Amateur radio is not for contesting. Amateur radio is not a sport, it is for
communications...meaningful communications. Exchanging signal reports and
series numbers or such other drivel is not what amateur radio was intended for.
We need to start getting back to RADIO and COMMUNICATIONS,
Perhaps I can give you some insight at various levels of though as to why new
hams are NOT getting on the air.
What I'm about to say should not be mistaken for the words of someone with an
axe to grind or confused with someone who is simply being unpleasant.
I want to start with the fact that
dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 4:38 PM
Dan Hensley wrote:
I want to start with the fact that we remain in a very bad economy and people
...We're no longer amateur radio operators though. We're all just a bunch of
educated CB'ers. When you take the licensing we have in place, the lack of
equipment availability for working on one's equipment and teh fact that the
factories make it damn impossible even if you DO know what you're
Mr. Hinton,
You have hit the nail right on the head! I have a really busy life the last
many months and want to get study in for my Extra class ticket. I have my ARRL
VE Credentials but cannot give a test until I have that Extra ticket in hand.
Your comment about being proud of earning your
Echolink is just another computer messenger. Echolink is not ham radio, it has
no place in ham radio, and fails the test even as a tool of ham radio. Echolink
is for those who can't figure out how to make a real radio work!
--- On Tue, 11/24/09, expeditionradio expeditionra...@yahoo.com wrote:
I hate to sound stupid, but here goes:
What is all this RSID stuff? I've never heard of it until all these e-mails
have been going back and forth..
Thanks for any help
--- On Tue, 7/21/09, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote:
From: Tony d...@optonline.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] More RSID -
There are those of us who do not wish to be bombarded by Fred's muck
mire, especially in the body of an e-mail. Beyond that, you know as
do all of us that posting a copy of a thread from another forum is a
huge no-no due to copyright infringement.
--- On Wed, 10/1/08, Mark Thompson [EMAIL
The Grouply thing just seems as if it is something along the lines of just
another e-mail account for your group messages to go to. Why do that when one
can just choose to receive a digest at the original e-mail address?
Yahoo allows you to choose daily individual messages or a daily digest
That's the ARRL for ya. Individual hams aren't hams because they don't have
that corporate body effect. The way i see it, although I love amateur radio is
that alot of people want it to die so that they can make a buck with it like
some of the GMRS repeater owners do, and then the PS agencies /
Download Digipan or Ham Radio Deluxe. Then there is also MixW. Use it, tune to
the freq, do some fiddling and find out!
--- On Tue, 5/13/08, Ralph Mowery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ralph Mowery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [digitalradio] Signal on 3850
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date:
11 matches
Mail list logo