I agree Jim, ALE400 would make sense. In general, the current failing of
standard ALE to take off are , I think, linked to attempts to popularize
ALE for emcomm use. While ALE concepts do lend themselves to emergency
communication nets, the gist of this thread is related to plain old ham
radio,
about the winlink concept, it now does do something
effectively, gets messages to a destination via variety of methods
..error free.
Andy K3UK
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, ROS diverted me and I am quite out of date with WINMOR and RMS
Express
Thanks for the explanation. A few years ago, I expressed concern that
hams were drifting towards the Internet and expensive PACTOR modems
for emergency messages. Now with RMS Express/Winmor, PSKmail,and
NBEMS , we have plenty of good HF options to choose from. The large
network of RMS stations
Good point. What you have defined , Rein,is the occupancy efficiency in
terms of time.. I was measuring efficiency in terms of bandwidth used.
Obviously the othe rmeasure is wether the message was deleivered. Using 5
watts for a 300-400 miles trasmission on 80M at night , PSK250 may have
needed
/PC_ALE_FORUM/
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Andy
obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
Just to make myself clear, I am not suggesting that we actually use the
standard ALE digital mode for calling CQ. I'd be fine with it, but it is
quite wide and would start
I know many are already aware of this, but take a look
N9DSJ-1 (EN52ti) Heard N6TE(DM12) on 3576.23 KHz -8dB at 03:32:00Z using JT65A
N9DSJ-1 (EN52ti) Heard K3UK(FN02) on 3575.99 KHz -5dB at 03:32:00Z using JT65A
Bill N9DSJ decoded two stations within 24 Hz of each other, how is
that for
-- Forwarded message --
From: jerrydecker daij...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 3:28 PM
Subject: [SDR-IQ] Re: SDR-IQ for sale
To: sdr...@yahoogroups.com
I forgot to add I accept PayPal
--- In sdr...@yahoogroups.com SDR-IQ%40yahoogroups.com, jerrydecker
daij...@...
It just sold...
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:02 PM, John Becker, WØJAB
w0...@big-river.netwrote:
Guess I better Google it to see just what
it is. Right now I have no clue.
My beacon is
K3UK-14 [FN02HK ].
I also produce
K3UKAPSK63:K3UK FN02hk
K3UKAPSK63:K3UK FN02hk
K3UK-14APSK63:::{1
K3UK-14APSK63:::{1
K3UK-14APSK63:::{1
while playing around..
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Jim. I have the software and am
Perhaps this is more like it...
K3UK-14APSK63:K3UK-14 [FN02HK ].
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
My beacon is
K3UK-14 [FN02HK ].
I also produce
K3UKAPSK63:K3UK FN02hk
K3UKAPSK63:K3UK FN02hk
K3UK-14APSK63:::{1
K3UK-14APSK63:::{1
K3UK
Thanks Juian, the Net14 instructions suggested 1800 Hz as an audio frequency
but I'll try 2100 and see if I detect any traffic. I do have APRS
Messenger.
Andy K3UK
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:28 AM, g4ilo jul...@g4ilo.com wrote:
I've never heard of Net14 before and don't know how it differs
From eham.net and HRD forum..
ill Pasternak (WA6ITF) on March 19, 2010
BREAKING NEWS FROM AMATEUR RADIO NEWSLINE: DAYTON HAMVENTION(c)
ANNOUNCES 2010 AWARD WINNERS:
Three amateur radio (ham) operators who have made significant
contributions to the Amateur Radio Service, will be honored
While transmitting on 20M today , using JT65HF software and
monitoring the W4CQZ Reverse Beacons for JT65A,, I was lucky enough
to get 9 stations report my signal strength from one 45 second
transmission. Take a look at the report each station noted at 2136
Europe. I was using my home made
-- Forwarded message --
From: k4...@comcast.net
Date: Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:08 AM
Subject: [wl2kemcomm] FW: Digital communications for IARU Region 2 Band plan
To: wl2kemc...@yahoogroups.com
Cc: winlink_programs_gr...@yahoogroups.com
All,
If you have seen the IARU's view of
While not exactly digital modes...
-- Forwarded message --
From: pauljmarsh pauljma...@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 3:07 PM
Subject: [SDR-IQ] Re: Impressions on SDR-IP
To: sdr...@yahoogroups.com
Some impressions of the IP is at
I have the latest version and do not see any keboard method in WINMOR.
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Howard Z howar...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone tried the WINMOR keyboarding mode - no ARQ using FEC?
How does it compare to Olivia?
Howard
Patrick, for the procedures i described, I am not using the SDR Direct part
of Multipsk, just the usual Multipsk with 3kHZ waterfall.
Andy K3UK
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Patrick Lindecker f6...@free.fr wrote:
Hello Andy,
It is really Commander that performs the band changes , then
Rein et al.
I scanned 10147 and 18105 today for six hours, alternating every 90
seconds with a 3 Khz range. I only picked up three PSk250 RS IDs on
30M and NONE on 17M. Each RS ID on 30M was not decoded well enough to
produce a callsign. Since Muktipsk looks for a de ** string,
perhaps
I read the proposed rule making and did not find any reference to
frequency/band. So, where is it saying SS is allow but only on 220Mhz and
above ?
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:11 PM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote:
Extensive tests on 70cm using ROS 16 baud spread spectrum have been
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
I set Multipsk to report to PSKreporter and Commander to change bands
every 2 minutes. Here is what I decoded from 123o to 2330 UTC. It
reads in reverse order, reading it from bottom to top will give you a
sense of the band openings
18101943
11:49 F8DBF PSK31 18101511
11:46 I4GAD PSK31 18100502
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
I set Multipsk to report to PSKreporter and Commander to change bands
every 2 minutes. Here is what I decoded from 123o to 2330 UTC. It
reads in reverse order
I set Multipsk to report to PSKreporter and Commander to change bands
every 2 minutes. Here is what I decoded from 123o to 2330 UTC. It
reads in reverse order, reading it from bottom to top will give you a
sense of the band openings.
Andy K3UK
23:32 AD5DX PSK31 10142056
23:26 CO1RG PSK31
Who heard me today, so far. Not very active today but a few heard me.
How about others ?
Andy K3UK
Recvr BandModeDistanceTime (UTC)
F6DKQ 20m JT65A 3986 miles 21:38:51
GW3LEW 20m JT65A 3417 miles 21:39:15
MD0MAN 17m PSK31 3366 miles
My K3UK Sked Pages are now restored after the site was hacked on
Friday. For security purposes my ISP re-set my web site and deleted
all files . The site has the same address but has been upgraded to a
different server (supposedly better, faster). My apologies to the may
users that were
I am still waiting for my ISP to do a master re-set and then I will upload
files . Hope to get it back later today,
Andy K3UK
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
My Sked Page files has been hacked to send out spam emails from my web
site. My ISP has
This could be an interesting challenge, if not for the
points...perhaps the chhalenge of trying to work all the Spanish
provinces.
Andy K3UK
Sponsored by Unión de Radioaficionados Españoles (URE). The manager of
the contest is
EA4ZB.
Participants: Any licensed amateur station.
Date: 2nd full
Info courtesy of http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/weeklycont.php
Feld Hell Sprint: 1600Z-1800Z, Mar 13
Mode: Feld Hell
Bands: 160, 80, 40, 20, 15, 10m
Classes:(none)
Max power: 100 watts
Exchange: (see rules)
Work stations:
My Sked Page files has been hacked to send out spam emails from my web
site. My ISP has disabled the folders as a security message and notified
me. I will require a master reset of my web site , that may takes a few
hours.
You can use the back up site at
http://www.electroblog.com/sked/
Another survey of RS ID usage, this time on 80M. This was unattended
monitoring, I suspect the RS IDs were not from numerous stations.
14 MT63-500-LG
13 BPSK250
4OLIVIA-8-500
2OLIVIA-4-500
1BPSK31
Ideally, it would be useful to know how may transmissions were made
that did not
oops, sorry...I press approve rather than delete on this moderated spam.
Andy K3Uk
2010/3/10 morgane d morgane-d-bij...@orange.fr
Bonjour,
Nous avons le plaisir de vous annoncez que vous êtes l'un des heureux
gagnants de la Fondation Melinda. Les résultats ont été libérés et vous fait
A roger beep that substitutes RSID instead , sends mode/callsign and a
Q-sign ? In a PIC inside the rig.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Dave AA6YQ aa...@ambersoft.com wrote:
Unless you can convince the transceiver manufacturers to include the
capability in each unit, someone operating
Here are the results of two hours of monitoring the entire digital
band on 20M 14065-14110
37 BPSK31
25 BPSK250
04 RTTY45
02 MFSK16
01 CONTESTIA-8-250
Some of the above may be the same station (especially the PSK250) .
In just over two hours only 5 modes heard. Seems we still have some
ways to
Exactly !
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:10 PM, KH6TY kh...@comcast.net wrote:
Andy,
Isn't the current recommendation now not to use RSID for PSK31 or RTTY?
Take those out, and not much RSID use at all!
73 - Skip KH6TY
Yep, same concept.
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Warren Moxley k5...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ever heard of Mic-E protocol?
--- On Mon, 3/8/10, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 1976 FCC - Delete all Emission Types from Part
HB9DRV SDR-Radio updated 1e now available
http://www.sdr-radio.com/Downloads/March8th2010TechPreview1e.aspx
cool
Andy K3UK
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:08 AM, Rein Couperus r...@couperus.com wrote:
java runs even on windoze
the server needs a proper OS. :)
Rein PA0R
Nice way to put it :)
Andy K3UK
I was helping a ham get set-up for digital modes recently and turned
to the issue of interfaces for digital modes. I researched the price
for a Rigblaster Pro and was shocked that they sell for $299. My
friend settled for another interface that cost $69, new. I was
wondering about interfaces
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Arnaldo Coro acoro33...@yahoo.com wrote:
So, amigos at digital radio , my advise , and that's what I am going to
do, is to
alert ROS users of the possibility that the author of the software may even be
attempting to use it for other purposes that are not
While harmonics from modes like PSK31 are common, I have never seen a JT65A
signal generate what you describe. Interesting.
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM, g4ilo jul...@g4ilo.com wrote:
I was listening down around 14.077, just above some slow FSK mode which I
think is JT65A. The
Please get you last comments in on this ROS issue by 0500 UTC Feb 7.
This will give everyone a chance to cathart , get the issue fully
vented. Then I am going to invoke a cooling off period when no posts
will be allowed for 24 hours. Thanks.
Andy K3UK
Owner.
Further to our earlier conversation about using many of the concepts
in ALE networks for establishing digital mode QSOs, this weekend I
will be using ALE technology to scan the following frequencies
USB VFO frequencies plus standard ALE center frequency of 1625Hz.
3583
10143
14073
18103
24923
I can achieve a silent scan with PC-ALE and a TS-2000 but not with
Multipsk. Has anyone figured out if it is possible with Multipsk? I
know that with PC ALE you put the TS-2000 in split mode and it scans
with VFO B, then switches to VFO A (in the same frequency) before
transmitting a sounding .
I have it figured out now. The TS2000 is scanning silently with
Multipsk in ALE400 mode.
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
I can achieve a silent scan with PC-ALE and a TS-2000 but not with
Multipsk. Has anyone figured out if it is possible
Yep.
Andy
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Tom Phelps wd8...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Hi Andy,
Don't you mean March 7th, 2010? Just thought I would ask.
Tom, Wd8MBE
ROS still had problems in version 1.6.3 and it is easy to notice that it
works in a free channel, but does not stand burst errors (in fact,
errors long as a packet or pactor frame length) and its ability to copy
crumbles. That does not happen, at least so noticeably, with JT65 or Olivia.
04:48 ab9ft DOMINO 3584013
04:47 KA2TMU/2 DOMINO 3584008
04:37 AB9FT DOMINO 3583023
04:05 W3YJ OLIVIA 3583030
03:47 w3yj OLIVIA 3583498
03:45 W3YJ OLIVIA 3583498
03:03 nx8a OLIVIA 3584770
22:01 KB7RLY OLIVIA 18104067
21:16 N6CRR OLIVIA 14073571
I don't know of one. Pawel is a member of this group, so perhaps he can
chime in on this. To have one avaiable much like the PSK Core that Moe gave
the ham world, would be very nice.
Andy K3UK
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:27 AM, g4ilo jul...@g4ilo.com wrote:
Andy. Do you or anyone know if there
It has been a few years since Dominoex was added to our tool box. I
still see it on the air from time to time but not on a daily basis.
I wonder why it is not used ?
http://www.southgatearc.org/news/december2005/domino_ex.htm
Simon Brown is finalising an important update to his SDR-Radio
application . It was targeted for release March 5th but the date has
been pushed back to March 6 or 7.. Check http://www.sdr-radio.com
and click on news for info.
\
Andy K3UK
FYI.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bruce Brackin, N5SIX n5...@bellsouth.net
The PJ pages apparently went down last night. Use the nice backup
page(s) that Lee, AA1YN has.
http://www.aa1yn.com/vhf/vhfregister.html to register and set cookies
(like PJ) and then on to the ping
From the ROS web page
(https://mail.google.com/mail/?hl=enshva=1#inbox/1272ea080e273b49) ,
alleging that the ARRL views Chip64 not legal on HF. The language is
rather odd though.
We read the information and reviewed the CHIP64 information yesterday
and have come to the same place as with ROS -
-- Forwarded message --
From: wpanb...@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:02 PM
Subject: [wpaNBEMS] Ragchew, 3/6/2010, 11:00 am
To: wpanb...@yahoogroups.com
Reminder from: *wpaNBEMS Yahoo!
Grouphttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/wpaNBEMS/cal
* Title: Ragchew
ooops, I meant MARCH 6th
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:16 PM, obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
I will be on 432.090 mHz this Saturday Feb 6 at 1230 UTC . listening and
testing ROS 1 and 16. If interested, check in to the K3Uk Sked page
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/
http://ham2ham.com/room307_ros.php
FYI, Andy K3UK
Courtesy of http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/weeklycont.php
DARC 10-Meter Digital Contest: 1100Z-1700Z, Mar 7
Mode: RTTY, Amtor, Clover, PSK31, Pactor
Bands: 10m Only
Classes:Single Op
SWL
Exchange: RST + Serial No.
QSO Points: 1
-- Forwarded message --
From: ROS v2.5.0 Beta no-re...@wordpress.com
Date: Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:42 PM
Subject: [New post] NEW NARROWBAND DIGITAL MODE
To: k3uka...@gmail.com
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/author/rosmodem/ NEW NARROWBAND
DIGITAL MODE
I was disturbed when the ROS author suggested that he was considering
legal action against N3TL for merely raising the question of legality
in the USA. I am even more disturbed that the author of the software
has an apparent plan to include the callsign of certain hams in a
non-grata list ,
Thanks to all those that expressed views, nice to see varying
opinions. I will be rationing ROS related posts for the next few
days. No email will be censored, I will simply send them through to
the group in dribs and drabs, so that we can focus on a wider array of
digital mode topics.
Andy
The latest version has support for different comm ports.
Andy K3UK
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Tom wd8...@rocketmail.com wrote:
I downloaded ROS the other day and just tried it for the first time today,
but it will not key my transmitter. I have my Kenwood on Com1 but I see
there are
Good tests, thanks Tony.
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote:
All,
I ran several path tests with ROS-16 and Olivia 2K this evening. The
simulator showed that Olivia is about as sensitive as ROS when configured to
run at the same baud rate, but it is not as
Since the RS ID works well over this range with my SDR, I see no reason why
the MSG ID would not work.
Andy K3UK
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@tiscali.co.ukwrote:
sholtofish wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has used the MSG ID function in MultiPSK with
an SDR
Just to make myself clear, I am not suggesting that we actually use the
standard ALE digital mode for calling CQ. I'd be fine with it, but it is
quite wide and would start a debate all over again. I'm also not suggesting
we use ALE-style soundings that are unattended. What I like about the
From Jose's web site
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/fcc-ros-legal-in-usa/
FCC: ROS LEGAL IN USA
By José Alberto Nieto Ros
It ended the controversy about whether ROS is legal in USA or not. For
which they insisted on it was illegal: “A mamarla”
The case you submitted via the FCC has been
I like to multitask, and I am greedy... I like to keep an eye on
several things at once. I am thinking about a better PC, one with
enough CPU capability to run many tasks at the same time. Is there a
way to calculate the total CPU demands of severall applications. Here
is a list of what I often
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 6:10 PM, g4ilo julian.m...@theparklands.co.uk wrote:
To be honest I think the basic problem is just that there isn't enough space
on the busy bands for all the people who want to use a 2.2kHz wide digital
mode to use it. Because of all the QRM you just end up making
http://www.obriensweb.com/hrdsdr.jpg
FYI, SDR-IQ,, TS2000, SpectraVue, HRD, DM780 all fully sync'd and interfaced.
Andy K3UK
Log Periodic Dipole Array
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Ian Wade G3NRW g3...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
From: obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com k3ukandy%40gmail.com
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 Time: 06:12:07
Anyone have a link to the old LPDA DOS software? I found a couple of
on-line calculators but
Many thanks Myrton, the lpda software I have been looking for was at your
link,
73 de Andy K3K
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:00 AM, n1gke n1...@amsat.org wrote:
I hope you will find some useful software here --
http://www.electromagnetics.biz/Tools.htm
I will ask around of my local group and
From http://www.hornucopia.com/contestcal/weeklycont.php
BPSK125
Bands: 80, 40, 20, 15, 10m
Classes:Single Op All Band (High/Low)(24/12)
Single Op Single Band (High/Low)
Single Op Low Bands (High/Low)
Single Op High Bands (High/Low
Multi Op Single Transmitter (Old/Young)
Nice email feature. By the way, the version info says v2.1.1 but the exe
file says 1.3.1 ?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:50 PM, nietorosdj nietoro...@yahoo.es wrote:
Download here: http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/
And configure the Email menu
Discussion of ROS' legality was allowed to continue because of the
news from ARRL and FCC. The topic will be closed as of 25/2/10 at
1200 UTC. Get you final say in on the issue , if you wish. After
that, leave the topic alone for a while.
Andy K3UK
Andy
I have had a few more days to test it and watch how it does in QRM. Same
impressions, a good mode but not offering substantially more than the other
well known modes. In a couple of specific tests, Olivia 500-128 did better
than ROS 1.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Stelios Bounanos
interest ROS dont was used, i dont know why.
--
*De:* Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com
*Para:* digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
*Enviado:* jue,25 febrero, 2010 00:58
*Asunto:* Re: [digitalradio] ROS impressions so far
I have had a few more days to test it and watch
James, you will not have to LOOK. This contest will bring out thousabds of
RTTY ops and 80-40-20-15-10 will be full if those bands are open. The
ARRL band plan will be where you find them, but some operators will go
higher,
Andy K3UK
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:49 AM, James French
FYI
From: Henderson, Dan N1ND
Subject: RE: Spread Spectrum
To: Carol Fred deleted for privacy.
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 7:13 AM
Hi Fred:
I ran this by our technical experts. They concur that ROS is a spread
spectrum mode and as such is not allowed by the FCC on bands below 222
MHz.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tim - N3TL
Date: Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:58 PM
Following is the complete text of the request I made to the FCC for a
ruling on ROS use on HF by licensed U.S. amateurs, along with the response
from the FCC I just received.
As part of my request,
The FCC has stated , today, that IF the author describes it as spread
spectrum, the USA ham is responsible for determining the accuracy of this
claim. They also affirmed that SS is not legal below 220 Mhz. The ARRL
technical folks said today that , based on the description available, they
I often look at the CW signal on the waterfall when I hear one close to
me. My view is...if his signal is not exactly on the same part of the
waterfall as mine, we are OK. I can notch him out and he can do the same
to me. A couple of hundred Hz separation should be all we need.
On Mon, Feb
It seems unfair, especially because of all the hard work put in to
developing it, but I do not see it as any better than many other modes...
nothing that says gee...this is way better . It is GOOD, and a mode to
add to our bag of tricks, but not a killer app. The software interface is
very
That is a good point, Alan. Now that i think about it, you would think that
after 10 years we would have come up with a point and click method.
Andy K3UK
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Alan Barrow ml9...@pinztrek.com wrote:
jhaynesatalumni wrote:
-
My belief is that all the RTTY is
It seems that an invalid procedure error occurs if the the two email
addresses that appear in the @ macro for Baud 16 run together and the
ending of the first one, does not get printed. e.g.
emailaddr...@address.comemailaddress@address.com This is happened
at the moment every time SV8CS sends
I took a look at the IARU Region 1 and Region 2 band plans, removed
areas where there are clear differences (30, 40 and 160, I'll work on
them later) , and produced a plan that is compatible with these two
regions (I'll look at other regions). While doing this, and thinking
how easy the task was,
OK, while the USA drifts from the suggested IARU Region 2 band plan,
here is an almost compatible digital band plan, Compatible with
the Region 1 and Region 2 bandplan for digital modes with a couple of
exceptions where wide and narrow digital modes are mixed . I mixed
them because the USA has
I have compiled a letter to Laura Smith Esq, at the FCC, with details of
this mode. I will let you all know when I receive a reply.
Andy K3UK
http://www.obriensweb.com/bandmap.html
A quick and dirty chart. Comments welcome.
unattended modes at the upper end, where possible.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:16 PM, wd4kpd wd4...@suddenlink.net wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Andy
obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
http://www.obriensweb.com/bandmap.html
A quick and dirty chart
Good question Alan. It does seem quite robust but does not seem to add
anything that Olivia or some levels of Thor. Too early to say for sure.
Andy K3UK
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Alan Beagley ajbeag...@yahoo.com wrote:
Why this new mode? Advantages?
73
Alan NV8A
Anyone been able to test ROS 16 with QRM present ? It would be
interesting to use it on common ALE frequencies and see how it does
when a brief ALE sounding occurs. The description suggests that is
should be able to cope with the brief QRM.
Andy
http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/ click on digital
or... if you are greedy..
http://www.obriensweb.com/skedpskr4.html
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Toby Burnett ruff...@hebrides.net wrote:
I think I have lost the message. There has been so many, did someone
come up with a ROS mode
Well, ROS 1 and 16 look like good new modes. I think I will give up
on this mode until the FCC clarifies the legality for USA hams. For
those having fun With ROS, don't forget much the same fun can be had
with JT65A (ROS1) or Olivia (ROS 16).
I am monitoring 3576 JT65A overnight
Andy K3UK
JT65 too.
73
Sholto
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com, Andy
obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
Well, ROS 1 and 16 look like good new modes. I think I will give up
on this mode until the FCC clarifies the legality for USA hams. For
those having fun With ROS
Thanks for the feedback, some very good points. I think the higher end of
CW portions, is an especially good point.
Andy K3UK
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:50 PM, W8RIT w8...@qsl.net wrote:
Hi Andy,
First I'd like to say that I think I can argue both sides of the coin on
this matter.
I
Feel free to disagree, but please show respect for opinions that
differ from yours. BS is not the most respectful term when
disagreeing.
Andy K3UK
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 9:36 PM, W2XJ w...@w2xj.net wrote:
Bonnie you have a Ham unfriendly addenda. Say what you like but at the end of
the
Andy, I think you are incorrect. 50% of the 89 messages , so far, are
related to the legality in the USA issue. You are also preaching to the
choir, here. Most of the member agree that the regulations in the USA
should be as you suggest, and many representations have been made.
OK, now back
My station is listening for ROS signals on 14080 USB (dial). I am
interested in how ROS does across the Atlantic around 10-1300 UTC when
20M is usually marginal. Hopefully I will receive some European or
African signals.
Andy K3UK
Fredonia, NY
FN02
I missed their rumblings, but did not know anyone was using ROS near the
JT65A campsite, I will be tuned to 14080 until Man U and Everton match
starts.
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@tiscali.co.ukwrote:
Andy obrien wrote:
My station is listening for ROS
I will move to 17M and listen on 18105
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Dave Ackrill dave.g0...@tiscali.co.ukwrote:
Andy obrien wrote:
I missed their rumblings, but did not know anyone was using ROS near the
JT65A campsite, I will be tuned to 14080 until Man U and Everton match
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:54 AM, bruce mallon wa4...@yahoo.com wrote:
SO what you are saying is lets ctush the other modes so we can play with our
new toy ?
We just went through this with wideband/spredsprectrum on 6 and 2 meters .
I dont care what mode anyone uses as long as it does
Good point, I am so used to narrow modes that I forget such things.
Andy K3UK
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:06 AM, David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
wd4...@suddenlink.net wrote:
if you are gonna be trying new bands, at the minimum,
do use frequencies that are good for SSB or wideband digital.
Just some thoughts, critique welcome.
If we think about HF digital QSOs there are 5 general types.
1. Weak signal propagation probes that are frequent in nature and
regularly used by hams around the world (JT65A, ROS, WSPR, SLOW CW),
Usually the exchange is a signal report, callsign, and
201 - 300 of 593 matches
Mail list logo
