Just picked this up from HamSpots:
Due to increased abuse of the Cluster Network by spam auto-spots generated
by the ROS software.
HamSpots will no longer provide a Local Spot Chat facility for the
promotion of the ROS mode.
HamSpots will no longer report a consolidated view of ROS Cluster
Hi Skip!
Well said. Now let's see how many people in the group really pay attention
to what they read.
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 1:28 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio]
)
One other comment: Tactical ham frequencies??!!! What in the world??? For
ham SWAT teams? LOL Didn't Indianapolis PD get into trouble for less than
that? :-)
73 de Stu AF6IT
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Greg n9nwo@ wrote:
If the first generation of digital was PACKET-IRLQ
If the first generation of digital was PACKET-IRLQ-Echolink-APRS (generation
Zero was CW and RTTY), then the second generation was D-Star. D-Star brought
everything together along with digital voice. While D-Star is great, its
technology is already dated.
So what will the third generation of
Have you taken time to actually read the pro RM-11392 comments? Most
all of them are individual thoughts. It is the winlink camp that is
posting the boiler plate comments hoping that numbers not content will
kill the petition.
Greg
KC7GNM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Peter G. Viscarola
would be better suited to increase
the number of available operating modes to encourage further
hams use of HF spectrum.
See #3 above about giving each mode it's own slice of the amateur radio
spectrum.
Greg
KC7GNM
it?
At 08:54 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote:
Have you taken time to actually read the pro RM-11392 comments? Most
all of them are individual thoughts. It is the winlink camp that is
posting the boiler plate comments hoping that numbers not content will
kill the petition.
Greg
KC7GNM
I can tell you why. Because P3 is 2.4khz wide and every other mode you
mentioned is much smaller so it takes up less spectrum and the fact
that it is being used for email that is technically against part 97
because there is an alternative called sailmail out there.
Greg
KC7GNM
as if they just don't care anymore. That is why I am on my
crusade to eliminate the inteference from these pactor robots.
Greg
KC7GNM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would you say this is true with any Automatic Station ?
RTTY - Amtor as well
Rick I can tell you now they will not be able to tell you. All Bonnie
can do is say it is needed 24/7 but cannot give a good scenario that
will fit. All she keeps doing is saying emcomm 24/7 and nothing else.
If you do get more from the winlinkers I would be very suprised.
Greg
KC7GNM
Why would you want to transmit on 2 different sidebands at once with
psk31? All you are doing is hogging up part of the spectrum.
Greg
KC7GNM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. It will work fine!
You will transmit PSK31 on 2 frequencies
The original pactor is fine since it is only 200hz wide. Even P2 is
fine but when a station transmits on PIII now we are wasting 2.4khz of
bandwidth using a mode that is only 30% faster than P2 but 500% wider.
That is why it has a bad rap.
Greg
KC7GNM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John
Probably not since DSB is AM. What type of DSB radio are you
attempting to use on PSK?
Greg
KC7GNM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Anil Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone advise whether I can use a DSB transmitter for transmiting
PSK31?
73s de
SM0D
You know I almost believe each and every one of these. Almost sound
exactly what the winlink crowd is saying.
Greg
KC7GNM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Dave Bernstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. You're using panoramic reception and consider signals anywhere on
your waterfall to be QRM
of hams? Until winlink and other spectrum
inefficient modes can cooperate and share the hf spectrum then I don't
think they need more space to operate in. They already are a menace in
the auto sub bands as it is.
Greg
KC7GNM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED
number.
Don't know where you learned math at but where I learned it that is a
very small minority, not huge at all.
Greg
KC7GNM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, expeditionradio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg KC7GNM wrote:
The point is Bonnie I have seen digital radio going down the tubes
Bonnie you keep forgetting one important factor in your automatic
scenario. There has to be a human on either end to 1) send the message
and 2) to read the message. What is the winlink station going to do?
Automatically send food and water?
Greg
KC7GNM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
that question back to you. Do we have a
right to get on the air using other modes besides winlink?
Greg
KC7GNM
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Take a look at this map
http://winlink.org/positions/PosReports.aspx
I don't ZL3LL about 2000
Hi Jose!!!
You hit the nail right on the head. people also need to remember that, when the
power, land line and cell phone towers along with the internet fail due to a
catastrophe Ham Radio will always be there and be able to get through.
73, Greg, W8GCD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No trees were killed
sometime.
73, Greg DeChant, W8GCD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No trees were killed in the transmission of this message but,
several million electrons were inconvienced.
- Original Message -
From: pcooke2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 1:33 PM
20 matches
Mail list logo
