If we follow some of the suggestions on here, namely tuning off slightly ie
running at 7076.4 instead of right on the frequency of
7076.0, then it would be possible to decode 2 stations at once , especially if
one of them had tuned off a little, then they would
not end up on top of each other
Double-click the trace you want decoded.
Then double click another one. Works fine.
Joe,
Can sked with you tonight on VO-52 / Feld Hell
mode. Let me know what pass time is best for you
and we'll give it a go..
Tony KT2Q
- Original Message -
From: Joe Veldhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:40
Bonnie,
Thank-you for the contact on JT65A. You did confuse me with your
response and then for some reason you went from txing on second to
txing on first and I was not sure whether that was still you. Anyway,
solid copy and I was using about 15 watts into an R5 vert.
Darrel, VE7CUS
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:13:35 -0500
w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know the thing works, but there's this thing about a learning curve,
time accuracy, etc. So, I was kind of surprised when I actually
pulled off the sequence of making a contact that is located elsewhere
besides CONUS:
Hi Howard,
Congrats!
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, w6ids [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, All.
I've been playing with this mode and making piece meal contacts as
it were while learning. Mostly, I've been receiving.
I know the thing works, but there's this
All,
Per topic, deepsearch is great for EME, a wonderful feature. But on HF
is is of little value and will only lead to false decodes and stations
answering you when you haven't transmitted.
Decode menu, JT65, check No deep search
Hope this helps..
73
Bill N9DSJ
All:
Managned to work Al, XE2AT on JT65 with 5mw this
evening on 20 meters. All was using a 40 meter
Bazooka antenna with tuner. Turned the power down
to 1mw (according to Oak Hills WM2 QRPp wattmeter)
while sending 73 and Al heard me!
Amazing mode...
Tony KT2Q
Hi John,
Sure you already know this but the key was the 0 3
082600 1 -14 5.2 584 3 * GM4SLV SM2LKW KP15 ? 0 3
No RS decode but a deep search decode.
Joe provided us with wonderful software, but not envisioned for HF
usage. Guess we need to adjust abit :)
As I hope I made clear; deep
I don't believe it happened.
Would need to see it myself.
Opps, I did see it happen
Good going Tony and Al.
Bill N9DSJ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All:
Managned to work Al, XE2AT on JT65 with 5mw this
evening on 20 meters. All was using a 40
Well, Bill, I'll thank you for that. It answers a nagging question.
I've seen instances where I've seen myself being called by a
number of stations over time periodically.and I wasn't even
keying the rig. Can you explain what is happening - I DID have
Deep Search ON as I recall. Only
How would one format an HF call3.txt Guess I need to take
a peek at my folders and look at it. I'm assuming such a
file use is possible? It's used for decision-making by the
software sometimes in determining validity of callsigns or??
I'll bet it's discussed in the docs, but tell me anyway.
I agree that adding deep search with perhaps a separate file for HF
callsigns should work great on HF for weak signals ..
Elaine
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of w6ids
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 7:14 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Hmmm.. there's a lesson here isn't there? When no one
is looking, what do YOU do normally? Amazing, indeed.
Howard W6IDS
Richmond, IN
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 8:18 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] JT65 5mw QSO
How would one format an HF call3.txt
example from file:
ZS6GPM,KG33XU,,10/02
i think format is
callsign,locator,,date
additional entry would be:
HB9TLK,JN47HJ,,3/07
Guess for HF the EME entries could be deleted to avoid false detects.
Yes, I noticed my spectra was flattened . I was hoping it would not cause
my wife to leave me and...oh wait, wrong subject.
Seriously, I did some Spectra testing last night and found turning it off
solved the problem. Then this morning I received a message Unable to
allocate a bivariate
I am working on recompiling WSJT, as I mentioned to Cesco. I have got
it down to one unsatisfied link error, probably due to compiler version
skew (gmttime_ in Audio.so).
One goal is to change the PTT routines to offer more options...with my
K2 I use the RS232 command set, not the control
Deep search, in bozo terms. can be explained thus..
software is on, rig is on.
Software is seriously hunting for signs of a JT65A signal despite weak
signals, or more likely NO signals.
Sofware spots a fragment of something that might eb JT65A and say hmmm, I
wonder who this might be?
Software
Would it be beneficial for stations calling CQ to transmit on even minutes
(TX first) , while stations answering CQ's use odd minutes (TX second) ???
Jus wonderin ..
Elaine / WA6UBE
Since the exchange isn't more than 7 characters on either side (3 for
count and class, space, 3 for section) it looks like it would work
plenty well for FD contesting.
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:08:17 -0400, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can type anything you want in the TX1 to TX6
-I think that is a great idea.
-- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patricia \(Elaine\) Gibbons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be beneficial for stations calling CQ to transmit on even
minutes
(TX first) , while stations answering CQ's use odd minutes (TX
second) ???
Jus wonderin ..
Well done Bonnie, good to see you test this.
Andy.
On 4/19/07, expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com,
Darrel Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonnie,
Thank-you for the contact on JT65A. You did confuse me with your
The digital radio group is currently experiencing about a 50% increase
in the message volume due to an explosion of interest in the use of
JT65A digital mode on HF. The digitalradio group remains a group
dedicated to the discussion of all digital radio modes despite the
intensive interest in
Can you offer 30 second TX as an option?
On 4/19/07, Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am working on recompiling WSJT, as I mentioned to Cesco. I have got
it down to one unsatisfied link error, probably due to compiler version
skew (gmttime_ in Audio.so).
One goal is to change
Bill...
Glad you were watching that! I was thinking about
shooting a short video to show how well the mode
performs with super-low pwer. We might encourage
others to start a sub group of JT65 QRPp operators
; ).
Thanks for your patients and reports.
Tony KT2Q
- Original Message
25 matches
Mail list logo
