Re: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread bruce mallon
EVEN the arrl is calling us LEGACY modes .. the excuse is it is used in industry for anolog modes.   Now It seems to me that if they want to matain members and digital; want to win people over this is not going to help .. --- On Sat, 3/7/09, Dave Bernstein aa...@ambersoft.com wrote:

[digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread Dave Bernstein
AA6YQ comments below --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, bruce mallon wa4...@... wrote: EVEN the arrl is calling us LEGACY modes .. the excuse is it is used in industry for anolog modes.   Now It seems to me that if they want to matain members and digital; want to win people over this is

[digitalradio] Propnet spam

2009-03-08 Thread Andy obrien
The folks at Propnet have always been good hams in my opinion. However I was surprised to get email from Propnet after my PSK signal was captured on 30M by their spotting system. Seems odd to have a radio transmission mined and email address looked up for a spam attempt. Andy K3UK

[digitalradio] Re: Legacy modes - was Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread Steve
I don't know what you mean by LEGACY mode users, and even if I did, I still wouldn't understand your question. Please elaborate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_mode While that refers to software I think we can safely assume it implies Behaving in a way different from its standard

[digitalradio] 6M Digital Activity

2009-03-08 Thread Andy obrien
With Spring/Summer close in the northern hemisphere, 6M openings may be more frequent. Previous discussions have mentioned how this rather quite band can be effective for various experimental digital modes. Does anyone have an suggestions for ways we may stimulate some more digital activity on

RE: [digitalradio] 6M Digital Activity

2009-03-08 Thread Dave 'Doc' Corio
Would there be any way to add 6M spots to the K3UK digital pages we already have? Since the folks there are looking for digital anyway, almost seems a natural evolution. 73 Dave KB3MOW -Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread bruce mallon
Your response above does not clarify your original post; if anything, it increases the ambiguity   NO IT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION .   Same old stuff its digital or the highway .   Have a nice day   Bruce

[digitalradio] Legacy modes - was Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread bruce mallon
Now I feel it's a much different story. So to determine what the standard operations are, you really have to look around and look at magazines like RF design, Urgent Communications. I WORK in public safety ..    Our system here is ANALOG . both on the county and Jail systems .   We use

RE: [digitalradio] Legacy modes - was Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread John Bradley
ARRRGH!!! enough already!! Why don't you lids take this off post and leave the rest of us in peace!! John VE5MU

Re: [digitalradio] Legacy modes - was Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread John Simon
I agree John. I'm getting to the point of unsubbing. 73, John de VK2XGJ Sometimes I pretend to be normal, but it gets boring. So I go back to being me! - Original Message - From: John Bradley jbrad...@sasktel.net To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com

[digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread Dave Bernstein
This is not a productive interaction, Bruce. I disagreed with someone who insisted that others operate as he did, and you come back with Same old stuff its digital or the highway, a complete non sequitur. We're done. 73, Dave, AA6YQ --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, bruce

[digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread Christian Crayton
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Brent Gourley bg...@... wrote: But humans provided the emcom traffic to the machines, and the machines at the far end of the communication deliver it to humans. Without the humans, there is no communication. I agree. What I was referring to are

Re: [digitalradio] Legacy modes - was Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread Robert G Chimel, WA3LWR
I am with John and John. Enough already. John Simon wrote: I agree John. I'm getting to the point of unsubbing. 73, John de VK2XGJ Sometimes I pretend to be normal, but it gets boring. So I go back to being me! - Original Message - From: John Bradley jbrad...@sasktel.net

RE: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread David Little
-Original Message- From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Christian Crayton Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2009 9:05 PM To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Brent

Re: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams

2009-03-08 Thread John Simon
Well that's about done it for me. To all those Op's who at least tried, my thanks. This is my last msg. 73, John de VK2XGJ Sometimes I pretend to be normal, but it gets boring. So I go back to being me! - Original Message - From: David Little