Re: [digitalradio] VHF Contesting

2010-07-10 Thread Dan Hensley
Amateur radio is not for contesting. Amateur radio is not a sport, it is for communications...meaningful communications. Exchanging signal reports and series numbers or such other drivel is not what amateur radio was intended for. We need to start getting back to RADIO and COMMUNICATIONS,

Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital

2009-12-15 Thread Dan Hensley
Perhaps I can give you some insight at various levels of though as to why new hams are NOT getting on the air. What I'm about to say should not be mistaken for the words of someone with an axe to grind or confused with someone who is simply being unpleasant. I want to start with the fact that

Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital

2009-12-15 Thread Dan Hensley
dave.g0...@tiscali.co.uk Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2009, 4:38 PM   Dan Hensley wrote: I want to start with the fact that we remain in a very bad economy and people

Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital

2009-12-15 Thread Dan Hensley
...We're no longer amateur radio operators though. We're all just a bunch of educated CB'ers. When you take the licensing we have in place, the lack of equipment availability for working on one's equipment and teh fact that the factories make it damn impossible even if you DO know what you're

Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital

2009-12-15 Thread Dan Hensley
Mr. Hinton, You have hit the nail right on the head! I have a really busy life the last many months and want to get study in for my Extra class ticket. I have my ARRL VE Credentials but cannot give a test until I have that Extra ticket in hand. Your comment about being proud of earning your

Re: [digitalradio] Echolink Re: Ham HF networking digital communication systems

2009-11-24 Thread Dan Hensley
Echolink is just another computer messenger. Echolink is not ham radio, it has no place in ham radio, and fails the test even as a tool of ham radio. Echolink is for those who can't figure out how to make a real radio work! --- On Tue, 11/24/09, expeditionradio expeditionra...@yahoo.com wrote:

Re: [digitalradio] More RSID - PLEASE!

2009-07-21 Thread Dan Hensley
I hate to sound stupid, but here goes: What is all this RSID stuff? I've never heard of it until all these e-mails have been going back and forth.. Thanks for any help --- On Tue, 7/21/09, Tony d...@optonline.net wrote: From: Tony d...@optonline.net Subject: Re: [digitalradio] More RSID -

Re: [digitalradio] CSS releases EmComm Ops Radio Software for Packet Radio

2008-10-01 Thread Dan Hensley
There are those of us who do not wish to be bombarded by Fred's muck mire, especially in the body of an e-mail. Beyond that, you know as do all of us that posting a copy of a thread from another forum is a huge no-no due to copyright infringement. --- On Wed, 10/1/08, Mark Thompson [EMAIL

Re: [digitalradio] Grouply's comment

2008-08-31 Thread Dan Hensley
The Grouply thing just seems as if it is something along the lines of just another e-mail account for your group messages to go to. Why do that when one can just choose to receive a digest at the original e-mail address? Yahoo allows you to choose daily individual messages or a daily digest

Re: [digitalradio] Re: New Hams and New Digital Technology

2008-07-06 Thread Dan Hensley
That's the ARRL for ya. Individual hams aren't hams because they don't have that corporate body effect. The way i see it, although I love amateur radio is that alot of people want it to die so that they can make a buck with it like some of the GMRS repeater owners do, and then the PS agencies /

Re: [digitalradio] Signal on 3850

2008-05-14 Thread Dan Hensley
Download Digipan or Ham Radio Deluxe. Then there is also MixW. Use it, tune to the freq, do some fiddling and find out! --- On Tue, 5/13/08, Ralph Mowery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Ralph Mowery [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [digitalradio] Signal on 3850 To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Date: