Hello All,
I live in Colorado Springs, Colorado. We are getting ready for a 4 county
mass causality exercise. This last Saturday we were doing some training,
antenna work, and testing at the EOC. One of the tests involved was
deploying our mobile command post about 30 miles out into the county.
Why were there so many stations with the name Marc from CA? If you call CQ
and someone works you, then you must QSY. Right? Sure were a lot of stations
running a frequency on 40 meters.
TNX 73,
Dave N0EOP
31033
Andy,
If you have one left I would be interested.
TNX 73,
Dave N0EOP
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 6:41 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Anyone need
Let's see existing tnc. Free software. Once setup and configured almost any
ham can use it. What is the catch? Other than it is slower than the Internet
or Winlink on HF.
TNX 73,
Dave N0EOP
73,
Dave N0EOP
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger J. Buffington
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 5:13 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Anyone using the Navigator by US Interface?
Dave
A friend just got his Navigator in the mail yesterday and is having
problems getting it to work. Anyone have any experience with the Navigator?
TNX 73,
Dave N0EOP
] On
Behalf Of Roger J. Buffington
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 11:48 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Anyone using the Navigator by US Interface?
Dave Sloan wrote:
A friend just got his Navigator in the mail yesterday and is having
problems getting it to work
Peter,
I just tried from Colorado and it failed.
Dave N0EOP
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of wa8vbx
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 10:04 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] qrz.com ...
Hello,
When using the data din plug in the back I have no problem with PSK. But,
RTTY is being a little more difficult to setup. On the radio does everyone
use Data USB for all bands? In your software program do you set it for AFSK
or FSK? USB or LSB? Do you use a Mark offset and if so how
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 11:50 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FT-920 Setup for RTTY ???
Usually, LSB is used for RTTY and USB for
Thanks for all of the assistance. I went back and reread the FT-920 manual
(novel idea)! When you use the data plug on the back of the FT-920 you set
the mode to data USB for both PSK and for RTTY. Then through the menu you
have to change the factory default for the shift for the AFSK. This
Jerry,
I don't know how you are getting away with having the sliders all of the
way at the top. That overdrives my FT920 (using a rascal interface).
Everything I have read says to keep the sliders somewhere towards the bottom
to prevent overdriving your transmitter.
73,
Dave N0EOP
Andy,
What is alg.exe? What percentage of ram is it using? Have you tried to
end task on alg.exe? If so, what happened?
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andrew O'Brien
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 6:34 PM
To:
Not sure what your problem would be. I have a FT920, Rascal Interface, SB
sound card, P 4 computer running XP. With a WinPSK program and it works
great for me. I have the FT920 in data usb mode and take the output from the
data din plug in the back.
Good luck,
Dave N0EOP
-Original
14 matches
Mail list logo
