Seems well founded. Even when HF operation has been traditionally on
JT65A, the wider modes
(JT65B and JT65C) might prove better, in spite of being wider (ugh !!
horror, more wide modes !!...he, he)
Nevertheless, I am not sure but I believe that JT65C is not even 1 kHz
wide.
73,
Jose, CO2JA
Right. and for the newer no code hams this will help how?
At 04:18 PM 1/6/2008, you wrote:
IDing in CW has the benefits that its universally understood, requires no
decoding software, and is trivial to implement.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
Sorry I was not ably to jump in on this.
I have been just to busy trying to get things ready to sell
my company.
What frequency have they been running this on?
And what time of the day or evening.
John
Almost anyone can learn to decode a callsign and mode designator conveyed
via 10 WPM CW, John. Worst case, you can write down the dots and dashes and
decode it after the fact.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello to all,
I had a surprise chat with NO4Y, Herman, Elizabeth City, NC
at 1746Z on14.080 dial today. Nice signal into Richmond, IN
and I have to say it was GREAT fun using my archaic, out-of-
date, PK-232MBX and XPware software.
Of course, my activity was not without blemish. While
Andy, you may use MMANA which is freeware and relatively easy to use
http://mmhamsoft.amateur-radio.ca/mmana/index.htm
There is some help available as well.
Please note, however, that normally the model doesn't cover the full
reality, i.e. there will be an impact of the surrounding trees,
