] ROS v 4.8.X not spamming cluster
Jose uses Cluster Auto-Spots to advertise his software. The more spots,
the more it appears to be a popular mode to the uninformed Cluster
User.
To me, this attempted deception has been obvious ever since the issue of
any auto-spots came up.
Isn't
Same here , my first exposure was with the old mechanical clunkers. The paper
tape, chad, oil and the smells.. they had it all, hihi
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Rudy Benner
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 6:57 AM
Subject: Re:
And if you are an ARRL member, they will do it for you free.
73 Buddy WB4M
What does one have to do to re-new their ticket on-line
now? Been so lone I forgot
http://www.obriensweb.com/digispotter.html
Chat, Skeds, and Spots all in one (resize to suit)
Facebook=
Whats so dang fantastic about ROS anyway, that it deserves pages and pages
of emails about it? Remember that other new digital mode a few months ago,
and how great it was, or have you forgotten abouit it already?
73 Buddy WB4M
RTTY forever
- Original Message -
From: Steinar Aanesland
Yes,
14.075 was the Pactor calling freq, don't know who decided that. I have
not heard any ARQ Pactor in a long time, is it still used by anyone?
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 10,
John and others,
well I jumped in too soon. I thought he meant Pactor I as it was not
specified in the original message. I also used to love both Pactor and
Amtor ARQ modes.. still love Clover too, and will use any of them.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andy obrien k3uka...@... wrote:
A quick fix for this entire mess is to suggest to those running automated
traffic stations to use the World Wide Web. The web is faster, less
likely to be affected by atmospheric changes, and remove a thorn in the
Probably ROS will meet the same fate, even if US hams could use it. This
ROS mania is ridiculous, and I think it will go the same way as MFSK,
Domino, etc. PSK31 and RTTY will still rule the day.
73 Buddy WB4M
It has been a few years since Dominoex was added to our tool box. I
still see
I agree,
and wager 6 months from now hardly anyone will be using ROS. And for those who
say im gonna use it regardless of the FCC reply, well go ahead, start saving
for your fine.
73 Buddy WB4M
For the love of god, (just an expression)
Will everyone please stop
The default sound card is 0, not 1.
I can get the program to genrate tones but no way to select com ports to key
the xmitter.
73 Buddy WB4M
??? running win-xp-pro with out board usb sound as well as mother board
sound .. how do I select usb card .. can only see number box , sound seems
There is now only 4 options, for USA hams who still
want to use ROS on HF bands:
1. Operate ROS... knowing that you are breaking the
FCC Rules, and roll the dice, hoping you don't get caught.
2. Go on an uphill battle to change the FCC Rules, and
possibly win or lose after a year
G-Tor was only useable by the Kantronics line of TNCs years ago, like Clover
and HAL gear.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: sholtofish sho...@probikekit.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 5:12 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Has anyone tried this?
I totally agree Phil,
I get micro-mangaged enough at work.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: phil williams ka1...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Rethinking digital mode band plans-developing
W3VG
KH6TY wrote:
Already replied directly as requested.
73
Skip KH6TY
Andy obrien wrote:
I think Skip Teller is at least familiar with this. Skip ?
Andy K3UK
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:26 PM, F.R
Good points by G3OBU.
I find Macros to be quite useful. I use them to send info that is part of a
normal QSO. I use them for program operation, such as ALIGN:1500.. I imbed
Macros to log the QSO when it ends. I have macros loaded with QSO info in
several different languages. Why
Why not encourage them to simply UPGRADE their license?? Instead handing
out more freebies?
73 WB4M
Buddy
- Original Message -
From: Gary grwes...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 12:55 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
I
Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digitalI totally agree with W2XJ
73 de WB4M
Buddy
- Original Message -
From: W2XJ
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
I think it is a bad idea. With the
Hi all,
I'm another long-time MixW user and prefer it over the other programs.
But like Andy, K3UK, I'm afraid MixW is becoming another orphaned ham
program! How well I remember the old XPWin programs and Gary just threw in
the towel one day and got out of ham radio.
I've seen posts
No, I haven't. Haven't heard any RSID's for the past 2 days actually.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: obrienaj aobri...@stny.rr.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 5:56 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] RS ID use ?
Anyone notice an increase in
Same here,
I run MixW on my laptop with Vista and it works perfectly.
73 Buddy WB4M
^
I have ver. 2.19 of MixW running on my Vista machine.
Bob, W5XR
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
Hi all,
When I click the vocalization tab, I get an error message saying No
English_Voice.SER file
Where do I find that file?
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Jose A. Amador ama...@electrica.cujae.edu.cu
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009
Tony others,
YES! I also have seen a huge increase in the exotic modes. I had the
voice announce turned on and it scared the crap outta me the first time because
I had forgotten about it, hi. RSID makes recognizing and tuning in other
modes so easy!I think this will overcome any
My 2 cents worth:
I have tried them all and still prefer MixW. It is a simple program yet
does everything I want it to. It is neat and orderly in layout and
appearance. It will use my RAC CD, a lot of logging programs won't. I
just click on a callsign and the logging info fills right
On 20 meters, 14.075 lsb was the calling freq, years ago.
If you need a sked, email me.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: ka2qit ka2...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 9:18 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Pactor 1 Frequencies
Does anyone know
I'm monitoring 14.109 now, MT-63,
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] QRV MT63 / Contestia 1k 14109.5
All,
Had a short QSO with Russ, NC5O on both MT63 and
(2300 utc)
Claudio-LU2VCD
2009/3/18, Tony d...@optonline.net:
Buddy,
I'm in QSO with Jack, W0HPE on 14109.5 / MT63 1K. It's 22:40z. Come join
us...
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: F.R. Ashley gda...@clearwire.net
To: digitalradio
not hearing a thing!
Just the way it goes sometimes Buddy. I think you and I are a bit close
for
20 meters. Jack was Q5 copy, but he had to go QRT. I'll be hear for a
while
so maybe someone else will pop on.
Tony -K2MO
- Original Message -
From: F.R. Ashley gda...@clearwire.net
Hi,
If you wait until June (or July?) to buy a new PC with Vista installed, you
will get a free upgrade to Windows 7, which will replace Vista later this
year. If you buy now, the upgrade is not free. Just something else to
chew on b4 making your decision about a new computer.
73 Buddy
What activity? I have yet to hear a MFTTY signal on any band. I've called
CQ for hours but no response, mainly on 20 and 80 meters.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD wd4...@suddenlink.net
To: DIGITALRADIO digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent:
I've tried calling CQ endlessly on 20 and 80 meters but never once gotten a
response or even heard an MFTTY station. Where is everyone hiding?
I've read where some use 14.068 on 20 meters but it is so crowded there with
PSK and all. I've also tried 3.591 on 80 meters but no luck there either.
QRV 14.068 MFTTY USB / 3991 USB
WB4M 2357z 1/13/09
- Original Message -
From: Norbert Pieper polar_elect...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 10:35 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 80m
Hello Howard,
The issue is solved:
Cause
qrv on 14.075 USB now. (1825z ). mftty
wb4m
- Original Message -
From: Tapani Juhola tapani.juh...@kolumbus.fi
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] MFTTY on 80m
Hei, Tommi.
Nyt näin ensi kertaa selkeän CQ-kutsun
Listening 3.591 USB for MFTTY now.
WB4M Budyd
- Original Message -
From: Steinar Aanesland saa...@broadpark.no
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m
Hi Siegfried
We are now testing the latest version
I heard some MFTTY signals but they would not decode.. no RX print at all..
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: wd4kpd wd4...@suddenlink.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 3:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] MFTTY FREQ.
LOOKING FORWARD TO FIRST
John,
I first got on RTTY in 1981, and had a Robot 800 keyboard. tI would send
and recv ASCII.
It was fast, but it was more difficult to tune that Baudot, and it was quite
error-prone.
I always loved the Clover mode, but it did not catch on either.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message
Hi Tony,
I copied you about 80% here in central NC. I never did hear any of the other
stations you were working. I gave you a call but just did not have good prop.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Tony
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 25,
It is the same old 2.0 version,
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Thanks -- MT63 contacts
Is this the old program from Nino or something
HI John,
I was in the USAF from 1968-1972, and we used the old oilers with punched
tape, I think it was a model 15? Nothing like the smell and noise of the
old clunkers.
73 Buddy WB4M
Interesting statement.
Not to long ago I was at a meeting of a big group of hams.
The subject came up
John,
You should have been in a comm center with anywhere from 3 to 40 running at
the same time! Turn on the AC!!
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 11:10 AM
Subject: Re:
Howard,
I've read where the thinking is that most hams won't bother with the
PACTOR I if only because of little desire to buy an expensive outboard
TNC. What about the hams who never threw away their original TNC,
the one sitting in the closet per se?
I've often wondered the same thing.
Hi all,
seems like there are tons of ham keeping Art, KB2KB, very busy these days!
:)
Merry Christmas, Happy 2008,
Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 12:33 PM
Subject: Re:
I'd think AMTOR would be included under RTTY.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 7:21 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] What DXCC mode is AMTOR?
Got my DXCC the other day and was surprised to
Why any amateur would want to see our bands cluttered up with a
third-rate email forwarding system is a mystery
AMEN! This is what I've been saying/asking all along. Add to that,
non-hams using ham frequencies for email.
73 Buddy WB4M
Sounds to me like you understand perfectly.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Brian A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 12:01 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Let me understand
The digital systems being proposed for emergency use
The Pactor/Amtor calling frequency used to be 14.075, LSB. This was years
ago. 7.075 LSB for 40 meters.
Im on 20 right now.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:38 PM
Subject: [digitalradio]
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Overcrowded on 14109.5
And some still wonder *why* the MT63 guys packed up and moved...
Reminds me a lot of the
How about TDM ??
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Sawtelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 11:12 AM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: More digital modes than you can shake a stick at
Great list Andy
Here's a few that didn't make their
Seems like a while back, 14.109.50 was the suggested MT63 frequency.
As for what's so great about it, I always thought it was a fun mode..so
different from everything else.As for speed, all modes can outrun the crap
out of my typing speed, (and just about everyone else's too) so I really
] Re: CQ CH?
Rick ...
99% of us took the code and don't use it. BUT that
said nothing wrong with thoes who are GOOD at and
enjoy the mode I myself love lissing to the guys
zipping along at 12-20 wpm even if i can only copy a
few letters in a row It's a neet mode and VERY
good
- Original Message -
From: John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: 3580kHz-3600kHz Freq Coordination Info
After looking at the winlink position report page there must
be 50 or so hams at
I have always felt the CW issue was not really about CW. Guess that
sounds a bit odd. It seems to me most see it as a reduction of standards,
dumbing down so to speak. I think CW did act as a filter of some sort
because it did indeed keep some people from getting their license, whether
or
- Original Message -
From: Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 20, 2007 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] PSK31 Pile-up on 30M (Lakshadweep Islands)
Yeah. Same here. just nothing on any band from them..Been that way since I
put
Roger,
You are correct! I also heard the US hams in the contest on 17 meters.
Also there was an XT2 on there but I did hear the US hams exchanging reports
and contesting.
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Clover..
So now I know who was jamming me... just kidding :)
73 WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Leigh L. Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 5:40 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] What mode is this?
4 parallel signals, each looks
What is the purpose of this?
During a contest, contesters have always disregarded everyone else so what is
new?
Have fun,
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:46 PM
Subject:
Looks to me like you answered your own question!
73 WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 6:51 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Does an RST of 519 Make Sense ?
Does an RST of 519 Make Sense ?
I had a
Clover was here long before PSK. The suggested frequency of 14065.50 was
started back in 1991 or 1992. PSK came along years later and the 14070 was
chosen for its area of operation, between the Clover freq. and the Pactor
calling freq. of 14075.It had nothing to do with bandwidth.
Date:Jun 21, 2006 3:40 PM
This is not correct.
bandplans.com entries are all based on user's input. While Bonnie has
inputted a lot of those, everyone else is welcome to submit, too. Site
itself is not taking sides either way. The purpose is to provide a
Dave,
You are correct. And I'm afraid we haven't seen anything yet!
73 Buddy
WB4M
So in summary, Winlink PMBOs own all frequencies between 14100.5 and
14112 kHz. If you operate in this range and are QRM'd by a Winlink
PMBO, its your own fault for being uncooperative.
Perhaps now that
Andy,
I agree with Ed. I am always interested in
what the other ham is using, especially for digital modes. Hard to
find a Commodore 64 user any more though...
73 Buddy
WB4M
- Original Message -
From:
Ed Davis
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday,
I opted for the T10 and have been well pleased with it, it beats the
heck out of the triband 3 element beam I had before. I worked K7C and
3Y0X on 20 barefoot with a Kenwood TS 430S and the T10 is FLAT on all
bands all the way across, CW or phone portions. The 3Y0X op, 2 calls, I
worked
Have you tried CW Type? Is recv companion program is CW Get.
73 WB4M
Buddy
- Original Message -
From: Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 11:48 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] CW program???
What does everyone recommend to copy and
Its because the ARRL has gone nuts, like Bush.
73 de WB4M
Buddy
- Original Message -
From: David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 2:15 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.do as we say, not what we do
.
It may be technically feasible to do everything WinLink, the ARRL and
others may want to do by allowing more spectrum to be allocated to
these services, but by doing so is the resulting environment still
Amateur Radio?
This question, to me, is what it all boils down to.
I think the
- Original Message -
From:
Dr. Howard S. White
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 5:28
PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL proposal
removes baud rate limitations on HF
Which is why they developed Time Division
My 3,
RTTY
MFSK
Clover
73 Buddy WB4M
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups
Rich
It sounds very much like a MT-63 signal, but its not, hi.. I have no clue
as to what it is,
73 Buddy WB4M
Right now, in Rochester, NY, I'm seeing a wideband signal extending
from 7071.5 to 7073.1, with very steep skirts on the edges. From an
audio perspective, it sounds like a
I just wish someone would explain to me why ham radio needs to be turned
into a free email system, especially for non-hams to use. I fear this is
just the foot in the door..
Buddy,
WB4M
- Original Message -
From: Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
F.R. Ashley wrote:
John,
Is the reason for wanting to operate AMTOR just for the novelty of an
old mode? I could understand using it if it was possible to do it as a
sound card mode at a level comparable to hardware modems.
Is the reason for operating Olivia, Contesta, Domino, MT-63
Buddy,
Why is the Amateur service more a free e-mail system to over-the-air
licensed operators any more than it is a free phone system for those
who use phone? I don't see anything in the 3rd party agreements about
mode of operation.
Steve, k4cjx
You didnt answer my question.
73
Amen to that Dave!
WB4M
Yes, RM-11306 will definitely provide more space for semi-automatic
operation -- to the detriment of everyone else.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector :
Ten years ago, before Al Gore invented the internet I had 500 plus
messages (email if you will) pass my packet BBS everyday.
I don't recall all this type of talk back then.
Thats just it, it was not email! Besides, I do remember PLENTY of talk
about the HF packet stations.The ARRL, in
I can work Amtor or any other linked
mode. But being a working stiff, I will be available after 5pm
Eastern time. We can set up a sked if you wish. The 30
meter band would be great.
73 Buddy
WB4M
- Original Message -
From:
John
Bradley
To:
- Original Message -
From: John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 7:13 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] amtor anyone
Sitting on 7,075 (dial reading 7,077.12)
Selcal WJAB
I will put ouit some CQs on FEC Amtor around 9pm eastern time,
: that some operators of automatic
stations consider their networks and traffic to be more important
than low-speed, real-time keyboard-to-keyboard or voice-to-voice
QSOs, and thus will fire up on an already-occupied frequency rather
than take the time to QSY.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
On 20 meters automated data stations are given from 14.089 to 14.099
and 14.101 to 14.112 MHz depending on the signals actual spectrum used
by the signal.
Yup, just what we need. Good job UK, ruin the RTTY freqs. Where will it
all end?
WB4M
Hi all,
I have the program up and running and need to know
where to look for signals, or make a sked. A lot of digital on
80 meters at night, good thing! Glad to see 80 used more.
73
Buddy, WB4M
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to telnet://208.15.25.196/
Other areas of interest:
Hi all,
Another question about Domino EX, is everyone
going to use the default of 11baud, single space?
I'm on 80 meters right now calling CQ in 11baud on
3.590. 1007 EDT
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin der Kinderen
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
HI,
Man, that really brings back the memories! I could almost smell the oil and
see the chad being collected in the bin. (unless it was running chadless,
hi)
73 Buddy WB4M
- Original Message -
From: John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday,
- Original Message -
From:
Andrew J.
O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2005 1:56
PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Poll on digital
modes, results so far
FYI
PSK31 ahead with RTYY second, MFSK and Olivia
both coming
Heard it yesterday too..
73 WB4M
Buddy
- Original Message -
From: Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 12:15 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Can any one copy the SSB voice around 14.071?
There is someone with a open mike or VOX is turning
Multipsk
6 YRS A G ON WA A SE LF E MPL OYE D RAD I O ES T V RE PAI R
MAN=NW JUSTA BEA C H BUMHEE HEE= OKON WX ES OVE R HR T O O MU CH OF T HE WIT
ET STUFF SO SU RE WISH WE CUD S EE SE N D SUM OUTTOUH EI= B EEN VT E T AE ITEL
YES HAD TO CUT
So, which of the three
Andy,
Which program do you use? I am new at
Olivia and use MultiPSK. I finally was able to decode a station
earlier, on "Standard" mode and USB.
I am unable to tell which mode you are copying in
that pic.. actually it does not look like any Olivia sigs I have
seen.
73 Buddy
WB4M
On 9/6/2005 8:10:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Buddy, I am not suggesting that we give up on Clover but I
would bet that most of the Olivia users are not using CLO, the only
reason to suggest using CLO as the electronic acceptable ADIF mode when
QSLing a Olivia QSO is to use an
Ron,
I'll give the new version of MultiPSK a try, its
been quite a while since I used it. I just hope the MicroKeyer
software has a template for it, hi..
73 Buddy
WB4M
The K3UK DIGITAL MODES SPOTTING CLUSTER AT telnet://208.15.25.196/
More info at http:///www.obriensweb.com
I believe the main thing is to keep an eye on your ALC and keep it
minimized. I did read a post on here by someone who worked a DX station and
boasted he ran 1,500 watts out on PSK, but if he or she was not overdriving,
they probably had a clean signal.
You are fully capable of splattering
86 matches
Mail list logo
