MIXW w/Kenwood TS 440SAT. In service for at
least 5 years. No interface. Direct from 440 to XP computer.
73
At 07:07 AM 1/13/2010, you wrote:
.
.
Hello Happy Hams
After returning to Amateur Radio after a very
long absence, I am 'messing about' with digital
modes - all of which are
Forgot to add: 83 yrs, 3/4 brain cell.
At 07:17 AM 1/13/2010, you wrote:
MIXW w/Kenwood TS 440SAT. In service for at
least 5 years. No interface. Direct from 440 to XP computer.
73
At 07:07 AM 1/13/2010, you wrote:
.
.
Hello Happy Hams
After returning to Amateur Radio after a
And I am told by some of the people who ran/run a beta copy of the
new Microsoft coming out that it is/will be compatible with the XP
programs and really works well. Time will tell but is something to
possibly look forward to.
At 11:46 AM 10/10/2009, you wrote:
Interesting and great
Flex Radio
At 08:58 AM 10/9/2009, you wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:28:22PM -, ve3hsc wrote:
Who makes the BEST radio for 30 meters.
That's a how long is a piece of string? question, OM.
Best with respect to what qualities? Sensitivity, audio quality,
filtering, DSP, tolerance of
Oh? NMCM is using Pactor 1 and my ancient KAM
is working well on the circuit. The latest and
greatest is NOT always necessary. Nice, Yes, but
not necessary. And yes, I can also receive Pactor 1 with MIXW2.
Les/NNN0KTM WA
At 04:24 PM 9/15/2008, you wrote:
Already own MixW.
Need to be
Go to Africa and learn the drums. They work too and are effective
over a large area.
At 03:28 PM 6/1/2008, you wrote:
Could be true Chuck. I guess to take it just a step further, we need
to ask Simon to start looking into writing another mode into his
great software to decode/operate the
That is what I did when the opportunity came up to get a new laptop
but loaded with VISTA. Wiped it totally and loaded XP w/2. Works
great. Have found nothing so far that it would not do.
Les
At 03:28 PM 3/24/2008, you wrote:
I'm looking at purchasing a new laptop, and I can't find
That smell and those sounds will never be forgotten. Too bad the
brats have no chance to experience them, 15, 19, etcLoops - reminiscing
73 Les
At 07:30 AM 2/12/2008, you wrote:
--- In
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
Robert Chudek - K0RC [EMAIL
Hey Patrick!! Cud u give me the URL: to download this pgm? Appreciate!!
73 Les
At 02:05 PM 1/31/2008, you wrote:
Frank,
I will see if I can find this on a Vista computer.
One other solution would be to see what happens with a test program
(with a lot of flags).
If you are interested,
Thanks Much!!!
At 04:45 PM 1/31/2008, you wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 6:59 PM, Les Warriner
mailto:leswa7ham%40earthlink.net[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Patrick!! Cud u give me the URL: to download this pgm? Appreciate!!
Les, the main mirror site is Earl's, N8KBR:
http://multipsk.eqth.info
You have led a sheltered life. Try operating in the Philipines after
a volcano blows, or in Mexico after the same incident, or in Africa
after a transvaal fire, then tell me Hams are not needed. It's too
bad we are getting comments like this from the uninformed with no
experience. Get some
Now, 20 million + 1
73
At 08:05 PM 1/11/2008, you wrote:
If the statement below is False, why are there
not more call signs showing up on the main ALE frequencies?
I can leave my rig on 14109.5 or 10145.5 for 24
hours and only see, at most 4 or 5 stations? Ditto for the ALE website
IMNSHO malicious interference, interference that prevents or
interrupts a QSO on a frequency from any source is ILLEGAL by the
existing rules. The fact that this rule is not being enforced should
generate information to the FCC on these interferences and requests
to the same agency to clean
We are supposedly adults and having passed the
test, know the rules. BUT: There are always
those who: I am a member of NavyMarineCorpMARS
and we have people who come out of the ham bands,
well out and cannot be a mistake, and interfere
with NMCM traffic and make what they think are
wise
What planet do you live on? The CB'ers started a plan called REACT
which proved to be an excellent program, is very much in use today,
and to read their plan and the ARRL EMCOM course, it is difficult to
tell the difference. Best that you should line your ducks up before
starting to shoot.
Naw, they'd never do that. Maybe it is because they believe in the
rule of being of assistance to their fellow man. After more than 50
years of emergency service, military, civilian, Amateur, etc., until
you have walked in our footsteps, watch your insults.
At 08:16 AM 10/18/2007, you
And is strictly illegal by Part 97. 5 KW linears are
available. Want the address? No wonder why Hollingsworth spends so
much time in California.
At 08:32 AM 10/14/2007, you wrote:
Rick wrote:
Demetre,
What you are recommending is completely unacceptable to 99.9% of all
hams.
Many
Your statement was that you would increase power to interfere with
him/her deliberately.
At 09:36 AM 10/14/2007, you wrote:
Les Warriner wrote:
And is strictly illegal by Part 97. 5 KW linears are available.
Want the address? No wonder why Hollingsworth spends so much time in
California
Certainly an education and informative exchange? How about some
informatgion instead? Moderator?
At 02:41 PM 10/3/2007, you wrote:
AA6YQ comments below
--- In
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
John Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
By your own
Lots of words, no intelligence for those of us struggling with the programs.
At 04:14 PM 10/3/2007, you wrote:
On 10/3/07, Les Warriner
mailto:leswa7ham%40earthlink.net[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Certainly an education and informative exchange? How about some
informatgion instead
That is a USAF MARS frequency.
At 04:22 PM 5/15/2007, you wrote:
Anyone else hearing the digital-sounding signal on 13985.5 USB?. S5 here...
--
Andy K3UK
Skype Me : callto://andyobrien73callto://andyobrien73
www.obriensweb.com
Look at the new Linux OS:
http://www.consumerfaffairs.com/news04/2007/ubuntu_review.html
There may be light at the end of the tunnel after all
At 05:14 PM 5/6/2007, you wrote:
Is this app operating system neutral or is
it dependent on a single OS?
Thanks! 73, doc, KD4E
Hi Doc,
141
You are correct and you do not have to deal with people in India to
get help. There is a book out, The world is flat, that very well
explains what is going on in the hi-tech companies.
At 10:51 AM 4/28/2007, you wrote:
Hi Dave:
I have no lost love for Gateway. but even worst yet is Dell..
How can you say so much with your tongue firmly implanted in your
cheek? I hope anyway...
At 09:44 AM 3/31/2007, you wrote:
FCC Announcement
It was announced today that Kellogg's and the Federal Communications
Commission have signed a pact to issue Amateur Radio Licenses on
specially
Horse Feathers. From 50 years of experience - military and civilian
At 07:01 AM 3/21/2007, you wrote:
I really dont want to start a CW vs anything
war here really I DONT.. but you are dead
wrong on CW it is faster to talk with CW than
with voice and you can QSK that is what is was
And if you are describing an incident where a
tornado has touched down you can certainly make
sure that the people in the emergency operations
center know exactly what you are talking - sorry
keying - about and the location abbreviated. We
learned the hard way in Korea and Viet Nam spell
it
What did Ham Radio do before the Internet E-Mail?
At 03:51 PM 3/15/2007, you wrote:
Hi Jaun,
Can sked with you on 20 meters: it's 22:50z. Try
14109.5?
Tony KT2Q
- Original Message -
From: Juan Carlos mailto:jc%40parra.cc[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Whoops. Yes, they do correct time for DST and standard time. My
clocks, atomic clock controlled, changed at 1 AM EDT by gaining an
hour. My UTC clock did not change - thankfully!!!
At 04:45 PM 3/11/2007, you wrote:
Hello There,
WWV has always gone by UTC.
UTC has no Daylight Savings Time
PM 3/11/2007, you wrote:
Wait! WWV and WWVB transmit UTC time codes. There is absolutely no
way for either station to 'know' in which time zone your atomic clock
is located. So How could they correct time for DST???
Enlighten me please
73, Chuck/AA5J
At 09:00 PM 3/11/2007, Les Warriner
The United States was the LAST country of the world requiring it for
testing. Now there is NO country requiring it. Does that not say
something? It's fun, it's great, it has some definite uses but so
does RTTY. Should that be required too? I teach it to my kids in
school. They drive
And my Pegasus with the W(N?)4PY software will work right along side
them!! ($850.00) many years ago.
73
Les
At 01:43 PM 2/12/2007, you wrote:
Thanks for the comments.
The Jupiter now cost $1495 without an antenna tuner.
The SDR-1000 now cost $1499 without an antenna tuner.
The IC-746PRO
You are not alone in your thoughts. Our Technician class is 9 weeks,
2 hours every Monday afternoon, then testing. When the individuals
obtain their licenses they are fully qualified and knowledgeable Hams
as well as fully qualified Emergency Communications citizens. We
start with 6, 7 and
Ah Common. Just because we're old - - - -At 04:39 PM 1/21/2007, you wrote:
Hello folks,
Speaking of tests the next time you visit the doctor remember he has
a practice. So pick an old fart that has practiced on somebody else first!!
Everybody has to start somewhere.
Later
Brad N1NPK
33 matches
Mail list logo
