[digitalradio] 160M PSK activity?

2008-01-06 Thread Gary - N3JPU
Been trolling the low end of 160M for a while, is there any PSK users on 160M? Gary Mitchelson N3JPU Montgomery Co. MD FM19 http://www.mitchelson.org/

Re: [digitalradio] 160M PSK activity?

2008-01-06 Thread Andrew O'Brien
There was some last night on 1807-1810 On Jan 6, 2008 6:26 PM, Gary - N3JPU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Been trolling the low end of 160M for a while, is there any PSK users on 160M? Gary Mitchelson N3JPU Montgomery Co. MD FM19 http://www.mitchelson.org/ -- Andy K3UK

[digitalradio] 160m

2008-01-03 Thread David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
hello all will be qrv tonight around 1810kc for any digi mode qso's. starting somewhat near sunset here in NC. grid FM15mm. barefoot with hygain 18ht over near perfect silicon dioxide. david/wd4kpd

Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place

2007-02-15 Thread Danny Douglas
PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 6:03 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place Danny, If we don't stay with the bandplans, then we can be sited by the FCC for not following good amateur practice. The ARRL Bandplan is the defacto

[digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD
guessing the freq is around 1807, but when ? david/wd4kpd

Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread KV9U
I wonder if group members might want to use 1808 KHz as the frequency for 160 meter digital modes. And that means the actual frequency. With the ease of seeing the bandwidth on waterfall displays, I favor centering on the frequency. This means that you need to put your dial frequency at the

Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread John Becker
At 08:28 AM 2/14/2007, you wrote: guessing the freq is around 1807, but when ? david/wd4kpd Keep in mind that the PropNet folks are using 1807.5...

[digitalradio] 160m meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread wd4kpd
would like to do some more on 160mseems you guys are down there, but need to when and where. david/wd4kpd

Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread Danny Douglas
- Original Message - From: KV9U [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 9:46 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place I wonder if group members might want to use 1808 KHz as the frequency for 160 meter digital modes

[digitalradio] 160m meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread wd4kpd
where and when is this meeting place on 160m...would like to join in. david/wd4kpd

Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread KV9U
Danny, If we don't stay with the bandplans, then we can be sited by the FCC for not following good amateur practice. The ARRL Bandplan is the defacto bandplan for the U.S. That is why I don't venture out of the digital part of 160 meters when using digital text modes. Ideally, CW stations

Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread KV9U
John, Most of us simply can not possibly know or even care about any particular use of any particular frequency as long as we are properly operating within our subband and mode. The one exception might be the area of automatic operation around the 14.100 beacons and maybe others in the world

Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread John Becker
Rick I don't care either. I don't use PSK myself. the only reason I bring it up it that the PropNet station broadcast a beacon so many times an hour. I just don't want to see a load of whining and crying when someone gets QRM by one oh the propnet station like they did over the pactor station.

Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread KV9U
John, Is it your understanding that they are running unattended beacons on 160 meters? Under Part 97 rules here in the U.S., it does not seem that you would be allowed to transmit an unattended beacon on that band. And if you did transmit a beacon, the bandplan calls for 1.999 at the very top

Re: [digitalradio] 160M digital meeting place

2007-02-14 Thread John Becker
Key word being *unattended* .. I can not speak for the stations on 160 but I do see the reports on the web site. First understanding how this animal works will really help you. I wont go into it here. At 06:27 PM 2/14/2007, you wrote: John, Is it your understanding that they are running

[digitalradio] 160M 1807.5

2007-02-12 Thread John Bradley
at 0315 Z K9NP, VE5MU, and K3GAU on 500/16 olivia ve5mu , John

Re: [digitalradio] 160M 1807.5

2007-02-12 Thread KV9U
I watched the print tonight on 160 and it was not all that good even though signals were 20 over 9 at times from some of the stations. One of the stations mentioned that the copy was rough at times. What do you think would have worked better? Right now QRN has been building this evening with

Re: [digitalradio] 160M 1807.5

2007-02-12 Thread John Bradley
, who, like you, was closer to the storms in the south. would like to try this with dominoEX or PAX2 John VE5MU - Original Message - From: KV9U To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:23 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] 160M 1807.5

Re: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.....do as we say, not what we do

2006-02-28 Thread Chuck Mayfield
He who tries to inflict political statements on amateur radio is a DAMN FOOL. 73, Chuck, AA5J At 02:26 PM 2/26/2006, you wrote: Its because the ARRL has gone nuts, like Bush. 73 de WB4M Buddy Regards, ChuckM mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/~clmayfield

Re: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.....do as we say, not what we do

2006-02-26 Thread F.R. Ashley
Its because the ARRL has gone nuts, like Bush. 73 de WB4M Buddy - Original Message - From: David Michael Gaytko // WD4KPD [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 2:15 PM Subject: [digitalradio] 160M DIGI OPS.do as we say, not what we do