The DigiQRP viewpoint other.
1. The RTTY is discrimination mode, not for QRP. We need something other
for contests.
2. MFSK16 is good compromise with pic-capability.
more info http://www.edutee.net/digiqrp
Test results: PathSim Tab, below pdf-file
Jaak
es1hj/qrp
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
With
Agree. QRO RTTY contesting is a plague.
LA5VNA Steinar
Jaak Hohensee wrote:
The DigiQRP viewpoint other.
1. The RTTY is discrimination mode, not for QRP. We need something
other for contests.
2. MFSK16 is good compromise with pic-capability.
more info http://www.edutee.net/digiqrp
Test
While myself, Sholto, and others have put a lot of time in to developing
spotting pages and sked pages to help the digital mode users find QSO
opportunities ( see http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/or
http://www.hamspots.net/ ) I wonder if the methods behind HRDLOG NET are
perhaps the best
*The results of the EA PSK31 CONTEST are already published.
You can view them with the following link:
http://www.ure.es/concursos/23-ea-psk31/1303--resultados-concurso-ea-psk31-ano-2009.html
Congratulations to the winners.
Joaquin EA4ZB
Contest Manager*
Hi Andy,
Let me know what you would like, I'll pass suggestions to Claudio. Maybe
other logbook writes would like to integrate with HRDLog.net - it's quite
easy.
My original idea was simply a web-based logbook status thingy...
Simon Brown, HB9DRV
www.ham-radio-deluxe.com
- Original
A quick review of the results shows just 9 North American entrants out
of 163 non-EA entries. Does this simply reflect the band conditions
or illustrate a lack of interest in PSK as a contest mode ?
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 10:07 AM, EA4ZB joaquin.ea...@gmail.com wrote:
The results
