you will be worse off. It would be suitable for
geographic groups (e.g. for a country/city).
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 13:04:42 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
You have a valid point, but still I am sure the facebook group
is a net positive for the community. I'd see it as a digital
version of a local user group.
It certainly has some benefits, especially in the past when there
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 13:04:42 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
You have a valid point, but still I am sure the facebook group
is a net positive for the community. I'd see it as a digital
version of a local user group.
Yeah, I see no problem with the group existing. I think it's
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 11:34:38 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
Not quite, if you split up then each community might have
stronger social bonding, but in terms of aggregating helpful
advice you will be worse off. It would be suitable for
geographic groups (e.g. for a country/city).
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 11:34:38 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
For instance slashdot is very poor in social boding terms, but
much better than the dlang forums for aggregating helpful
advice. So the "learn" forum is beneficial socially, but does
erode the slashdot presence.
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 10:52:53 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
wrote:
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 09:05:45 UTC, aberba wrote:
So I'm sure the Facebook group will appeal to a certain
audience who use Facebook. I've been a part of all sorts of
Facebook groups related to my stack and I've
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 09:05:45 UTC, aberba wrote:
So I'm sure the Facebook group will appeal to a certain
audience who use Facebook. I've been a part of all sorts of
Facebook groups related to my stack and I've come to the
understand it's what certain people even prefer.
+1
It's
On Monday, 28 December 2020 at 17:31:21 UTC, Murilo wrote:
In the past 2 weeks we went from 225 to 240 members in our
Facebook
group(https://www.facebook.com/groups/ProgrammingInDlang), an
average of a person per day. First it was an average of a
person per month or less. I wonder if someone
On 12/29/20 1:42 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
On 12/28/20 9:31 AM, Murilo wrote:
> they thought a Facebook group was unnecessary,
Not only unnecessary but divisive as well. For example, because I will
never have a Facebook account I would never be a part of that group.
+1
On Tuesday, 29 December 2020 at 00:38:40 UTC, Murilo wrote:
And apart from all that, having an official FB group serves to
show Dlang is growing strong and proud, it shows the world that
Dlang is not dead(most people think it is).
I'm happy it's working for you, but please do not present
Not only unnecessary but divisive as well. For example, because
I will never have a Facebook account I would never be a part of
that group. So, can the open source community be a part of
Facebook groups *without* a Facebook account? Even if the
groups would be open to the public, why would
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:45 PM Ali Çehreli via Digitalmars-d-announce <
digitalmars-d-announce@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 12/28/20 9:31 AM, Murilo wrote:
>
> > they thought a Facebook group was unnecessary,
>
> Not only unnecessary but divisive as well. For example, because I will
> never have
On 12/28/20 9:31 AM, Murilo wrote:
> they thought a Facebook group was unnecessary,
Not only unnecessary but divisive as well. For example, because I will
never have a Facebook account I would never be a part of that group. So,
can the open source community be a part of Facebook groups
On Monday, 28 December 2020 at 17:31:21 UTC, Murilo wrote:
I'm very happy, at first the people here did not like my idea,
they thought a Facebook group was unnecessary, but what is the
biggest social media in the world? Facebook! So that's is the
best way to communicate with the world and
In the past 2 weeks we went from 225 to 240 members in our
Facebook
group(https://www.facebook.com/groups/ProgrammingInDlang), an
average of a person per day. First it was an average of a person
per month or less. I wonder if someone has advertised the group
or the world is finally embracing
27 matches
Mail list logo
