Well, I heard about CMSK a few days ago and downloaded the program. Initially
I had ZERO luck with decoding anything with it BUT part of that was NOT a lot
of CMSK signals on the air hi hi
I got on CMSK on the 11th of August and called CQ numerous times on 30mtrs
(10.141) and SOMEONE did
Olivia, Domino, and even MFSK16 can both fail to get good copy for the exact
same reason. So CMSK is not alone for sure.
However, it's surprises me that MultiPSK seldom fails to decode an olivia
signal while FLDigi (my fav program) does it much more often. I suspect there
is something that
, garylinnrobinson grobin1949@ wrote:
After almost giving up - I started again playing with the SampleRate
settings
and FINALLY started getting a docode!! By using Phil's signal I finally got
perfect copy with a samplerate of 8062.
Hmmm - if it's that sensitive to sample rate settings
I added a Forum web page on my http://www.oliviamode.com site. A link to it is
on the oliviamode.com home page or the forum can be accessed by using the same
url with /forum on the end : http://www.oliviamode.com/forum
It can be used to post sitings of Olivia activity, set up schedules, let
I have been hearing a signal on or about 14.076 for the last several
days and don't know if it is related to the sigs you guys are hearing
on 14.171 or not. It is 500hz wide and sounded like Olivia mode BUT I
think I have identified the mode as PAX with MultiPSK.
I have partially identified the
Generally a good idea/plan. Though when the sun spot cycle really
begins to heat up the PSKers will fill up their area and move up and
generally anything other than a PSK signal most of them dismiss as
noise and blindly QRM right on top of it. Also when any major or semi
major contest is on the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Lindecker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello all,
Ed Sack (W3NRG) issued a paper which name is RANKING THE DIGITAL
MODES FOR THE STEALH QTH with Tables.doc at the ARRL and TAPR
Digital Communications Conference 2007.
Speaking of it, Ed aggreed to
If most PSK operators are interested in rag chewing -they need to move
on to a better digital mode. PSK and RTTY are the two worst modes
available. And that's the problem. Too many people, groups, and
leaders in the Ham Community promoting OLD and less than effective
modes of communication.
I
Those who do both CQinf and Listening and do it somewhat balanced?
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That made me smile ! Hams are split into two types,
(1) those who never call CQ
(2) Those who call CQ, but rarely.
Is there another of the species I wonder ?
Those who do both and do it somewhat balanced?
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That made me smile ! Hams are split into two types,
(1) those who never call CQ
(2) Those who call CQ, but rarely.
Is there another of the species I wonder ? Sounds like how
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not realize that there were very many hams who would never send a
CQ. They definitely fall into the very odd category. I recall an
article
in one of the ham magazines a few years (probably was actually decades
ago),
I was reading through these earlier postings and came across this one
and was a little bit baffled. How did you measure the throughput of
Olivia 250/2? From my testing it appears to be approx. 38wpm not 10.
Though that is clearly not as fast as RTTY. Olivia has never been
about being super
12 matches
Mail list logo
