Re: [digitalradio] JT65A - gotaway

2008-01-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mind you, I do have to pay attention to the difference between the column marked DT and the one marked dB when sending a report - Ooops! I'm having a problem coverting to the HF reporting system from the MS one. Well, that is my excuse. Dave (G0DJA)

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A - gotaway

2008-01-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew O'Brien wrote: Dave , there is a well known WSJT phenomenon whereby one receives FALSE CQs. When I first started using WSJT on HF and left on overnight , I received a few CQs from Japan on 40M but I was on a frequency that is not used in Japan. That's why I *never* have deep search

Re: [digitalradio] JT65A - gotaway

2008-01-04 Thread Andrew O'Brien
Dave , there is a well known WSJT phenomenon whereby one receives FALSE CQs. When I first started using WSJT on HF and left on overnight , I received a few CQs from Japan on 40M but I was on a frequency that is not used in Japan. As I mentioned in my Bozo'z Guide To HF JT65A, this occurs

[digitalradio] JT65A - gotaway

2008-01-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If only I didn't have to sleep! Found a load of the following CQ calls on 80M, from leaving WSJT running overnight... 034600 3 -16 1.6 100 3 * CQ KD5JGA EM161 0 034700 0 -15 3.3 -471 3 034800