Re: [digitalradio] Licensing of Pactor modes - Source code and detailed specifications

2007-12-31 Thread Simon Brown
- Original Message - From: f6cte [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, you can directly use the code without understand it but it is not the way I do because it is without interest. One main reason why PSK became so popular was that source code was made available early on. Many have implemented

Re: [digitalradio] Licensing of Pactor modes - Source code and detailed specifications

2007-12-31 Thread Rein Couperus
There is so much work involved in writing a fool-proof program with a good user interface that having to also write the encoding / decoding interface would make sure projects unfeasible for a single programmer who codes in his spare time. Simon HB9DRV I can second that :) Rein

[digitalradio] Licensing of Pactor modes - Source code and detailed specifications

2007-12-30 Thread f6cte
Hello Demetre and all, writers who although they allow everyone to use their program, they keep their code to themselves. Of course it is everyone's right to protect their code and I do not blame anyone here, I am just stating a fact. As I belong to this category (Multipsk author), here is

[digitalradio] Licensing of Pactor modes

2007-12-29 Thread Rick
Do you really know if Pactor was licensed to others? If SCS actually fully licensed the mode, it would seem to me that they would insure that the memory ARQ would have been included. Only the SCS modems seemed to have this feature. That is why they worked better between SCS modems than between

Re: [digitalradio] Licensing of Pactor modes

2007-12-29 Thread Howard Brown
transmission was received without noise. Of course this is Pactor 1 only. Howard K5HB - Original Message From: Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 10:04:45 AM Subject: [digitalradio] Licensing of Pactor modes