[digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols

2007-06-02 Thread Skip KH6TY
First, let me say thanks to all who were interested enough in the protocol issue to offer suggestions Usable on SSB ... ?? I have worked New York state from tampabay on USB with stacked ku4ab squailos. I am not sure I understand Bruce's puzzlement. The subject antenna is derived

Re: [digitalradio] ALE How to do

2007-06-02 Thread Simon Brown
Sorry, Muppet here, replied to the wrong message. Simon Brown, HB9DRV - Original Message - From: Simon Brown Hi, Nice suggestion re: SuperBrowser, I'll have to work out the logic, but not tonight :-)

Re: [digitalradio] ALE How to do

2007-06-02 Thread Simon Brown
Hi, Nice suggestion re: SuperBrowser, I'll have to work out the logic, but not tonight :-) Simon Brown, HB9DRV - Original Message - From: Patrick Lindecker To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 3:22 PM Subject: [digitalradio] ALE How to do Hello

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols

2007-06-02 Thread bruce mallon
I was wondering what the center frequency was and the band width THAT'S WHY I ASKED IF IT WAS USABLE ON SSB. I had 7 over 7 skeleton-slot beams made in England in the late 1960 and I'm WELL aware of that array. As for BIG WHEELS had them too a stacked pair and have given thought to building

Re: [digitalradio] HFLINK Comments to ARRL on Development of New HF Digital Comm Protocols]

2007-06-02 Thread Art Botterell
They say it's not an RFP, and I have no reason to doubt that, but that still leaves me wondering what the League's query actually IS. Has there been any articulation of what the League's purpose might be in soliciting these comments? Is this a foray into standards- setting? Product

[digitalradio] Re: HFLINK Comments to ARRL on Development of New HF Digital Comm Protocols]

2007-06-02 Thread artbotterell
I'm still a bit confused by this whole process. Accepting that the League's query wasn't an RFP, does anyone know with any certainty what it IS? Is some sort of standard-setting envisioned here? Or something else? - Art KD6O

[digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols

2007-06-02 Thread felineveterinarian
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Howard Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is also a significant improvement in using horizontal polarization compared to vertical polarization (RCA established this years ago for TV and that is why TV signals are horizontally polarized). Good

[digitalradio] QRM using My Call

2007-06-02 Thread aa0oi
Hi Group: I'm am advising all my groups that a QRM'er is using my call sign on several different modes and many different freq's.., This has been reported to the FCC, ARRL, and homeland security,, but he continues.. I have heard him on MFSK, PSK31, SSTV and Digital SSTV and he is probley

[digitalradio] FCC's Riley Cross Clarify

2007-06-02 Thread kd4e
The statements of Riley Hollingsworth and Bill Cross at Dayton should finally un-muddle the automatic operations debate. It is now a closed issue at the FCC - *every* station *must* prevent QRM of other stations. Period. No exceptions. We can now report documented patterns of interference from